Sign in
Edition of 10:00 CETTuesday, July 21, 2026
311 outlets · 17 languages414 briefings today
Defense & SecurityFriday, July 17, 2026

US to send dozens more refuelling planes to Israel as Trump weighs wider Iran strikes

The deployment, requested by Washington, would restore the fleet to early-war levels and enable expanded operations against Iranian infrastructure and nuclear sites, according to officials.

The United States has informed Israel that it will deploy dozens of additional aerial refuelling aircraft in the coming days, a move that US and Israeli officials say is preparation for a possible expansion of military operations against Iran. The notification, reported by Axios and confirmed by multiple regional and international outlets, comes as President Donald Trump reviews new military options presented during a White House Situation Room meeting on Tuesday. According to those officials, the plans under consideration go beyond the current campaign focused on the Strait of Hormuz and include strikes on Iranian power plants, further attacks on nuclear facilities to bury enriched uranium deeper underground, and a possible bombardment of the Pickaxe Mountain site, a suspected nuclear facility under construction.

Viewed from Washington, the additional refuelling aircraft — which would bring the total deployed in Israel to roughly the level seen at the start of the conflict — are intended to sustain longer-range air operations. US forces currently operate around 30 tankers from Ben Gurion International Airport near Tel Aviv and a similar number from Ramon Airport in the south. Israeli officials told Axios that the US military prefers Ben Gurion because other regional bases are considered more exposed to Iranian missile and drone attacks. The Trump administration has formally asked the Israeli government to accommodate the extra planes, with the final decision resting with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The US has not yet taken a final decision on escalation, but officials cited in the reports say Trump appears ready to inflict what one described as “sufficient damage” to compel Tehran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and accept American demands on its nuclear programme.

Inside Israel, the deployment has triggered a political dispute. The concentration of US tankers at Ben Gurion has already caused severe congestion, and the transport ministry, led by Miri Regev, has warned that without relocating some aircraft, thousands of civilian flights and tens of thousands of passenger tickets could be cancelled at the peak of the summer travel season. Regev, a close ally of Netanyahu, has demanded the planes be moved or their number capped at 20. The Israel Defense Forces and the defence ministry oppose the demand, arguing that alternative airfields in the Negev desert do not meet US operational requirements. With Israeli elections three months away, the potential disruption to civilian air traffic is seen by analysts in Israel as a political liability for the ruling coalition.

Meanwhile, the military tempo on both sides has intensified. US forces struck at least seven bridges around the port city of Bandar Abbas on Thursday, the fifth consecutive day of attacks on Iranian targets in the Hormuz area. A US official described Bandar Abbas as a central hub for Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps operations, through which ammunition, supplies and reinforcements are moved. In response, Iran has stepped up attacks on American bases in Jordan, Qatar, Bahrain, Iraq and Kuwait, according to US and Israeli sources. The IRGC also claimed to have struck a US base in Syria, though American troops had withdrawn from that site months earlier. Tehran has so far refrained from direct attacks on Israel, a restraint that Israeli officials attribute to warnings of a powerful retaliation. The broader conflict, which began with a joint US-Israeli operation on 28 February 2026, has not achieved its initial aim of regime change, US intelligence assessments acknowledge, and Iran’s nuclear programme remains functional, with key materials buried beyond the reach of conventional munitions. Negotiations on a new nuclear deal have stalled, and the coming days are expected to determine whether the US moves to a wider phase of the war.

Divergence — who tells it how
Axis: Preparazione militare vs. Condanna dell'aggressione
29%Medium
3 blocs · positions from −0.70 to 0.00
Oppositori dell'offensivaSostenitori della deterrenza
IRNISRRUS
Divergence between press blocs
Iranian & allied press−0.70critical
Israeli press0.00neutral
Russian & CIS press−0.40critical
Iranian & allied press−0.70
Voice

Iran denounces the imminent aggression and prepares to defend itself.

