Sign in
Edition of 06:00 CETSunday, July 19, 2026
311 outlets · 17 languages243 briefings today
SportThursday, July 2, 2026

UEFA Rejects Automatic Red Cards for Mouth-Covering, Opts for Referee Discretion

European football’s governing body declines to adopt FIFA’s controversial rule, instructing officials to assess each incident individually and consider yellow cards instead.

UEFA confirmed on Thursday that it will not implement the International Football Association Board (IFAB) regulation mandating red cards for players who cover their mouths during on-field confrontations. The decision, communicated to member associations, means referees in the Champions League, Europa League, and Conference League will retain the authority to evaluate each situation on its own merits. Where a player is deemed to have concealed communication as an act of unsporting behaviour, a yellow card may be shown, but automatic dismissals will not occur. The governing body stressed that this approach does not prejudice subsequent disciplinary investigations.

The rule’s genesis lies in a February Champions League fixture between Benfica and Real Madrid, when Benfica winger Gianluca Prestianni raised his shirt to cover his mouth while speaking to Vinícius Júnior. The Brazilian forward alleged racist abuse, triggering a UEFA probe. Although no in-game sanction was applied, Prestianni was later found guilty of homophobic conduct and handed a six-match ban, three of which were suspended. The incident prompted FIFA president Gianni Infantino to champion a deterrent measure, and IFAB approved the optional law in April, permitting referees to issue straight red cards for the gesture during confrontations.

At the 2026 World Cup, the rule has been actively enforced. Paraguay’s Miguel Almirón became the first player sent off under the new provision in a group-stage match against Turkey, and Ecuador defender Piero Hincapié was dismissed after a VAR review in a last-16 defeat to co-hosts Mexico. Yet its application has not been uniform: England’s Jude Bellingham was not sanctioned when he covered his mouth while speaking to Ghana’s Jordan Ayew, with officials judging the exchange non-hostile. Viewed from South American football circles, the dismissals have sharpened debate over a law that critics argue inverts the presumption of innocence and could be exploited to provoke unjust expulsions.

While rejecting the mouth-covering red card, UEFA will adopt another IFAB option: VAR reviews of incorrectly awarded corners, a tool that has already reversed 22 decisions into goal-kicks at the World Cup. The confederation will not, however, enforce the rule allowing red cards for players who leave the field in protest at a referee’s decision. The selective adoption underscores a divergence in regulatory philosophy between Zurich and Nyon, with European competitions set to proceed under a framework that prioritises referee judgement over mandatory dismissals when the new season begins.

Broaden your view

Read more
Breaking
Courts and Legislatures Across Continents Move to Entrench Protections for Children and the Environment·Kyiv Endures Record Russian Ballistic Missile Salvo, One Dead and Fires Across the City·Ageing populations strain care systems as technology and finance scramble to adapt·US-Saudi Nuclear Draft Permits Enrichment Without IAEA Protocol·Argentine fans turn Times Square into a carnival on eve of World Cup final·AI Recasts Employment and Social Trust, From Hiring Screens to Call Centres·England Withstand Mbappé’s Onslaught to Seize Bronze in Ten-Goal Spectacle·Canadian Military to Airlift 600 from Remote Ontario Community as Wildfire Smoke Blankets US·Courts and Legislatures Across Continents Move to Entrench Protections for Children and the Environment·Kyiv Endures Record Russian Ballistic Missile Salvo, One Dead and Fires Across the City·Ageing populations strain care systems as technology and finance scramble to adapt·US-Saudi Nuclear Draft Permits Enrichment Without IAEA Protocol·Argentine fans turn Times Square into a carnival on eve of World Cup final·AI Recasts Employment and Social Trust, From Hiring Screens to Call Centres·England Withstand Mbappé’s Onslaught to Seize Bronze in Ten-Goal Spectacle·Canadian Military to Airlift 600 from Remote Ontario Community as Wildfire Smoke Blankets US·
Upd. 02:42 AM5 languages · 7 outlets
7 outlets|5 languages|2 min read
Thursday, July 2, 2026

UEFA Rejects Automatic Red Cards for Mouth-Covering, Opts for Referee Discretion

European football’s governing body declines to adopt FIFA’s controversial rule, instructing officials to assess each incident individually and consider yellow cards instead.

UEFA confirmed on Thursday that it will not implement the International Football Association Board (IFAB) regulation mandating red cards for players who cover their mouths during on-field confrontations. The decision, communicated to member associations, means referees in the Champions League, Europa League, and Conference League will retain the authority to evaluate each situation on its own merits. Where a player is deemed to have concealed communication as an act of unsporting behaviour, a yellow card may be shown, but automatic dismissals will not occur. The governing body stressed that this approach does not prejudice subsequent disciplinary investigations.

The rule’s genesis lies in a February Champions League fixture between Benfica and Real Madrid, when Benfica winger Gianluca Prestianni raised his shirt to cover his mouth while speaking to Vinícius Júnior. The Brazilian forward alleged racist abuse, triggering a UEFA probe. Although no in-game sanction was applied, Prestianni was later found guilty of homophobic conduct and handed a six-match ban, three of which were suspended. The incident prompted FIFA president Gianni Infantino to champion a deterrent measure, and IFAB approved the optional law in April, permitting referees to issue straight red cards for the gesture during confrontations.

At the 2026 World Cup, the rule has been actively enforced. Paraguay’s Miguel Almirón became the first player sent off under the new provision in a group-stage match against Turkey, and Ecuador defender Piero Hincapié was dismissed after a VAR review in a last-16 defeat to co-hosts Mexico. Yet its application has not been uniform: England’s Jude Bellingham was not sanctioned when he covered his mouth while speaking to Ghana’s Jordan Ayew, with officials judging the exchange non-hostile. Viewed from South American football circles, the dismissals have sharpened debate over a law that critics argue inverts the presumption of innocence and could be exploited to provoke unjust expulsions.

While rejecting the mouth-covering red card, UEFA will adopt another IFAB option: VAR reviews of incorrectly awarded corners, a tool that has already reversed 22 decisions into goal-kicks at the World Cup. The confederation will not, however, enforce the rule allowing red cards for players who leave the field in protest at a referee’s decision. The selective adoption underscores a divergence in regulatory philosophy between Zurich and Nyon, with European competitions set to proceed under a framework that prioritises referee judgement over mandatory dismissals when the new season begins.

Source divergence

Sport · 7 outlets · 5 languages

0%Low

How sources tell the same facts differently.

How They Split

Critical100%

This story appeared in

7 outlets · 5 languages

Broaden your view

From Geopolitics & Politics

New York Mayor Reviews Legal Basis to Arrest Netanyahu During UN Visit

12 languages · 38 outlets

From Economy & Markets

Argentine household credit stress deepens as emerging markets navigate divergent financial pressures

5 languages · 8 outlets

From Technology

India’s private sector reaches orbit on first attempt with Vikram-1 rocket

4 languages · 6 outlets

Read more