
Israel defies US call to withdraw from Lebanon, Syria and Gaza ‘security zones’
Defence minister Katz tells Pentagon counterpart that troops will remain, as Netanyahu delays Washington trip and US-Israel coordination on Iran continues.
Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz, in a phone call with US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, stated that Israel is determined to maintain its military presence in what it terms “security zones” inside Lebanon, Syria and the Gaza Strip. The call, confirmed by Katz’s office on Thursday, also covered US military operations against Iran, with both sides agreeing to continue coordination in the face of any further regional developments.
Katz’s office said the minister emphasised that the deployments are a “central lesson” from the events of 7 October and are necessary to protect Israeli borders and communities from “jihadist forces”. He added that Israel has never asked the United States to act on its behalf along its frontiers. The statement comes days after the news site Axios reported that President Donald Trump, during a phone call with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, urged Israel to redeploy its forces out of Syria and Lebanon, arguing that the presence was fuelling tensions. According to a US official cited by Axios, Trump told Netanyahu, “They don’t want you there. You should redeploy.” The Israeli prime minister’s office later confirmed that Netanyahu had raised the need for security zones along Israel’s borders during the conversation.
In Lebanon, Israeli forces remain deployed in a roughly 10‑kilometre-deep zone, while US‑brokered talks in Rome this week were described as “positive” and are expected to lead to the implementation of “pilot zones” from which Israeli troops would withdraw. Lebanese officials have demanded a clear timetable for further pullbacks. In Syria, Israel moved troops into a UN‑patrolled buffer zone after the fall of the Assad government in December 2024 and has since carried out repeated incursions and airstrikes, citing the need for a demilitarised south. Syrian citizens have staged protests against the Israeli presence, and Washington views the deployment as a potential trigger for escalation. In Gaza, the Israeli military controls 60 per cent of the territory and maintains a perimeter presence along the borders with Israel and Egypt.
The Katz‑Hegseth call also served to align positions on Iran, where the United States has conducted military operations that, according to Israeli and American readouts, were briefed to the Israeli side. Regional media in Iran have highlighted that the US and Israel failed to achieve their declared objectives in two recent rounds of hostilities, while Israeli sources claim that the second war resulted in the killing of Iran’s supreme leader and senior commanders. Against this backdrop, Netanyahu has postponed a planned trip to Washington next week after the funeral of US Senator Lindsey Graham was rescheduled for the end of the month. The Rome talks on Lebanon are set to continue, but no date has been announced for an Israeli withdrawal from the pilot zones, and Katz has conditioned any pullback on the full disarmament of Hezbollah across Lebanon.
| Iranian & allied press | −0.80 | critical |
|---|---|---|
| Israeli press | +0.70 | aligned |
| Continental European press | −0.40 | critical |
Iran denounces the Israeli presence as a threat to regional sovereignty and a strategic failure.
By recalling past defeats of Israel and the US in Iran, it builds a narrative of inevitable failure for current operations.
It omits the jihadist threats that Israel cites as justification, nor the US pressure for withdrawal.
Israel asserts its right to self-defense and the necessity of remaining in security zones to protect its citizens from jihadist threats.
By emphasizing the jihadist threat as the primary justification, it creates a hierarchy of priorities that legitimizes the military presence.
It omits the US pressure for withdrawal and the international criticism that labels the zones as a creeping occupation.
Europe criticizes the Israeli presence as a creeping occupation and highlights the divergence with the United States, which is calling for a withdrawal.
By framing the Israeli presence as a creeping occupation, it applies universal international norms to delegitimize the Israeli action.
It omits the specific jihadist threats that Israel cites as justification, nor Israel's statement that it did not ask the US to act on its behalf.
Broaden your view
Hamas Elects Khalil al-Hayya as Political Chief, Signalling Hardline Continuity
9 languages · 30 outlets
From Economy & MarketsBrent crude tops $90 for first time since June as US-Iran strikes intensify
8 languages · 21 outlets
From TechnologyChina’s Kimi K3 model jolts markets, then hits compute ceiling
7 languages · 10 outlets