
French National Assembly adopts assisted dying law, triggering constitutional review
The bill, passed after years of debate and three Senate rejections, permits terminally ill adults to request lethal medication under strict conditions, but faces a final legal hurdle before enactment.
The French National Assembly voted 291 to 241 on Wednesday to adopt legislation creating a legal right to assisted dying for adults with incurable illnesses, completing a parliamentary process that had been blocked three times by the conservative-dominated Senate. Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu immediately announced he would refer parts of the text to the Constitutional Council, a review that could delay the law’s entry into force by up to a month and may require amendments. The vote fulfils a 2022 campaign promise by President Emmanuel Macron, who described the outcome as the result of “listening, dialogue and debate” and a step taken “with seriousness, humility and full respect for our democracy.”
Under the approved text, access is restricted to patients aged at least 18 who are French citizens or legal residents, suffer from a serious and incurable life-threatening illness in an advanced or terminal phase, and experience constant physical or psychological suffering that is either resistant to treatment or unbearable. Psychological suffering alone does not qualify, and people with severe psychiatric disorders or neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer’s are explicitly excluded. The patient must be able to express a free and informed choice, and after a doctor’s approval—which must be given within 15 days following a collegial assessment—a minimum two-day reflection period is required before the lethal substance is administered. The default is self-administration; a doctor or nurse may intervene only if the patient is physically incapable. The legislation includes a conscience clause for healthcare professionals and obliges the national health insurance system to cover all associated costs.
The bill’s passage exposed deep political and societal divisions. The Senate, where the right-wing Les Républicains hold a majority, rejected the text on three occasions, arguing it risked pressuring the elderly and disabled and undermined the principle of protecting life. In the National Assembly, centrist and left-wing groups largely supported the measure, while the far-right Rassemblement National and most conservative deputies voted against. The Catholic Church in France campaigned vigorously against the law, with one bishop threatening to deny communion to lawmakers who backed it. Medical bodies and disability rights organisations also voiced opposition, warning of a slippery slope and inadequate safeguards for vulnerable individuals. Polls, however, consistently show that a clear majority of the French public supports legalising assisted dying.
The Constitutional Council will now examine three specific provisions: the two-day reflection period, which opponents consider too short; the capacity of adults under legal protection to give free and informed consent; and the obligation of healthcare facilities to provide assisted dying services even when their primary mission is palliative care. The Council’s ruling is binding and could strike down parts of the law or demand revisions. Once the constitutional review is complete, the president can promulgate the text, after which government decrees will define practical details such as the substances to be used and the operation of oversight mechanisms. France will then join a small group of European nations—including the Netherlands, Belgium, Spain and Switzerland—that have legalised some form of assisted dying, though each operates under a distinct regulatory model. The French approach, deliberately avoiding the terms “euthanasia” and “assisted suicide” in the legislative text, reflects an effort to forge a national compromise on an issue that continues to generate intense ethical debate across the continent.
| Latin American press | +0.10 | neutral |
|---|---|---|
| Continental European press | −0.60 | critical |
| Sub-Saharan African press | 0.00 | neutral |
The Colombian psychologist fought for her right to a dignified death, and her case exposes the lack of regulation.
By focusing on the personal narrative and the judicial process, the debate is humanized and pressure is applied for legal change.
The European debate on euthanasia for mental suffering and the suicide case in the UK are not discussed.
The French end-of-life law is a license to kill disguised as balance.
By using alarmist reader comments, an impression of popular rejection is created and the Colombian case is projected as a warning for France.
The specific case of Catalina Giraldo and her legal battle are omitted, avoiding a direct confrontation with a request for euthanasia for mental suffering.
The death of a Nigerian woman in the UK highlights the tragic consequences of untreated mental health issues.
By reporting a coroner's inquest factually, the story is presented as a public health issue rather than a legal or moral one.
The legal possibility of euthanasia and the Colombian debate are not mentioned, presenting suicide as the only outcome.
Broaden your view
Trump Accuses China of 'Largest' US Election Data Breach, Reviving 2020 Fraud Claims
13 languages · 69 outlets
From Economy & MarketsUS confirms 25% tariff on Brazilian imports, exempting key commodities, as political blame game intensifies
2 languages · 14 outlets
From TechnologySpaceX Starship abort at ignition halts first post-IPO test flight
8 languages · 26 outlets