
War, bullying, and AI reshape Asia's exam halls and classrooms
From Iran's war-zone exam schedule to India's two-board experiment and Indonesia's school bomb response, education systems are being forced to rethink safety, flexibility, and purpose.
Iran’s Ministry of Education has ruled out a nationwide postponement of final school examinations, affecting 1.5 million students, despite active conflict in four provinces where roughly 150,000 candidates reside. The decision, announced by Minister Alireza Kazemi after consultations with security bodies and the Supreme Examinations Council, means 90% of students will sit exams as scheduled, while those in war-affected areas follow a staggered, subject-by-subject timetable. Officials in Tehran argue that a blanket delay would have disrupted the entire academic calendar and forced all students to sit both internal and external exams later, doubling the burden. The ministry has set a 15 Shahrivar deadline for completion, after which schools in conflict zones may switch to teacher-led internal assessments. Standardised question papers—20% difficult, 60% medium, 20% easy—are designed to ensure comparability, though concerns about fairness persist among families in both war and safe provinces.
India’s Central Board of Secondary Education, meanwhile, has just released results from its new two-board system for Class X, introduced under the National Education Policy 2020. Of the 5.1 lakh students who opted for the optional second examination, nearly 3.1 lakh improved their scores, lifting the overall pass percentage to 96.8%. The policy allows students to retain the higher mark, explicitly designed to reduce high-stakes pressure. In Indonesia, however, the immediate challenge is physical safety. A bomb threat at a Jakarta primary school and a separate homemade explosive detonated by a bullied student at a state Islamic school in Padang have prompted psychologists to call for systematic Psychological First Aid, crisis response teams, and evidence-based bullying prevention programmes such as Olweus. In Malaysia, a public debate over boarding-school bullying has intensified, with critics demanding structural separation of junior and senior students, mandatory security cameras, and penalties for negligent wardens and administrators.
Viewed from Dhaka, the disruptions extend beyond security to the very purpose of schooling. At a literary gathering in the Bangla Academy, speakers argued that sustainable development is impossible without cultural refinement, warning that infrastructure alone cannot civilise a society. The Dubai International Writing Programme, a state-backed initiative to discover and train Arab literary talent, embodies a parallel conviction: that investment in creativity is a long-term knowledge asset. Meanwhile, a survey by Monster.com cited in Bangladeshi media found that 57% of workers now prioritise job stability over rapid promotion, as artificial intelligence reshapes employment. Business analysts in Dhaka note that psychometric testing is gaining traction in hiring, shifting emphasis from credentials to adaptability and emotional intelligence.
Iran’s exam timetable remains the most immediate test of whether systems can balance continuity with compassion. The ministry’s next milestone is the 15 Shahrivar cutoff; failure to complete exams by then would trigger a switch to internal assessment, a move that could complicate university admissions. Across the region, the common thread is a recognition that education must now manage not only academic assessment but also psychological safety, cultural identity, and the employability of a generation entering an AI-disrupted labour market.
| Indian & South Asian press | −0.30 | critical |
|---|---|---|
| Continental European press | −0.60 | critical |
| Atlantic / Anglosphere press | −0.70 | critical |
Change is inevitable, but the key is worker trust and upskilling.
By presenting concrete transformations (customer care, careers), the idea that AI requires gradual adjustment is normalized.
Extreme risks like child abuse or employer surveillance are not addressed.
Employers use AI to spy on candidates; privacy is at risk.
By describing the scenario as a personal privacy violation, indignation against companies is mobilized.
It does not mention that AI can also help find jobs or that privacy laws exist in some countries.
The Indian community is targeted by racist hate online; platforms are not doing enough.
By telling a personal story (Mohit Sharma) and citing like counts, a victim-perpetrator narrative is created.
The role of AI in content moderation or Meta's initiatives to counter hate are not discussed.
Broaden your view
Trump guarantees Netanyahu will not be arrested on US soil, countering New York mayor’s ICC enforcement talk
9 languages · 22 outlets
From Economy & MarketsBrent crude tops $90 for first time since June as US-Iran strikes intensify
8 languages · 21 outlets
From Science & HealthGlobal road deaths fall 21% since 2011, but Africa records 17% rise
4 languages · 9 outlets