
Washington’s direct oversight of Caracas finances and policy sets template for Cuba pressure
A new investigation details how Secretary of State Marco Rubio controls Venezuelan oil revenues and government decisions, while Havana wrestles with US reform demands and internal dynastic tensions.
A New York Times investigation published on Saturday reveals the extent to which US Secretary of State Marco Rubio exercises de facto governance over Venezuela from Washington, controlling oil revenues, cabinet appointments and even social media posts. Since the US commando raid that captured President Nicolás Maduro in January, Rubio has maintained daily contact with interim leader Delcy Rodríguez, establishing what one US official reportedly called a ‘viceroy’-like authority. The arrangement funnels nearly all Venezuelan export earnings through the US Treasury, with Rubio’s team dictating how funds are released and which foreign companies may operate under sanctions exemptions.
The report details a financial architecture in which two trading firms, Trafigura and Vitol, handle most Venezuelan oil sales under an agreement structured by the Trump administration. Rubio personally decides the conditions for disbursing these revenues, effectively controlling the government’s payroll and budget. His influence extends to security matters: US officials used Venezuelan intelligence to target a leader of the Tren de Aragua criminal group, and Caracas extradited Maduro associate Alex Saab at Washington’s behest. Foreign policy messaging is also micromanaged—Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yván Gil deleted a social media post mildly critical of a US strike on Iran after the White House objected. Rodríguez herself shares draft tweets with Rubio’s office before publication.
Viewed from Havana, this model of economic coercion and elite co-optation is now being tested on Cuba. Secretary Rubio, a Cuban-American hardliner, demanded last week that the island’s government accept Washington’s reform agenda “before it is too late,” citing the 2021 protests. Simultaneously, an unusual public admission by Raúl Castro’s grandson, Raúl Guillermo Rodríguez Castro, has exposed an apparent backchannel: in an interview with USA Today, he declared his readiness to negotiate directly with Donald Trump, insisting his luxury lifestyle is funded by private friends, not state assets. The remarks provoked sharp rebukes from state television journalist Michel Torres and singer Israel Rojas, both loyalists who decried the bypassing of Cuba’s institutions, while Prime Minister Manuel Marrero confirmed the grandson’s role as part of a team with Raúl Castro’s mandate.
The Trump administration appears to be replicating its Venezuela playbook—installing or empowering a politically indispensable local figure who can deliver resource access and economic reforms while insulating Washington from direct governance costs. In Caracas, Rodríguez faces growing domestic demands for elections, which she can only vaguely promise “sometime.” US critics charge that the arrangement props up an unelected and deeply unpopular administration while diverting Venezuelan resources. In Cuba, the regime confronts an intensifying energy crisis that President Díaz-Canel blames on a “genocidal oil blockade,” even as Washington imposes new visa bans on senior military and interior officials. The dual approach—suffocating sanctions paired with selective engagement of dynastic insiders—now defines the administration’s Caribbean strategy, with no clear electoral exits in sight.
| Israeli press | −0.60 | critical |
|---|---|---|
| Latin American press | −0.90 | critical |
| Arab Levant-Maghreb press | −0.40 | critical |
Critical Israeli press exposes American hypocrisy: a Secretary of State acting as viceroy, while America preaches democracy.
It amplifies the gap between official discourse and reality, using Trump's joke as evidence that Venezuela's subjugation was planned.
It omits the link to Cuba and the strategic dimension of this control as a template for further pressure.
Latin America denounces the new form of colonialism: Rubio controls every aspect of Venezuelan life, humiliating national sovereignty.
It personifies interference in a single individual (Rubio) and portrays him as a viceroy, evoking historical memories of colonialism to mobilize indignation.
It omits the context of Trump's joke and the possibility that some Venezuelans support the intervention.
The Arab world acknowledges American control over Venezuela, without emotional emphasis but with implicit criticism of imperialism.
It presents facts as routine power politics, but the choice to reproduce the NYT report without additions signals critical distance.
It does not mention Cuba or historical dimensions of control, limiting itself to the immediate financial aspect.
Broaden your view
Apple briefly reclaims world’s most valuable company title as AI sentiment pivots
9 languages · 27 outlets
From TechnologyAI skills command premium pay while young graduates and existing staff lose ground
5 languages · 6 outlets
From Science & HealthMexican Lettuce Pulled as Cyclospora Outbreak Traced to Taco Bell Supplier
5 languages · 29 outlets