
Volleyball lifts Russia ban, restoring path to 2028 Olympics
The International Volleyball Federation has reinstated Russian national teams and their world ranking points, making it the first major Olympic sport to fully readmit the country after the IOC’s suspension was lifted.
The International Volleyball Federation (FIVB) has cleared Russian athletes and national teams to return to all its competitions, ending a suspension that had been in place since March 2022. The decision, announced on 8 July, restores Russia’s men’s and women’s teams to the world rankings with the points they held at the moment of their freeze — third place for the men, ninth for the women — and permits them to compete in world championships and official events. The display of the Russian flag, anthem and other national symbols will be determined later by FIVB and the European Volleyball Confederation (CEV) in consultation with international sports bodies.
The move follows the International Olympic Committee’s executive board decision a day earlier to provisionally lift the suspension of the Russian Olympic Committee, in force since October 2023, and to withdraw its earlier recommendations that had urged federations to exclude Russian athletes or admit them only as neutrals. The IOC based its reversal on a legal analysis showing that the Russian committee no longer includes regional sports organisations from the occupied Ukrainian territories of Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, and has confirmed it will not conduct activities there. IOC President Kirsty Coventry said the committee did not want to hold athletes responsible for their governments’ actions. Returning Russian competitors must satisfy anti-doping requirements, including multiple pre-return tests overseen by the International Testing Agency, given that Russia’s national anti-doping agency remains non-compliant with the World Anti-Doping Code.
In European football, the landscape is markedly different. UEFA and several of its most influential member associations — including those of England, Germany and France — remain opposed to readmitting Russian clubs and national teams, according to officials cited in British media. The Guardian reported that there is “no real prospect” of Russia returning to European football, partly because UEFA controls the qualifying pathway for World Cups and its president, Aleksander Čeferin, faces re-election in 2027 and is unlikely to defy key voters. FIFA has indicated it will review its position but has not signalled a change. In Ukraine, the IOC’s broader decision drew sharp condemnation. The foreign ministry called it “a worrying signal for the entire international community”, while Ukrainian skeleton athlete Vladyslav Heraskevych described it as “absolutely shameful” and accused the IOC of hypocrisy, pointing to the daily civilian toll of the war.
For Russian volleyball, the practical effect is immediate: the national teams are now eligible for the qualification pathway to the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics. The men’s and women’s sides missed the Paris 2024 Games during the ban. Olympic berths will be decided via a combination of continental championships, the 2027 World Championship and world ranking, all of which are now open to Russia. The next concrete step will be a decision by the CEV administrative council on whether to readmit Russian clubs to European competitions, a matter on which no date has yet been set.
| Russian & CIS press | +0.90 | aligned |
|---|---|---|
| Latin American press | −0.40 | critical |
| Southeast Asian press | 0.00 | neutral |
| Continental European press | −0.50 | critical |
Russia celebrates the return as a victory for common sense and the fundamental right to sport, thanking FIVB for following IOC recommendations.
Russia universalizes the decision as an application of universal principles (right to sport) and minimizes the political context, presenting the return as a normal technical procedure.
Ukrainian criticisms and European security concerns are not mentioned.
Ukraine condemns the decision as a concession to the aggressor Russia, while Brazil records the fact without judgment.
Ukrainian criticism personifies the Russian state as an aggressor and presents the decision as a security threat, while Brazil adopts a detached, technical tone.
The Russian perspective on the legitimacy of the return and the principle of the right to sport are not represented.
Indonesia reports the decision as a technical fact, citing official statements without adding interpretations.
It adopts a pure news approach, avoiding any judgment and merely recording facts and official statements.
Critical reactions from Ukraine or European countries, as well as Russian celebration, are not mentioned.
Germany denounces the decision as a victory for the Kremlin and a danger to sport, while a Russian-language report presents it as a routine update.
German criticism uses a hierarchy of threats, linking the decision to a strengthening of the Russian regime and a risk to European security, while the Russian-language report adopts a technical, neutral tone.
Russian celebration and the perspective of the right to sport are not included.
Broaden your view
Trump Declares Iran Ceasefire Over, Yet Agrees to Continue Talks
6 languages · 39 outlets
From Economy & MarketsSK Hynix’s $26.5bn US listing sets record as AI chip demand defies geopolitical jitters
6 languages · 12 outlets
From TechnologyChina recovers orbital rocket booster at sea in first, narrowing reusable launcher gap
7 languages · 14 outlets