
伊朗威胁打击英国基地,伦敦启动全天候防御
英国允许美军使用其基地对伊朗实施空袭后,德黑兰宣布相关资产为“合法目标”,英国随即启动全天候多层防空戒备。
伊朗革命卫队7月23日发表声明,称因英国允许美军B-1轰炸机从格洛斯特郡的费尔福德皇家空军基地起飞攻击伊朗本土,该基地及任何被用于侵略伊朗的英国资产都将被视为“合法目标”。这是美伊冲突首次将欧洲领土直接拉入军事威胁范围。同日,英国政府发言人宣布,武装部队已进入全天候戒备状态,并与北约盟国协调,启动多层防空反导体系,以应对“任何来自境外的攻击”。
德黑兰方面通过军事和外交渠道同时施压。革命卫队第46号声明指出,美军在耗尽印度洋舰艇的巡航导弹库存后,转而启用驻英战略轰炸机,这一举动改变了冲突的地理边界。伊朗外交部则谴责伦敦的决定“公然违反联合国宪章”,根据联大第3314号决议,构成侵略行为的共谋,并警告任何参与方都将承担后果。与此同时,伊朗向科威特、约旦等驻有美军的邻国发布安抚性声明,强调其打击仅针对美军控制区,并非针对“兄弟国家”,试图分化地区反应。
伦敦的立场维持一贯的模糊平衡。新任首相伯纳姆沿袭前任斯塔默的政策,授权美军使用迪戈加西亚和费尔福德基地实施“防御性打击”,目标是对霍尔木兹海峡航运构成威胁的伊朗导弹阵地。英国政府强调此举属“集体自卫”,不改变其在冲突中的总体方针——既保卫人民、利益与盟友,又避免被拖入更广泛的战争。但这一决定已在英国内部引起反弹,绿党和自由民主党指责政府使英国沦为“战争罪同谋”,而英国也临时撤离了驻伊朗的外交人员。
在华盛顿,总统特朗普对媒体表示,正考虑发起比“史诗之怒”行动规模更大的作战,并威胁若伊朗继续攻击红海油轮,将让其“付出沉重代价”。自6月停火协议破裂以来,美军已对伊朗连续进行十二天轰炸,伊朗则对科威特、巴林、约旦等国的美军目标实施报复。冲突外溢至英国领土的前景,可能促使北约更深度介入,加剧全球能源市场和航运安全的不确定性。目前,外交对话渠道收窄,霍尔木兹海峡的航行自由成为各方角力的焦点,波斯湾国家陷入两难,而伊朗核问题的谈判窗口正在关闭。
| 伊朗及相关媒体 | −0.90 | critical |
|---|---|---|
| 阿拉伯海湾媒体 | +0.40 | aligned |
| 大西洋/英语圈媒体 | 0.00 | neutral |
Iran slams the UK for enabling US illegal military attacks and warns of consequences, reserving the right to self-defense under international law.
Iran legitimizes its stance by invoking international law, citing UN Resolution 3314 to frame the UK's action as aggression, thus turning a geopolitical dispute into a legal matter.
It omits that US strikes were already underway and that RAF Fairford was used for B-1 bombers, downplaying the Iranian threat as a reaction to an ongoing offensive.
The UK prepares to defend itself after Iran's threat, emphasizing the full readiness of its armed forces and coordination with NATO. The tone is reassuring and aimed at deterrence, with implicit skepticism about Iran's ability to carry out the threat. Britain's response is portrayed as measured and in line with collective defense obligations.
The UK confirms its military readiness after Iran's threat, while Iran justifies its warning as a response to US use of British bases. The story is presented in a balanced manner, reporting statements from both sides without clear alignment. The Iranian justification is given space, as is the UK defensive response, with a mention of NATO cooperation.