Sign in
Edition of 06:00 CETMonday, July 20, 2026
311 outlets · 17 languages261 briefings today
Media & EntertainmentFriday, July 10, 2026

As Viewers Drift Away, Netflix Tests Free Trials and Linear Channels

The streaming pioneer that invented binge-watching is now experimenting with live TV, third-party apps, and free access to win back engagement.

In São Paulo, a smartphone screen glows with an unfamiliar invitation: “Start your free trial.” For the first time in six years, Netflix is offering a no-cost taste of its catalogue to select Brazilians—some for seven days, others for a full month. The test, confirmed by the company as a limited A/B experiment, marks a quiet retreat from the self-assurance of a platform that once saw no need to give away what everyone wanted. It is one of several tentative pivots now rippling through the streaming giant, from plans for always-on linear channels to the integration of rival services like Peacock inside its own app, all discussed at the most recent annual strategy meeting, according to reports in the American business press.

Behind the experiments lies a problem that executives in Los Gatos have long downplayed: audiences are not sticking around. Data analysed in Milan show that most Netflix series lose viewers sharply after their first season. The second outing of One Piece shed 30 per cent of its audience; Beef lost 58 per cent; The Four Seasons 63 per cent. An Italian thriller titled Come uccidono le brave ragazze saw an 80 per cent collapse. By contrast, on HBO Max, House of the Dragon dropped a modest 8 per cent between its second and third seasons, while Apple TV+ and Disney+ have built shows that grow their audiences year after year. Netflix’s own exceptions—Bridgerton, Stranger Things—only underscore the broader trend. The company’s shares have fallen more than 40 per cent since August 2025, and its share of American television viewing slipped to 7.8 per cent in April, a low not seen in over a year.

This is the same company that, with the release of House of Cards in 2013, taught the world to binge. The all-at-once drop was not just a distribution choice; it was a cultural statement, a rejection of the weekly rhythms that had governed television since its birth. Now, viewed from London and New York, the strategic signals point in the opposite direction. Netflix has begun adding live sports, reality formats, and even podcasts tied to its series. It is reconsidering the binge model itself. The linear channels under discussion would stream films and shows by genre in a continuous flow, a format indistinguishable from the cable television that Netflix once set out to disrupt. The potential inclusion of third-party platforms like NBCUniversal’s Peacock within the Netflix interface—mirroring the aggregator approach of Apple and Amazon—further blurs the line between a bold content creator and a utility.

In Germany, the top-ten charts still brim with fresh titles: a comedy starring John Cena as a rigid real-estate agent upended by his chaotic brother, a Korean spy thriller about a retired agent forced back into action. These hits generate buzz, but they have not reversed the engagement drift. The company’s 325 million global subscribers, swollen by the crackdown on password sharing, mask a quieter metric: total hours watched each month are growing far more slowly than the subscriber count would suggest. CEO Ted Sarandos has publicly dismissed the second-season drop-off as unimportant, yet the flurry of trials—free access, live channels, sports rights, ad-supported tiers—tells a different story. In São Paulo, a user taps “Start Free Trial” and enters a platform that is, piece by piece, reassembling the television experience it once dismantled.

Divergence — who tells it how
17%Low
4 blocs · positions from −0.30 to +0.10
CriticalFavorable
RUSATLEURCIN
Divergence between press blocs
Russian & CIS press−0.30critical
Atlantic / Anglosphere press+0.10neutral
Continental European press−0.20neutral
Chinese press0.00neutral
The press outlets that directly represent Netflix are not present in this cluster.
Russian & CIS press−0.30
Voice

Netflix is in trouble and seeks an escape in the traditional TV model.

Mechanismriproiezione

The narrative emphasizes negative data (stock drop, engagement decline) to justify the move as necessary, creating a sense of urgency.

Omission

It does not mention the possibility of bundling with other streaming services, which could offer an alternative strategy.

AlarmPragmatism
Atlantic / Anglosphere press+0.10
Voice

Netflix adapts to the market with innovative moves.

Mechanismuniversalizzazione

The narrative normalizes change as part of industry evolution, avoiding emphasis on difficulties.

Omission

It omits the extent of the stock drop (40%) and engagement loss, which could make the moves appear reactive.

PragmatismDetachment
Continental European press−0.20
Voice

Netflix cannot retain its audience after the first season.

Mechanismstrutturalizzazione

The narrative generalizes a retention problem to all series, using data to create a narrative of inevitable decline.

Omission

It does not mention the live channel or bundling initiatives, which could address the problem.

SkepticismPragmatism
Chinese press0.00
Voice

Netflix explores new strategies to counter declining engagement.

Mechanismdistanziamento

The narrative limits itself to reporting facts without judgment, lending credibility to sources.

Omission

It does not mention the free trial tests in some countries, which is another strategy to attract users.

PragmatismDetachment

Broaden your view

Read more
Breaking
Spain and Argentina Stalemated at 0-0, Enzo Fernandez Red Card Forces Extra Time·Tropical Storm Fausto Forms in Pacific as Gulf Depression Threatens US Coast·Iran puts chance of peace with US at 10% but insists talks must continue·Jordan Summons Iranian Envoy as Gulf States Condemn Attacks on Civilian Infrastructure·Strategy quality has fallen 40% in 15 years, forcing a global shift from ambition to execution·Lamine Yamal etches name in history with World Cup win at 19·Scaloni’s Tears and Doubts Overshadow Argentina’s World Cup Final Defeat·Messi in Tears as Spain End Argentina’s Reign in Extra-Time World Cup Final·Spain and Argentina Stalemated at 0-0, Enzo Fernandez Red Card Forces Extra Time·Tropical Storm Fausto Forms in Pacific as Gulf Depression Threatens US Coast·Iran puts chance of peace with US at 10% but insists talks must continue·Jordan Summons Iranian Envoy as Gulf States Condemn Attacks on Civilian Infrastructure·Strategy quality has fallen 40% in 15 years, forcing a global shift from ambition to execution·Lamine Yamal etches name in history with World Cup win at 19·Scaloni’s Tears and Doubts Overshadow Argentina’s World Cup Final Defeat·Messi in Tears as Spain End Argentina’s Reign in Extra-Time World Cup Final·
Upd. 12:16 PM6 languages · 6 outlets
PreviousMedia & EntertainmentNext
6 outlets|6 languages|3 min read
Friday, July 10, 2026

As Viewers Drift Away, Netflix Tests Free Trials and Linear Channels

The streaming pioneer that invented binge-watching is now experimenting with live TV, third-party apps, and free access to win back engagement.

