
Eisenkot's Yashar Surges Past Likud in Israeli Polls as Election Nears
Former army chief Gadi Eisenkot leads Netanyahu in suitability and his new centrist party tops seat projections, threatening the prime minister's hold on power ahead of the 27 October vote.
With less than four months before Israel's 27 October general election, the new centrist party Yashar, led by former military chief of staff Gadi Eisenkot, has overtaken Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Likud in multiple opinion polls. Surveys published by Channel 12 show Yashar winning 23–24 Knesset seats against Likud's 22, while Eisenkot holds a 43-to-34 percent advantage over Netanyahu when voters are asked who is most suitable to lead the country. Neither the Netanyahu-aligned bloc of right-wing, ultra-Orthodox and settler parties nor the opposition camp under Eisenkot currently commands the 61 seats required to form a government, leaving the two Arab-majority parties, each projected to win five seats, as potential kingmakers.
A former communications adviser to Netanyahu, Avi Bushinsky, told Israeli radio that the prime minister's overriding objective is to prevent the opposition from reaching a majority, aiming instead for a political tie that would force fresh elections while he remains at the head of a transitional government. According to Bushinsky, such a deadlock would allow Netanyahu to govern without a sitting Knesset to constrain him and would shield him from the corruption trial that, Israeli analysts note, could be imperilled by a change of power. Netanyahu has in recent days made concessions to coalition partners, a move described in Swedish press commentary as a sign of panic.
Eisenkot's challenge draws much of its force from his biography. The son of Moroccan immigrants, he is positioned to become Israel's first prime minister of Mizrahi origin, directly contesting a voter base that has underpinned Likud's electoral dominance since the 1970s. His son Gal and a nephew were killed fighting in Gaza, a sacrifice that Israeli media contrast with the fact that Netanyahu's adult sons have not been called up. An attempt by Netanyahu's inner circle to mock Eisenkot's accented English backfired, according to analysts in Israel, because it revived perceptions of Ashkenazi condescension toward Jews of North African descent and risked alienating the very voters Likud needs to retain.
On policy, Eisenkot has criticised Netanyahu for what he describes as overly rapid concessions to US demands for a Lebanon ceasefire, while himself describing calls for a Palestinian state as "out of context." He is viewed in Israeli commentary as a centrist open to a coalition with left-wing parties and supportive of drafting both Arab citizens and ultra-Orthodox Jews. The election, the first since the Hamas attack of 7 October 2023, is scheduled to be held by late October, though no precise date has been set. The campaign is expected to intensify around the enlistment question and the legacy of the security collapse, with the final outcome likely to hinge on whether Eisenkot can convert his polling lead into a parliamentary majority or whether Netanyahu succeeds in engineering the stalemate his former adviser described.
| Arab Levant-Maghreb press | 0.00 | neutral |
|---|---|---|
| Israeli press | −0.40 | critical |
| Iranian & allied press | −0.30 | critical |
| Continental European press | −0.40 | critical |
Eisenkot, son of Moroccan immigrants, poses a direct challenge to Netanyahu's electoral base.
The rhetorical technique is ethnic personalization: emphasizing Eisenkot's Mizrahi identity to explain his rise, making it plausible that he can attract voters traditionally loyal to Likud.
It omits Netanyahu's maneuvers to secure his family's security and his stalemate strategy, present in the Israeli press.
Netanyahu clings to power with desperate maneuvers, while Eisenkot emerges as a credible threat.
Strategic fragmentation: by covering multiple aspects (personal security, electoral strategy, political criticism), the press creates a composite portrait of a leader in trouble.
It does not delve into the role of Mizrahi voters and Eisenkot's Moroccan identity, which are central in the Arab press.
The Zionist regime is in crisis: polls show Netanyahu's imminent defeat.
Systemic delegitimization: using the term 'regime' and focusing on Netanyahu's defeat serves to undermine the legitimacy of the Israeli state.
It omits internal Israeli divisions and Eisenkot's background, which could humanize the competition.
Netanyahu is a weakened leader, grappling with the consequences of October 7 and an uphill election campaign.
Critical historicization: by placing the election in the context of the October 7 security failure, it suggests Netanyahu is responsible and his decline is deserved.
It does not mention the role of Mizrahi voters or the Iranian perspective, focusing solely on Netanyahu and the historical context.
Broaden your view
Oil surges past $85 as US reinstates Hormuz blockade and imposes transit toll
6 languages · 22 outlets
From TechnologyIndian-Origin NASA Astronaut Lifts Off on Russian Soyuz for Eight-Month ISS Mission
4 languages · 9 outlets
From Science & HealthFirst true sugar detected in interstellar space, as deep-time studies reshape origins debate
4 languages · 6 outlets