
New research complicates the picture on sugar, sleep and metabolic health
A wave of studies suggests that eliminating sugar entirely, using artificial sweeteners, or sleeping too little or too much can backfire, challenging conventional health advice.
A meta-analysis of 21 randomised clinical trials, conducted by researchers at Tufts University in the United States, has found that consuming non-sugar sweeteners is associated with elevated fasting insulin and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) compared with water or placebo. Separately, a rodent study with six mice per group showed that a strict zero-sugar diet, while not causing weight gain, triggered a collapse in glucose clearance and hormonal signals of gut distress. These findings arrive as a large British cohort study, drawing on hundreds of thousands of UK Biobank participants, reports a U-shaped relationship between sleep duration and biological ageing: organs aged slowest when nightly rest fell between roughly six-and-a-half and eight hours, while both shorter and longer sleep were linked to accelerated ageing markers, particularly in the brain.
The mechanisms under scrutiny centre on the gut microbiome and hormonal regulation. The Tufts team points to evidence that some sweeteners alter the composition and function of intestinal bacteria, potentially impairing insulin sensitivity. In the zero-sugar mouse model, the absence of simple dietary sugars starved beneficial microbes that produce short-chain fatty acids essential for maintaining the gut barrier; the resulting “leaky gut” allowed bacterial toxins to enter circulation and provoke an immune response. On the sleep side, a separate experimental study with young trained adults demonstrated that a single night of four hours’ rest or total sleep deprivation reduced muscle force output by 10–15 per cent in men and endurance by 7–12 per cent in women. Although fat oxidation increased after sleeplessness, researchers described this as a stress adaptation rather than a metabolic improvement, noting concurrent rises in cortisol, heart rate and perceived exertion.
Viewed from Southeast Asia, health authorities reinforce the broader context. Indonesian medical sources highlight that even modest portions of high-sugar, high-fat foods and sugary drinks can conceal calorie loads that disrupt hormonal balance, with one gynaecological oncologist warning that excess adiposity-driven oestrogen may raise endometrial cancer risk. The World Health Organization estimates that unsafe food causes 600 million illnesses and 420,000 deaths annually, underscoring that food safety—proper storage, avoiding contamination—is as consequential as nutritional composition. Meanwhile, a meta-analysis from Canadian and Brazilian researchers associates sleeping more than eight hours with a 28 per cent higher dementia risk, though they caution that extended sleep may be an early marker of underlying disease rather than a cause.
The evidence remains at an early stage. The sweetener meta-analysis authors stress that data are insufficient to condemn all sugar substitutes, and the zero-sugar findings are confined to a small animal study using a low-fat diet, far removed from typical high-fat Western patterns. The next factual milestone will be the release of results from ongoing long-term human intervention trials examining sweeteners, gut health and metabolic endpoints, which could inform future updates to dietary guidelines by bodies such as the WHO. For now, the converging signal from multiple study designs and regions is that extreme dietary exclusions and sleep patterns carry underappreciated metabolic costs.
How the same story is told elsewhere.
2 editorial groups · 4 languages
An American study reveals that artificial sweeteners raise fasting insulin and glycated hemoglobin, endangering metabolism. The analysis of 21 clinical trials debunks the myth of sugar-free diets as a healthy choice. Sugar substitutes, far from harmless, conceal unexpected dangers for the gut and metabolism.
A new study suggests that cutting out all sugar might worsen metabolic health, but experts urge caution: the research was conducted on just six mice per group. Rodents have a digestive system very different from humans, so the findings are far from definitive. Before overhauling your diet, it's best to wait for human studies.
Broaden your view
Trump Debuts Qatar-Gifted Air Force One Amid Bipartisan Ethics Scrutiny
10 languages · 26 outlets
From Economy & MarketsOpenAI floats 5% equity transfer to US government as AI scrutiny intensifies
7 languages · 15 outlets
From TechnologyIndia freezes WhatsApp username rollout, extends scrutiny to Telegram and Signal
4 languages · 10 outlets