Sign in
Edition of 20:00 CETThursday, July 9, 2026
311 outlets · 17 languages1296 briefings today
Geopolitics & PoliticsThursday, July 9, 2026

Trump’s Pledge to Sell F-35s to Turkey Alters Middle East Military Calculus

Trump’s reversal of sanctions and offer of F-35s to Ankara draws sharp Israeli opposition and faces congressional hurdles, as Turkey’s drone capabilities already project power regionally.

At the NATO summit in Ankara, US President Donald Trump announced the lifting of sanctions imposed on Turkey over its 2019 purchase of Russian S-400 air defence systems and signalled a willingness to sell Ankara F-35 stealth fighter jets. The move, which Trump described as a response to Turkey’s loyalty, reverses a policy that saw Washington expel Turkey from the F-35 programme in 2019 and impose CAATSA sanctions in 2020. The announcement was embedded in a display of personal rapport between Trump and President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, with Trump stating he attended the summit only because Erdogan was the host.

Viewed from Washington, the administration frames the shift as a step to repair ties with a NATO ally on the alliance’s southeastern flank. Turkish officials, for their part, regard the pledge as a diplomatic breakthrough that could restore access to advanced US technology and bolster Erdogan’s domestic standing amid a crackdown on the political opposition. In Jerusalem, however, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has mounted a public campaign against the sale, warning it would “destroy the balance of power in the Middle East” and describing Turkey as a regime influenced by the Muslim Brotherhood that threatens the Jewish state. Israeli defence planners, according to analysts cited in regional media, view the F-35 as a cornerstone of their qualitative military edge, and fear that Turkish acquisition would erode Israel’s air superiority and freedom of action.

Beyond the immediate triangle, the potential transfer carries wider regional implications. Turkish defence analysts note that Ankara has already demonstrated power-projection capabilities through its drone deployments in Libya, where Bayraktar TB2s and electronic warfare systems turned the tide of battle in 2019–2020 and established a permanent military footprint. An F-35 acquisition would not create a new capability from scratch but would validate and extend an existing one, potentially altering balances in the Eastern Mediterranean, Syria, and the Black Sea. In New Delhi, strategic observers point to Turkey’s deepening defence cooperation with Pakistan as a factor that could indirectly affect India’s security calculus.

The legal path to a sale, however, remains blocked by US legislation. Congress banned F-35 transfers to Turkey unless it divests the S-400 systems, and lawmakers from both parties have signalled they will oppose any executive waiver. Congressional sources indicate that a joint resolution of disapproval could be introduced, while Moscow’s end-user obligations on the S-400 deal further complicate any removal. The dossier now moves to a legislative test in Washington, where the administration’s ability to deliver on Trump’s pledge will be measured against entrenched congressional scepticism and Israel’s lobbying efforts.

Divergence — who tells it how
25%Medium
4 blocs · positions from −0.80 to −0.20
CriticalFavorable
ISRATLINDALM
Divergence between press blocs
Israeli press−0.80critical
Atlantic / Anglosphere press−0.20neutral
Indian & South Asian press−0.30critical
Arab Levant-Maghreb press−0.20neutral
Turkish press outlets are not present in this cluster.
Israeli press−0.80
Voice

Israel firmly rejects the sale of F-35s to Turkey, viewing it as an existential threat to its national security. Netanyahu personally opposes it, citing the Islamist nature of the Turkish regime.

Mechanismgerarchia di minacce

The bloc builds credibility by evoking Israel's technological and military superiority as a pillar of regional order, and presenting Turkey as a hostile and ideologically incompatible actor.

Omission

Omits the context of Turkey's NATO membership and the US desire to mend ties with a key ally, as well as the fact that Turkey was previously part of the F-35 program before sanctions.

AlarmOutrage
Atlantic / Anglosphere press−0.20
Voice

The Atlantic West cautiously observes the rapprochement between Trump and Erdogan. On one hand, it recognizes the strategic value of keeping Turkey in NATO; on the other, it warns against yielding to an ally that purchased Russian systems.

Mechanismcontrapposizione istituzionale

The bloc legitimizes its position by balancing geopolitical realism (the need to mend ties with Turkey) with the defense of institutional norms (sanctions, congressional opposition), creating a narrative of tension between executive and legislature.

Omission

Omits the Israeli perspective of existential threat and the reaction of Arab states, focusing solely on US domestic dynamics and NATO cohesion.