Mechanismvittimizzazione

By presenting the plane deployment as a concrete threat and emphasizing civilian targets, it constructs an image of an innocent victim that legitimizes a defensive response.

Omission

The omission of Trump's lack of final decision and the preparatory nature of the deployment.

AlarmVictimhood
Israeli press0.00
Voice

Israel coordinates with the United States to ensure operational readiness in case of escalation.

Mechanismpragmatismo logistico

By emphasizing logistical aspects and the lack of a final decision, it normalizes the idea of a military operation as a standard procedure.

Omission

The omission of discussion of humanitarian consequences and the Iranian perspective.

PragmatismUrgency
Russian & CIS press−0.40
Voice

Russia warns against the American escalation and denounces the preparation of a large-scale attack on Iran.

Mechanismdenuncia di escalation

By using escalation language and emphasizing lack of transparency, it constructs a threat picture that legitimizes a confrontational stance.

Omission

The omission of the Israeli role and the context of Iran's nuclear program.

AlarmSkepticism

Broaden your view

Read more
Breaking
Messi’s ‘immense pain’ and pride after Argentina’s World Cup final loss·When flamingos walked the streets and a toilet crossed the sea·Trump and new UK premier Burnham discuss Hormuz mine clearance in first call·Burnham Removes VAT on Household Electricity in First Policy Move·Khalil al-Hayya Elected Hamas Political Chief in Narrow Vote, Shifting Gaza Negotiation Dynamics·Lebanese Army Enters Pilot Zone as Aoun Presses Trump for Full Israeli Withdrawal·Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Claim Strikes on US Bases and Amazon Data Centre Across Middle East·Woman, 25, stabbed to death in Córdoba; ex-partner with prior violence conviction arrested·Messi’s ‘immense pain’ and pride after Argentina’s World Cup final loss·When flamingos walked the streets and a toilet crossed the sea·Trump and new UK premier Burnham discuss Hormuz mine clearance in first call·Burnham Removes VAT on Household Electricity in First Policy Move·Khalil al-Hayya Elected Hamas Political Chief in Narrow Vote, Shifting Gaza Negotiation Dynamics·Lebanese Army Enters Pilot Zone as Aoun Presses Trump for Full Israeli Withdrawal·Iran’s Revolutionary Guards Claim Strikes on US Bases and Amazon Data Centre Across Middle East·Woman, 25, stabbed to death in Córdoba; ex-partner with prior violence conviction arrested·
Upd. 07:34 PM5 languages · 10 outlets
PreviousDefense & SecurityNext
10 outlets|5 languages|4 min read
Friday, July 17, 2026

US to send dozens more refuelling planes to Israel as Trump weighs wider Iran strikes

The deployment, requested by Washington, would restore the fleet to early-war levels and enable expanded operations against Iranian infrastructure and nuclear sites, according to officials.

The United States has informed Israel that it will deploy dozens of additional aerial refuelling aircraft in the coming days, a move that US and Israeli officials say is preparation for a possible expansion of military operations against Iran. The notification, reported by Axios and confirmed by multiple regional and international outlets, comes as President Donald Trump reviews new military options presented during a White House Situation Room meeting on Tuesday. According to those officials, the plans under consideration go beyond the current campaign focused on the Strait of Hormuz and include strikes on Iranian power plants, further attacks on nuclear facilities to bury enriched uranium deeper underground, and a possible bombardment of the Pickaxe Mountain site, a suspected nuclear facility under construction.

Viewed from Washington, the additional refuelling aircraft — which would bring the total deployed in Israel to roughly the level seen at the start of the conflict — are intended to sustain longer-range air operations. US forces currently operate around 30 tankers from Ben Gurion International Airport near Tel Aviv and a similar number from Ramon Airport in the south. Israeli officials told Axios that the US military prefers Ben Gurion because other regional bases are considered more exposed to Iranian missile and drone attacks. The Trump administration has formally asked the Israeli government to accommodate the extra planes, with the final decision resting with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The US has not yet taken a final decision on escalation, but officials cited in the reports say Trump appears ready to inflict what one described as “sufficient damage” to compel Tehran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and accept American demands on its nuclear programme.

