
Balogun says Trump’s FIFA call unsettled US squad before Belgium rout
Folarin Balogun admitted the political furore over his rescinded red card created nerves and outside noise that proved impossible to ignore as the co-hosts crashed out 4-1.
The United States’ World Cup ended in a 4-1 dismantling by Belgium in the round of 16, a match that will be remembered less for the scoreline than for the extraordinary chain of events that placed striker Folarin Balogun on the pitch. His presence, made possible by a presidential phone call and a last‑minute FIFA reprieve, became the story that overshadowed the host nation’s exit.
Balogun had been sent off in the previous round, a 2-0 win over Bosnia‑Herzegovina, after VAR review showed him treading on defender Tarik Muharemovic’s leg. The automatic one‑match suspension was abruptly commuted by FIFA’s disciplinary committee to a conditional ban with a year’s probation, clearing him to face Belgium. President Donald Trump then confirmed he had telephoned FIFA president Gianni Infantino to request a review, a disclosure that drew sharp criticism from the Belgian football federation and UEFA, which called the process unprecedented and unjustifiable.
Speaking to CBS days after the defeat, Balogun described the emotional whiplash inside the camp. “My initial reaction was I was happy to be back in the team, but when I started to reflect, I knew it was going to cause a lot of controversy,” he said. He noted visible nervousness among team‑mates and a surge of external noise that made concentration difficult. The squad learned of the decision on the team bus en route to training, a moment of celebration that quickly gave way to the realisation they were now at the centre of a global governance row.
Viewed from European capitals, the episode raised fundamental questions about the independence of football’s disciplinary processes. In Washington, the intervention was framed by Trump as a matter of fairness, insisting he had merely asked for a review of what he considered an unintentional collision. Within the US dressing room, however, the effect was more immediate: a player who had been preparing in a support role was suddenly thrust back into the starting eleven, and the team’s focus was fractured by a controversy that had nothing to do with tactics.
Balogun started against Belgium but made little impact, and the co‑hosts were eliminated with a performance that looked drained of the cohesion they had shown earlier in the tournament. Belgium advanced to a quarter‑final against Spain, while the Americans were left to reckon with a campaign in which a disciplinary saga, rather than any on‑field achievement, became the defining narrative.
| Latin American press | −0.70 | critical |
|---|---|---|
| Continental European press | −0.50 | critical |
Trump personally interfered, Balogun suffers the consequences, the team was destabilized.
The direct call from Trump to Infantino is highlighted as proof of power abuse, turning a sporting decision into a political act.
Does not explore the institutional context of FIFA's procedures, focusing instead on the emotional impact on the team.
FIFA falls into a scandal, Balogun acknowledges the burden on the team.
The story is presented as a breach of sporting procedures, questioning FIFA's integrity by highlighting the unusual intervention.
Does not mention that Trump publicly admitted to calling Infantino, softening the direct responsibility.
Broaden your view
New York Mayor Reviews Legal Basis to Arrest Netanyahu During UN Visit
11 languages · 42 outlets
From Economy & MarketsUS confirms 25% tariff on Brazilian imports, exempting key commodities, as political blame game intensifies
2 languages · 14 outlets
From TechnologyIndia’s private sector reaches orbit on first attempt with Vikram-1 rocket
6 languages · 11 outlets