SkepticismPragmatismSplit voices
Indian & South Asian press−0.30
Voice

India watches with concern the sale of F-35s to Turkey, as it could strengthen Pakistan, a historical rival. The analysis focuses on implications for the regional power balance.

Mechanismcontagio strategico

The bloc builds credibility by linking the F-35 sale to Turkey with the indirect threat posed by Pakistan, using an argument of chain of alliances and technology transfer.

Omission

Omits the Israeli perspective of direct threat and Turkey's role in NATO, focusing solely on the Turkey-Pakistan axis and its implications for India.

PragmatismSkepticism
Arab Levant-Maghreb press−0.20
Voice

The Arab world sees the Israeli position as an attempt to maintain air hegemony, while Turkey has the right to strengthen its defensive capabilities.

Mechanismegemonismo

The bloc makes its criticism plausible by describing Israeli opposition as driven by selfish interests, not real security concerns, using language that dismantles Israeli claims of superiority.

Omission

Omits the context of Turkey's violation of sanctions (S-400 purchase) and Israel's genuine security concerns, presenting Israeli opposition as mere selfishness.

SkepticismOutrage

Broaden your view

Read more
Breaking
Four Years After Qatar Heartbreak, Morocco Seeks Redemption Against France·Putin Rejects Peace Talks, Prepares Escalation in Ukraine, Kremlin Sources Say·US-Iran strikes shatter truce, Strait of Hormuz traffic collapses·England’s Quansah Handed Two-Match World Cup Ban After Mexico Red Card·Florida Airport Renamed After Trump as Brand Expansion Continues·US Jobless Claims Fall to 215,000, Defying Expectations Amid Hiring Slowdown·Romário Demands Ancelotti’s Sacking After Brazil’s Earliest World Cup Exit in 36 Years·Sberbank Profit Climbs 20% as Pre-emptive Mortgage Demand Drives Russian Lending; ION Leverage Falls·Four Years After Qatar Heartbreak, Morocco Seeks Redemption Against France·Putin Rejects Peace Talks, Prepares Escalation in Ukraine, Kremlin Sources Say·US-Iran strikes shatter truce, Strait of Hormuz traffic collapses·England’s Quansah Handed Two-Match World Cup Ban After Mexico Red Card·Florida Airport Renamed After Trump as Brand Expansion Continues·US Jobless Claims Fall to 215,000, Defying Expectations Amid Hiring Slowdown·Romário Demands Ancelotti’s Sacking After Brazil’s Earliest World Cup Exit in 36 Years·Sberbank Profit Climbs 20% as Pre-emptive Mortgage Demand Drives Russian Lending; ION Leverage Falls·
Upd. 04:12 PM4 languages · 8 outlets
PreviousGeopolitics & PoliticsNext
8 outlets|4 languages|3 min read
Thursday, July 9, 2026

Trump’s Pledge to Sell F-35s to Turkey Alters Middle East Military Calculus

Trump’s reversal of sanctions and offer of F-35s to Ankara draws sharp Israeli opposition and faces congressional hurdles, as Turkey’s drone capabilities already project power regionally.

At the NATO summit in Ankara, US President Donald Trump announced the lifting of sanctions imposed on Turkey over its 2019 purchase of Russian S-400 air defence systems and signalled a willingness to sell Ankara F-35 stealth fighter jets. The move, which Trump described as a response to Turkey’s loyalty, reverses a policy that saw Washington expel Turkey from the F-35 programme in 2019 and impose CAATSA sanctions in 2020. The announcement was embedded in a display of personal rapport between Trump and President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, with Trump stating he attended the summit only because Erdogan was the host.

Viewed from Washington, the administration frames the shift as a step to repair ties with a NATO ally on the alliance’s southeastern flank. Turkish officials, for their part, regard the pledge as a diplomatic breakthrough that could restore access to advanced US technology and bolster Erdogan’s domestic standing amid a crackdown on the political opposition. In Jerusalem, however, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has mounted a public campaign against the sale, warning it would “destroy the balance of power in the Middle East” and describing Turkey as a regime influenced by the Muslim Brotherhood that threatens the Jewish state. Israeli defence planners, according to analysts cited in regional media, view the F-35 as a cornerstone of their qualitative military edge, and fear that Turkish acquisition would erode Israel’s air superiority and freedom of action.