Inside Israel, the deployment has triggered a political dispute. The concentration of US tankers at Ben Gurion has already caused severe congestion, and the transport ministry, led by Miri Regev, has warned that without relocating some aircraft, thousands of civilian flights and tens of thousands of passenger tickets could be cancelled at the peak of the summer travel season. Regev, a close ally of Netanyahu, has demanded the planes be moved or their number capped at 20. The Israel Defense Forces and the defence ministry oppose the demand, arguing that alternative airfields in the Negev desert do not meet US operational requirements. With Israeli elections three months away, the potential disruption to civilian air traffic is seen by analysts in Israel as a political liability for the ruling coalition.

Meanwhile, the military tempo on both sides has intensified. US forces struck at least seven bridges around the port city of Bandar Abbas on Thursday, the fifth consecutive day of attacks on Iranian targets in the Hormuz area. A US official described Bandar Abbas as a central hub for Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps operations, through which ammunition, supplies and reinforcements are moved. In response, Iran has stepped up attacks on American bases in Jordan, Qatar, Bahrain, Iraq and Kuwait, according to US and Israeli sources. The IRGC also claimed to have struck a US base in Syria, though American troops had withdrawn from that site months earlier. Tehran has so far refrained from direct attacks on Israel, a restraint that Israeli officials attribute to warnings of a powerful retaliation. The broader conflict, which began with a joint US-Israeli operation on 28 February 2026, has not achieved its initial aim of regime change, US intelligence assessments acknowledge, and Iran’s nuclear programme remains functional, with key materials buried beyond the reach of conventional munitions. Negotiations on a new nuclear deal have stalled, and the coming days are expected to determine whether the US moves to a wider phase of the war.

Divergence — who tells it how
Axis: Preparazione militare vs. Condanna dell'aggressione
29%Medium
3 blocs · positions from −0.70 to 0.00
Oppositori dell'offensivaSostenitori della deterrenza
IRNISRRUS
Divergence between press blocs
Iranian & allied press−0.70critical
Israeli press0.00neutral
Russian & CIS press−0.40critical
Iranian & allied press−0.70
Voice

Iran denounces the imminent aggression and prepares to defend itself.

Mechanismvittimizzazione

By presenting the plane deployment as a concrete threat and emphasizing civilian targets, it constructs an image of an innocent victim that legitimizes a defensive response.

Omission

The omission of Trump's lack of final decision and the preparatory nature of the deployment.

AlarmVictimhood
Israeli press0.00
Voice

Israel coordinates with the United States to ensure operational readiness in case of escalation.

Mechanismpragmatismo logistico

By emphasizing logistical aspects and the lack of a final decision, it normalizes the idea of a military operation as a standard procedure.

Omission

The omission of discussion of humanitarian consequences and the Iranian perspective.

PragmatismUrgency
Russian & CIS press−0.40
Voice

Russia warns against the American escalation and denounces the preparation of a large-scale attack on Iran.

Mechanismdenuncia di escalation

By using escalation language and emphasizing lack of transparency, it constructs a threat picture that legitimizes a confrontational stance.

Omission

The omission of the Israeli role and the context of Iran's nuclear program.

AlarmSkepticism

This story appeared in

10 outlets · 5 languages

Broaden your view

From Geopolitics & Politics

Trump guarantees Netanyahu will not be arrested on US soil, countering New York mayor’s ICC enforcement talk

10 languages · 29 outlets

From Economy & Markets

Brent crude tops $90 for first time since June as US-Iran strikes intensify

8 languages · 21 outlets

From Technology

China’s Kimi K3 model jolts markets, then hits compute ceiling

4 languages · 10 outlets

Read more