Trump Threatens to Destroy Iranian Bridges, Power Plants in Tit-for-Tat Over Hormuz Attacks
The US president warned of strikes on civilian infrastructure for each Iranian attack on shipping, as an 11th night of US air strikes hit Iran and the conflict widened across the Gulf.
President Donald Trump declared on Wednesday that the United States would bomb and destroy one Iranian bridge or power plant for every future attack on a vessel in the Strait of Hormuz, a threat he posted on his Truth Social network. The statement specified that targets would include facilities “located next to, or in, the Capital City of Tehran” and would be triggered by any Iranian use of missiles, rockets, drones or other weapons against shipping. The warning came as the US military carried out an eleventh consecutive night of air strikes on Iranian territory, which the US Central Command said were aimed at degrading Iran’s ability to threaten commercial navigation.
Viewed from Washington, the threat formalises a pattern of retaliation that has intensified since a preliminary ceasefire collapsed in early June. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking at a Southeast Asian ministers’ meeting in Manila, said the US remained open to negotiations but assessed that Iran was “not serious about talks”. The Pentagon has requested an additional $67 billion in emergency funding, with Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth telling Congress the war has already cost $37.5 billion. Trump dismissed domestic polls showing the conflict is unpopular, insisting that Americans “are not against the war”, even as rising oil prices push up the cost of living ahead of November’s midterm elections.
Iranian and allied responses have widened the geographic scope of the fighting. Iran’s Tasnim news agency reported that a US missile struck Larak island inside the strait on Wednesday afternoon. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps claimed attacks on US bases in Jordan, Kuwait and Bahrain, while Kuwait’s military said it intercepted hostile drones and Jordan reported shooting down four Iranian missiles and four drones. In Yemen, the Iran-backed Houthi movement threatened a blockade of Saudi oil shipments through the Red Sea, a move that helped push benchmark Brent crude above $94 a barrel. Iran’s foreign ministry spokesman, Esmaeil Baqaei, said diplomatic exchanges with Washington via mediators were continuing, but the Khatam Al-Anbiya military command warned that any US strike on the suspected nuclear site at Pickaxe Mountain would be treated as an expansion of the war.
International legal experts and UN Secretary-General António Guterres have described deliberate attacks on civilian infrastructure as unacceptable under the Geneva Conventions. The US insists it does not target civilians, though Iran’s health ministry reports 53 civilian dead and nearly 600 wounded in the latest wave of strikes. The IAEA’s director general, Rafael Grossi, told the BBC that inspectors “should be there already” to verify Iran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium. With both sides dug in over control of the strait and no new diplomatic track publicly visible, the conflict remains locked in a cycle of military action and retaliatory threats.
| Russian & CIS press | −0.70 | critical |
|---|---|---|
| Latin American press | −0.50 | critical |
| Sub-Saharan African press | −0.30 | critical |
| Atlantic / Anglosphere press | −0.20 | neutral |
Iran warns the United States that symmetrical retaliation is ready, framing its own strikes as legitimate self-defense.
The narrative presents the Iranian response as an automatic and inevitable consequence, normalizing reciprocity as a deterrent.
The Russian bloc omits the US perspective of self-defense and the ongoing diplomatic channels, which would complicate the image of unilateral aggression.
Legal experts and human rights groups condemn Trump's threat as a war crime, calling for international accountability.
The argument relies on invoking established international law and treaties, portraying the US as a violator of norms.
The Latin American bloc omits the economic cost of the conflict and the fact that the US has already spent billions, which would shift focus to material consequences rather than legal ones.
African analysts point to the staggering cost of the war and the ripple effect on global fuel prices, urging restraint.
The focus on economic data and market reactions makes the threat seem unsustainable and harmful to all parties.
The African bloc omits the legal and human rights arguments against targeting civilian infrastructure, which would add a moral condemnation to the pragmatic critique.
The White House insists on its right to defend shipping lanes, while State Department officials leave the door open for diplomacy.
The reportage juxtaposes the president's aggressive rhetoric with softer diplomatic signals, creating ambiguity about US intentions.
The Atlantic bloc omits Iran's explicit threat of symmetrical retaliation, which would make the situation appear more dangerous and less open to diplomacy.
Broaden your view
New York Mayor Concedes City Cannot Arrest Netanyahu, Urges Federal Action
9 languages · 37 outlets
From Economy & MarketsBrent crude tops $90 for first time since June as US-Iran strikes intensify
8 languages · 21 outlets
From TechnologyOpenAI Models Escape Sandbox, Autonomously Hack Hugging Face in Unprecedented Test Incident
8 languages · 51 outlets