Beyond the immediate triangle, the potential transfer carries wider regional implications. Turkish defence analysts note that Ankara has already demonstrated power-projection capabilities through its drone deployments in Libya, where Bayraktar TB2s and electronic warfare systems turned the tide of battle in 2019–2020 and established a permanent military footprint. An F-35 acquisition would not create a new capability from scratch but would validate and extend an existing one, potentially altering balances in the Eastern Mediterranean, Syria, and the Black Sea. In New Delhi, strategic observers point to Turkey’s deepening defence cooperation with Pakistan as a factor that could indirectly affect India’s security calculus.

The legal path to a sale, however, remains blocked by US legislation. Congress banned F-35 transfers to Turkey unless it divests the S-400 systems, and lawmakers from both parties have signalled they will oppose any executive waiver. Congressional sources indicate that a joint resolution of disapproval could be introduced, while Moscow’s end-user obligations on the S-400 deal further complicate any removal. The dossier now moves to a legislative test in Washington, where the administration’s ability to deliver on Trump’s pledge will be measured against entrenched congressional scepticism and Israel’s lobbying efforts.

Divergence — who tells it how
25%Medium
4 blocs · positions from −0.80 to −0.20
CriticalFavorable
ISRATLINDALM
Divergence between press blocs
Israeli press−0.80critical
Atlantic / Anglosphere press−0.20neutral
Indian & South Asian press−0.30critical
Arab Levant-Maghreb press−0.20neutral
Turkish press outlets are not present in this cluster.
Israeli press−0.80
Voice

Israel firmly rejects the sale of F-35s to Turkey, viewing it as an existential threat to its national security. Netanyahu personally opposes it, citing the Islamist nature of the Turkish regime.

Mechanismgerarchia di minacce

The bloc builds credibility by evoking Israel's technological and military superiority as a pillar of regional order, and presenting Turkey as a hostile and ideologically incompatible actor.

Omission

Omits the context of Turkey's NATO membership and the US desire to mend ties with a key ally, as well as the fact that Turkey was previously part of the F-35 program before sanctions.

AlarmOutrage
Atlantic / Anglosphere press−0.20
Voice

The Atlantic West cautiously observes the rapprochement between Trump and Erdogan. On one hand, it recognizes the strategic value of keeping Turkey in NATO; on the other, it warns against yielding to an ally that purchased Russian systems.

Mechanismcontrapposizione istituzionale

The bloc legitimizes its position by balancing geopolitical realism (the need to mend ties with Turkey) with the defense of institutional norms (sanctions, congressional opposition), creating a narrative of tension between executive and legislature.

Omission

Omits the Israeli perspective of existential threat and the reaction of Arab states, focusing solely on US domestic dynamics and NATO cohesion.

SkepticismPragmatismSplit voices
Indian & South Asian press−0.30
Voice

India watches with concern the sale of F-35s to Turkey, as it could strengthen Pakistan, a historical rival. The analysis focuses on implications for the regional power balance.

Mechanismcontagio strategico

The bloc builds credibility by linking the F-35 sale to Turkey with the indirect threat posed by Pakistan, using an argument of chain of alliances and technology transfer.

Omission

Omits the Israeli perspective of direct threat and Turkey's role in NATO, focusing solely on the Turkey-Pakistan axis and its implications for India.

PragmatismSkepticism
Arab Levant-Maghreb press−0.20
Voice

The Arab world sees the Israeli position as an attempt to maintain air hegemony, while Turkey has the right to strengthen its defensive capabilities.

Mechanismegemonismo

The bloc makes its criticism plausible by describing Israeli opposition as driven by selfish interests, not real security concerns, using language that dismantles Israeli claims of superiority.

Omission

Omits the context of Turkey's violation of sanctions (S-400 purchase) and Israel's genuine security concerns, presenting Israeli opposition as mere selfishness.

SkepticismOutrage

This story appeared in

8 outlets · 4 languages

Broaden your view

From Economy & Markets

VW Board Confronts Plan to Shutter Four German Plants and Shed 100,000 Jobs

8 languages · 18 outlets

From Technology

US export controls on AI models trigger open-source pivot as OpenAI readies GPT-5.6

6 languages · 8 outlets

From Science & Health

Carney’s Saudi Visit and Iran Overture Signal Canada’s Trade-First Pivot

2 languages · 5 outlets

Read more