
特朗普召集国安团队商讨对伊朗境内战略目标发动大规模打击
美方计划将军事行动从霍尔木兹海峡扩展至伊朗纵深,以迫使德黑兰开放航道并接受核要求,伊朗则持续反击美军基地并威胁提高铀浓缩水平。
美国总统特朗普于周二在战情室召集国家安全核心官员,讨论对伊朗发动“大规模”军事打击的新方案。据Axios援引三名知情人士报道,会议聚焦于将行动范围从当前霍尔木兹海峡周边的空袭,扩大至伊朗境内的战略目标,包括实施“毁灭性打击”的计划。与会者包括副总统万斯、国务卿鲁比奥、国防部长赫格塞思、参谋长联席会议主席凯恩、中央情报局局长拉特克利夫及总统特使威特科夫等。白宫未对该会议置评。
美方当前的军事行动已进入第四天,主要打击伊朗在霍尔木兹海峡附近的防空雷达、反舰导弹阵地和无人机发射场。美国中央司令部司令库珀称,伊朗在过去一周蓄意攻击七艘商船,造成平民船员伤亡,美军则协调了约三百艘船只通过海峡。与此同时,美国对伊朗港口的封锁于周二下午启动。特朗普在会前接受福克斯新闻采访时威胁,若伊朗不回到谈判桌,将在下周打击其发电厂和桥梁,并称“最好达成协议,否则什么都不会剩下”。美方官员将这一系列行动的目标表述为:显著削弱伊朗封锁海峡的能力,并迫使其接受美国关于核计划的要求。
伊朗方面持续以导弹和无人机攻击美国在约旦、科威特和巴林的基地作为回应。伊朗官方和革命卫队此前警告,若战事重燃,可能将铀浓缩丰度提升至90%,并对整个地区发动“毁灭性打击”。此外,英国于周一依据新授权将伊朗革命卫队列为安全威胁实体,指其利用代理人从事监视与破坏活动,德黑兰对此予以谴责。这一外交动作进一步压缩了伊朗的国际空间。
霍尔木兹海峡是全球约五分之一石油运输的咽喉,局势升级直接牵动亚洲能源安全。中国作为主要石油进口国,其能源供应链面临潜在中断风险,国际油价波动亦可能冲击区域经济复苏。亚洲政策分析界普遍认为,中方将加大外交斡旋力度,呼吁各方保持克制,避免冲突外溢破坏“一带一路”沿线稳定。若美方将打击延伸至伊朗境内基础设施乃至深埋地下的核设施,不仅可能引发更大规模地区战争,也将使伊核问题彻底脱离外交轨道,加剧核扩散风险。
目前,美方宣称军事行动将持续至“目标达成”,特朗普已向伊朗发出最后通牒,但部分美国官员对谈判前景持怀疑态度。伊朗在反击的同时,尚未正式拒绝接触。局势仍高度紧张,下一步焦点在于美方是否将威胁付诸实施,以及伊朗是否会以加速核活动或升级地区代理人攻势作为回应。
| 俄罗斯及独联体媒体 | −0.40 | critical |
|---|---|---|
| 伊朗及相关媒体 | −0.80 | critical |
| 阿拉伯黎凡特—马格里布媒体 | −0.50 | critical |
| 大西洋/英语圈媒体 | +0.20 | neutral |
The Trump administration is planning a broader attack on Iran, a move that Russia considers unjustified and destabilizing aggression.
The Russian bloc presents the US initiative as an act of unilateral aggression, using a detached tone to suggest that the US is violating international law.
The Russian bloc omits reference to Iranian nuclear sites, focusing only on generic strategic targets, which reduces the specificity of the threat.
Iran is under threat of a devastating attack by the United States, which aims to destroy the country's strategic and nuclear infrastructure.
The Iranian bloc emphasizes Iran's vulnerability and American brutality, using emotional language to mobilize domestic and international solidarity.
The Iranian bloc omits the specific name of the nuclear site 'Mountain of Axe', avoiding detailing the most sensitive target.
The Arab region is on the brink of catastrophe, with the United States ready to bomb Iranian nuclear sites, endangering the stability of the entire Middle East.
The Arab bloc amplifies the imminent threat and potential catastrophic consequences, using rhetorical questions to create a sense of urgency and alarm.
The Arab bloc does not omit significant elements compared to other blocs; it includes both the nuclear threat and the American strategic goal.
The United States is taking decisive measures to protect its interests and force Iran to comply with nuclear demands, a necessary strategy for global security.
The Atlanticist bloc presents the escalation as a rational and necessary choice, using analytical language to justify US actions as a response to Iranian provocations.
The Atlanticist bloc omits humanitarian consequences and potential violations of international law, presenting the action as purely strategic.