
Ukraine Parliament Approves Energy Chief as PM Amid Protests Over Defence Minister’s Dismissal
The appointment of Serhii Koretskyi as prime minister, part of a wider reshuffle, has triggered street protests after the removal of popular Defence Minister Mykhailo Fedorov.
Ukraine’s parliament voted on 16 July 2026 to confirm Serhii Koretskyi, the head of state energy company Naftogaz, as the country’s new prime minister, with 289 deputies backing the nomination. The vote followed the resignation of Yulia Svyrydenko, who had led the government for exactly one year, and forms part of a sweeping cabinet overhaul initiated by President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. As the parliamentary session took place, hundreds of demonstrators gathered outside the building in Kyiv to protest the simultaneous dismissal of Defence Minister Mykhailo Fedorov, who was removed after only six months in the post.
According to statements from the presidential administration, Zelenskyy selected Koretskyi because his record in the energy sector made him the best-prepared candidate to steer the country through another winter of expected Russian strikes on power infrastructure. Addressing lawmakers before the vote, Koretskyi stressed that his tenure at Naftogaz had shown public management could be efficient and pledged to bring “responsibility, professionalism and fair rules” to government. The decision to replace Fedorov, however, drew sharp condemnation. Protesters in Kyiv and other cities, including war veterans and serving soldiers, carried signs reading “Fedorov is the defence minister” and “Do not change what works,” while chanting “Shame.” Ukrainian military reform advocates and some lawmakers warned that removing a minister who had expanded drone procurement and blocked Russian access to Starlink could disrupt defence modernisation at a critical moment.
Viewed from Western capitals, the reshuffle has generated unease. European diplomatic sources, cited by Italian media, expressed perplexity at the dismissal of a figure credited with deepening cooperation with NATO allies. Analysts in London note that the move may signal Zelenskyy’s attempt to tighten his grip on the war effort ahead of a possible electoral cycle, though no date has been set. The protests, which prompted the pro-government outlet United24 Media to suspend publications in solidarity, point to a widening rift between the presidential office and segments of civil society and the armed forces.
Under Ukrainian law, the prime minister’s resignation automatically dissolved the entire cabinet, opening the way for a broader reconfiguration. Koretskyi, 48, who had no prior political experience, now faces the immediate task of hardening the energy grid while managing the political fallout from the defence portfolio. Parliament is expected to approve further appointments later on Thursday, with Interior Minister Ihor Klymenko widely tipped to become the next defence minister, though no official confirmation has been issued. The dossier remains open as the new government takes shape amid ongoing hostilities.
| Indian & South Asian press | 0.00 | neutral |
|---|---|---|
| Continental European press | −0.50 | critical |
| Latin American press | −0.20 | neutral |
The Ukrainian parliament acts routinely, approving a technocratic premier to handle energy challenges. The protests are a minor side effect.
By presenting the appointment as a technical and necessary choice, the event is normalized, downplaying the controversy and the scale of protests.
Does not mention the internal criticism within Zelensky's party nor the accusation of wanting only 'yes men'.
Zelensky is centralizing power, purging anyone who is not a 'yes man'. The popular and internal revolt shows his grip is cracking.
By personifying the state in Zelensky, a government reshuffle is transformed into a personal conflict between the president and democratic forces, making the move appear autocratic.
Does not give space to Zelensky's official justification based on Koretskyi's energy experience for the war winter.
President Zelensky changed the government without explaining why, while people protest the loss of a popular minister. The choice of a businessman raises doubts.
By highlighting the lack of explanations and the protests, judgment is suspended, inviting the reader to question whether the decision is right.
Does not mention the internal criticism within Zelensky's party nor the accusation of wanting 'yes men'.
Broaden your view
US confirms 25% tariff on Brazilian imports, exempting key commodities, as political blame game intensifies
2 languages · 14 outlets
From TechnologySpaceX Starship abort at ignition halts first post-IPO test flight
8 languages · 26 outlets
From Science & HealthBlood test detects Alzheimer’s years early as immunotherapy and lifestyle factors show promise
6 languages · 7 outlets