
从意大利渔村到英国海滨:当“过度旅游”遇上“着装警察”
从科莫湖畔的比基尼禁令到法国海滩的禁象令,欧洲旅游小镇正用罚款和规则对抗游客的不文明行为,折射出全球旅游热潮下的文化冲突。
一列闷热的英国火车车厢里,挤满了几乎全裸的度假者,他们只穿着比基尼或赤裸上身,皮肤黏湿,让本地居民海伦·科菲感到不适。这不是虚构,而是《独立报》记者在前往福克斯通海滨的真实经历。她写道:“我蜷缩在角落,每次有人擦过我,我都畏缩。”这一幕,正是全球许多旅游目的地居民的共同感受。
就在几天前,意大利科莫湖畔的小渔村瓦伦纳出台新规:在公共区域赤裸上身或只穿泳装者,将被罚款50至200欧元。市长毛罗·曼佐尼对媒体表示:“居民的生活质量不能成为大众旅游的祭品。”这个仅有650名居民的小镇,旺季每日游客可达1.75万人,是常住人口的25倍。新规还包括限制旅行团人数不超过25人,禁止导游使用扩音器,违者罚款100至400欧元,屡犯者可能被暂停执业3至12个月。
瓦伦纳并非孤例。意大利多地早已展开“文明着装”运动:索伦托对只穿泳装逛街者罚款高达500欧元,波托菲诺设立“禁止等待区”并对在特定区域自拍者罚款275欧元,威尼斯对赤裸上身者罚款可达350欧元,罗马的罚金则在250至400欧元之间。在撒丁岛,带走沙子或贝壳可能面临3500欧元罚款,甚至使用毛巾时若未铺底垫也会被禁止,以防沙子被带走。这些措施背后,是当地人对“过度旅游”侵蚀日常生活空间的焦虑。意大利消费者协会指出,私人海滩的遮阳伞和躺椅价格五年内上涨了50%,但法律仍允许游客自带食物,因为“海洋是公共财产,不能成为奢侈品”,普利亚大区主席安东尼奥·德卡罗如此强调。
这股“规则浪潮”并不限于意大利。西班牙约600个海滩禁烟,法国对吸烟者罚款135欧元,澳大利亚邦迪海滩禁酒,美国加州德尔马海滩禁止挖超过60厘米的沙坑,新泽西州开普梅海滩规定比基尼只能在早7点至晚7点穿着。在亚洲,日本许多海滩虽未明文禁止纹身,但因历史原因,纹身者常被要求遮盖或离开;印度果阿海滩则要求拍照前必须征得被摄者同意,便衣警察会巡逻检查。在中国,随着国内旅游爆发式增长,三亚、丽江等地的居民也开始抱怨游客行为失范,但尚未出现如此细化的着装禁令。这些规定在社交媒体上引发两极反应:有游客抱怨“度假变成了考试”,但当地商家和居民大多支持,认为这有助于恢复公共空间的体面。
回到瓦伦纳,狭窄的鹅卵石街道上,导游不再举着喇叭,游客们穿着整齐的衬衫或连衣裙,在湖边漫步。远处,沙滩上依然允许泳装,但一旦踏上通往教堂或广场的石阶,就必须披上外衣。这种边界,像一道无形的门,将度假的放纵与日常的尊严隔开。正如一位当地店主所说:“在沙滩上,你可以随心所欲;但当你走进商店、餐厅、教堂或广场时,你必须穿着得体。”这或许不是对自由的限制,而是对“共享空间”的重新定义。
| 欧洲大陆媒体 | −0.30 | critical |
|---|---|---|
| 俄罗斯及独联体媒体 | 0.00 | neutral |
| 大西洋/英语圈媒体 | +0.50 | aligned |
Rules are becoming increasingly absurd, but the problem of mass tourism is real: a balance between decorum and freedom must be found.
By juxtaposing various news items about bizarre rules from across Europe, the impression of a rampant and out-of-control phenomenon is created, normalizing the alarm.
The perspective of tourists who might feel penalized by excessive rules is not explored, nor is the positive economic impact of tourism discussed.
In Italy, in the village of Varenna, fines have been introduced for walking around in swimwear in public areas, with penalties from €50 to €200.
The news is reported without commentary or contextualization, presenting the rules as a fact, which normalizes them without judgment.
The overtourism context that led to these rules is not mentioned, nor are the reactions of residents or tourists.
We should adopt the same fines for bad beach behavior: here are seven habits that deserve penalties.
The author uses the Italian example as a pretext for a humorous list of behaviors to fine, turning a local news item into a personal and ironic policy proposal.
The reason why the Italian village introduced the fines (overtourism, protection of residents) is not explained, making the proposal superficial and decontextualized.