In São Paulo, a smartphone screen glows with an unfamiliar invitation: “Start your free trial.” For the first time in six years, Netflix is offering a no-cost taste of its catalogue to select Brazilians—some for seven days, others for a full month. The test, confirmed by the company as a limited A/B experiment, marks a quiet retreat from the self-assurance of a platform that once saw no need to give away what everyone wanted. It is one of several tentative pivots now rippling through the streaming giant, from plans for always-on linear channels to the integration of rival services like Peacock inside its own app, all discussed at the most recent annual strategy meeting, according to reports in the American business press.

Behind the experiments lies a problem that executives in Los Gatos have long downplayed: audiences are not sticking around. Data analysed in Milan show that most Netflix series lose viewers sharply after their first season. The second outing of One Piece shed 30 per cent of its audience; Beef lost 58 per cent; The Four Seasons 63 per cent. An Italian thriller titled Come uccidono le brave ragazze saw an 80 per cent collapse. By contrast, on HBO Max, House of the Dragon dropped a modest 8 per cent between its second and third seasons, while Apple TV+ and Disney+ have built shows that grow their audiences year after year. Netflix’s own exceptions—Bridgerton, Stranger Things—only underscore the broader trend. The company’s shares have fallen more than 40 per cent since August 2025, and its share of American television viewing slipped to 7.8 per cent in April, a low not seen in over a year.

This is the same company that, with the release of House of Cards in 2013, taught the world to binge. The all-at-once drop was not just a distribution choice; it was a cultural statement, a rejection of the weekly rhythms that had governed television since its birth. Now, viewed from London and New York, the strategic signals point in the opposite direction. Netflix has begun adding live sports, reality formats, and even podcasts tied to its series. It is reconsidering the binge model itself. The linear channels under discussion would stream films and shows by genre in a continuous flow, a format indistinguishable from the cable television that Netflix once set out to disrupt. The potential inclusion of third-party platforms like NBCUniversal’s Peacock within the Netflix interface—mirroring the aggregator approach of Apple and Amazon—further blurs the line between a bold content creator and a utility.

In Germany, the top-ten charts still brim with fresh titles: a comedy starring John Cena as a rigid real-estate agent upended by his chaotic brother, a Korean spy thriller about a retired agent forced back into action. These hits generate buzz, but they have not reversed the engagement drift. The company’s 325 million global subscribers, swollen by the crackdown on password sharing, mask a quieter metric: total hours watched each month are growing far more slowly than the subscriber count would suggest. CEO Ted Sarandos has publicly dismissed the second-season drop-off as unimportant, yet the flurry of trials—free access, live channels, sports rights, ad-supported tiers—tells a different story. In São Paulo, a user taps “Start Free Trial” and enters a platform that is, piece by piece, reassembling the television experience it once dismantled.

Divergence — who tells it how
17%Low
4 blocs · positions from −0.30 to +0.10
CriticalFavorable
RUSATLEURCIN
Divergence between press blocs
Russian & CIS press−0.30critical
Atlantic / Anglosphere press+0.10neutral
Continental European press−0.20neutral
Chinese press0.00neutral
The press outlets that directly represent Netflix are not present in this cluster.
Russian & CIS press−0.30
Voice

Netflix is in trouble and seeks an escape in the traditional TV model.

Mechanismriproiezione

The narrative emphasizes negative data (stock drop, engagement decline) to justify the move as necessary, creating a sense of urgency.

Omission

It does not mention the possibility of bundling with other streaming services, which could offer an alternative strategy.

AlarmPragmatism
Atlantic / Anglosphere press+0.10
Voice

Netflix adapts to the market with innovative moves.

Mechanismuniversalizzazione

The narrative normalizes change as part of industry evolution, avoiding emphasis on difficulties.

Omission

It omits the extent of the stock drop (40%) and engagement loss, which could make the moves appear reactive.

PragmatismDetachment
Continental European press−0.20
Voice

Netflix cannot retain its audience after the first season.

Mechanismstrutturalizzazione

The narrative generalizes a retention problem to all series, using data to create a narrative of inevitable decline.

Omission

It does not mention the live channel or bundling initiatives, which could address the problem.

SkepticismPragmatism
Chinese press0.00
Voice

Netflix explores new strategies to counter declining engagement.

Mechanismdistanziamento

The narrative limits itself to reporting facts without judgment, lending credibility to sources.

Omission

It does not mention the free trial tests in some countries, which is another strategy to attract users.

PragmatismDetachment

This story appeared in

6 outlets · 6 languages

Broaden your view

From Geopolitics & Politics

New York Mayor Reviews Legal Basis to Arrest Netanyahu During UN Visit

9 languages · 17 outlets

From Economy & Markets

Argentine household credit stress deepens as emerging markets navigate divergent financial pressures

5 languages · 8 outlets

From Technology

AI as Therapist and Matchmaker: The Global Surge in Intimate Digital Reliance

5 languages · 9 outlets

Read more