德黑兰东部爆炸声：官方称系弹药销毁，革命卫队指与“美以侵略”遗留有关
伊朗不同机构对爆炸原因给出差异化解说，事件发生在美伊军事摩擦与外交谈判并行的敏感时刻。
伊朗首都德黑兰东部帕克达什特县及周边地区周六上午传出爆炸声，引发外界关注。当地官方迅速回应，帕克达什特县长穆罕默德·库米通过伊朗媒体表示，爆炸声源于一次“按预定计划进行的陈旧弹药销毁行动”，全程遵守安全规程，未发生任何事故或安全威胁，并呼吁民众仅关注官方消息。
然而，伊朗革命卫队“赛义德·舒哈达”省指挥部随后发布的声明提供了不同归因。声明称，爆炸声来自专业排爆小组对“美国—犹太复国主义政权侵略遗留的未爆弹药”进行的技术性、受控销毁作业，并提醒作业将持续至当天下午3时，期间可能仍有爆炸声。这一表述将事件与伊朗长期以来的反美、反以叙事直接挂钩，与地方行政官员侧重技术操作、淡化政治色彩的说法形成对比。
此次爆炸声出现的时机正值美伊关系高度紧张且外交接触持续的节点。据地区媒体报道，此前数日，美伊之间曾发生“激烈的交火”，美国总统特朗普关于停火“已经结束”的表态一度引发对双方既有谅解备忘录存续性的质疑。但随后有美国官员通过媒体释放信号，称美方仍致力于与伊朗寻求持久和平解决方案，相关谈判仍在进行。在此背景下，伊朗官方不同系统对同一事件的不同定性，被地区观察人士视为内部协调与对外信号传递的复杂体现。
对于亚洲及中国而言，伊朗的稳定直接关系到中东能源通道安全与“一带一路”沿线项目的推进环境。此次事件虽未造成实质损失，但革命卫队将弹药销毁与“美以侵略”挂钩的表述，再次凸显伊朗安全机构在敏感时期主动塑造叙事、强化外部威胁认知的倾向。截至发稿，伊朗官方强调各地秩序正常，未报告任何安全事件，但地区安全圈内对美伊外交轨道能否管控军事摩擦风险仍保持审慎关注。
| 伊朗及相关媒体 | +0.20 | neutral |
|---|---|---|
| 俄罗斯及独联体媒体 | 0.00 | neutral |
| 阿拉伯海湾媒体 | 0.00 | neutral |
The Iranian regime reassures the public by attributing the explosions to a disposal operation and pointing to remnants of an external aggression.
The regime uses a double move: on one hand it normalizes the event as technical routine, on the other it frames it as a consequence of enemy aggression, strengthening internal cohesion against an external threat.
Iranian outlets omit any reference to the context of tension with the United States and to Trump's statements, which are present in other blocs. They also do not mention the possibility that the operation could be linked to military preparations.
Russia re-projects the local event into the framework of the US-Iran confrontation, highlighting Trump's belligerent statements as background.
The article juxtaposes the disposal operation with Trump's threats without explicit comment, but the juxtaposition creates an impression of causality or imminent escalation.
Russian press omits the official Iranian statements attributing the explosions to war remnants, and does not report the Sepah version that speaks of 'American-Zionist aggression'. It also does not mention the reassurance that the operation was planned.
Gulf media frame the event as a symptom of US-Iran tension, casting doubt on the official version and highlighting the risk of conflict.
They use the technique of 'strategic doubt': they report the official explanation but flank it with contextual elements that undermine it, such as recent clashes and Trump's statements, leaving the reader with the impression that the truth is different.
Gulf media omit the detailed version of the Sepah that speaks of 'remnants of aggression' and the reassurance that the operation was planned. They also do not report the governor's statements ruling out security threats.