
Trump Presses Netanyahu to Withdraw Israeli Forces from Syria and Lebanon
The US president’s request, conveyed in a phone call, faces resistance from Israel over security zones as American-mediated talks resume in Rome.
President Donald Trump urged Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu last week to begin withdrawing Israeli forces from southern Syria and Lebanon, warning that the continued military presence was fuelling instability. According to US and Israeli officials cited by Axios, Trump told Netanyahu that Syria “doesn’t want you there” and that troops should redeploy to the border. The call took place a day after Trump met Syrian transitional President Ahmed al-Sharaa on the sidelines of a NATO summit in Turkey, and the same message was conveyed regarding Israel’s deployment in southern Lebanon.
Viewed from Washington, the request forms part of a months-long effort by the Trump administration to broker a new security arrangement between Israel and Syria. US officials quoted in the report said Washington had sought a gradual withdrawal of the Israel Defense Forces from Syrian territory occupied after the collapse of the Assad regime in December 2024. The Israeli Prime Minister’s Office, however, stated that Netanyahu “raised the need for security zones along Israel’s borders,” resisting the demand. Israeli officials maintain that the deployments are necessary to prevent a repeat of the 7 October 2023 attack, and some senior figures favour long-term control over parts of southern Syria and southern Lebanon, with calls for settlement activity in those areas.
In Lebanon, American mediators met Israeli and Lebanese delegations in Rome on Tuesday to discuss implementation of a framework agreement under which Israel committed to withdraw from two pilot zones in the south and allow the Lebanese army to deploy. Lebanese diplomatic sources say the armed forces are ready to assume responsibilities gradually, but demand a clear timetable for further Israeli withdrawals. Israeli officials, for their part, condition any redeployment on verification that the zones are free of Hezbollah weapons and military infrastructure, while Lebanese officials argue that the US military should conduct that assessment. The talks were described by one US official as positive, with both sides seeking to advance the process.
The diplomatic push comes amid rising friction in southern Syria, where residents have protested the Israeli presence and clashed with troops. The issue also carries domestic political weight for Netanyahu, with Israeli elections due in roughly three months. The broader regional context includes a newly reimposed US blockade on Iranian ports following attacks on vessels in the Strait of Hormuz. As of now, no Israeli withdrawal has begun from either Syria or the two Lebanese pilot zones, and the dossier remains the subject of active but unresolved American-led mediation.
| Arab Levant-Maghreb press | −0.60 | critical |
|---|---|---|
| Iranian & allied press | −0.80 | critical |
| Southeast Asian press | −0.10 | neutral |
Trump's pressure on Netanyahu for withdrawal is a necessary step to end Israeli occupation in Syria and Lebanon. Israel must negotiate seriously.
The bloc uses the authority of Israeli media reports to lend credibility to its narrative of Israeli occupation and the need for withdrawal, while highlighting Israeli internal skepticism to suggest weakness.
The Arab bloc omits Netanyahu's stated need for security zones and the Israeli security perspective, which would complicate the narrative of simple occupation.
The Zionist regime must withdraw immediately; Trump's demand is an opportunity to stop the aggression.
The bloc employs emotionally charged language ('Zionist regime') and frames Trump's demand as a direct order, amplifying the pressure on Israel while downplaying Netanyahu's counter-arguments.
The Iranian bloc omits any mention of the new Syrian government's capabilities or the broader regional context, focusing solely on Israeli aggression. Also omitted is the fact that Trump's demand might be part of a larger US strategy.
Trump's request is reasonable, but Israel needs security guarantees. The situation is complex.
The bloc maintains a neutral tone by citing multiple sources (Axios, US and Israeli officials) and presenting both sides' statements, using factual reporting to appear objective.
The Southeast Asian bloc omits the internal Israeli skepticism and the deeper historical context of occupation, which would add complexity to the neutral frame.
Broaden your view
T. rex fossil 'Gus' sells for $50.1 million, resetting the market for dinosaur skeletons
7 languages · 18 outlets
From TechnologySoyuz Docks as US and Russia Extend ISS Lifespan to 2030
3 languages · 9 outlets
From Science & HealthFirst true sugar detected in interstellar space, as deep-time studies reshape origins debate
3 languages · 6 outlets