
Trump notifies Congress of plan to revoke Syria’s state sponsor of terrorism designation
The decision, announced at the NATO summit in Ankara, triggers a 45-day congressional review and marks a decisive shift in Washington’s posture towards Damascus.
President Donald Trump has formally notified the US Congress of his administration’s intent to remove Syria from the list of state sponsors of terrorism, a designation in place since 1979. Secretary of State Marco Rubio confirmed the notification on Wednesday, stating that the delisting would take effect after a 45-day legislative review period, unless lawmakers take the unlikely step of blocking it. The announcement came as Trump met Syria’s interim President Ahmed al-Sharaa on the sidelines of the NATO summit in Ankara, where the American leader declared, “I think I will, yeah. Why wouldn’t I? He’s done a great job.”
According to the State Department, the decision rests on formal assurances from Sharaa that Syria will not support acts of international terrorism in the future, as well as what Rubio described as “positive changes and counterterrorism actions” taken by the new government. In a letter to Sharaa seen by Reuters, Trump wrote that the move would remove all barriers to rebuilding the country and that US companies were ready to invest. Viewed from Washington, the step is the culmination of a year-long recalibration: the administration had already lifted most sanctions, revoked the Caesar Act, and removed Sharaa and his Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham movement from terrorist lists, arguing that the fall of the Assad regime had eliminated the original rationale for the designation.
Regional reactions underscore the geopolitical stakes. Israeli officials have repeatedly voiced misgivings, and the Israeli military has conducted airstrikes on Syrian territory, viewing Damascus as a historic adversary. Trump had publicly pressed Syria to normalise ties with Israel, but proceeded with the delisting despite no tangible progress on that front. By contrast, Turkey, which hosted the summit, has been a key backer of Sharaa’s government and coordinated with Washington on the reunification effort. Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states have pledged billions in investment and aid, contingent on Syria’s reintegration into the global financial system. In the US Congress, a bipartisan group of lawmakers had urged the administration to lift the designation, calling it “the most significant remaining legal impediment to Syria’s reconstruction.”
The state sponsor of terrorism label, first applied under Hafez al-Assad, had barred most US foreign assistance, defence exports, and financial transactions, and created legal risks for any business operating in Syria. Its removal is expected to unlock international trade and investment, facilitate the work of firms like Chevron and ConocoPhillips that have already signed preliminary agreements with the Syrian national oil company, and allow Damascus to access the international banking system. Sanctions targeting Bashar al-Assad, his associates, and individuals accused of human rights abuses remain in force. With the delisting, only Iran, North Korea, and Cuba will remain on the US terror blacklist. The 45-day congressional review is now underway; barring legislative obstruction, the decision will become final in late August.
| Atlantic / Anglosphere press | +1.00 | aligned |
|---|---|---|
| Russian & CIS press | 0.00 | neutral |
| Sub-Saharan African press | −0.20 | neutral |
The removal of Syria from the terrorism list is a victory for diplomacy and a natural step in the country's rehabilitation.
By presenting the decision as the logical conclusion of al-Sharaa's successful rehabilitation and the last hurdle to reintegration, the narrative normalizes the move and downplays any potential risks or controversies.
The narrative omits al-Sharaa's background as a former jihadist fighter and the decades-long history of the designation, which could raise questions about the decision's wisdom.
The US decision to remove Syria from the terrorism list is a routine diplomatic action, reported without endorsement or criticism.
By focusing on the historical fact of the designation and the simple statement of Trump, the report avoids taking a position and implies the decision is unremarkable.
The report omits any mention of al-Sharaa's controversial background or the broader implications for regional stability, which are present in other blocs' coverage.
The US decision to remove Syria from the terrorism list is questionable given al-Sharaa's background as a former jihadist.
By inserting the detail of al-Sharaa's militant past, the narrative subtly casts doubt on the legitimacy of the Syrian leader and the wisdom of the US move.
The narrative omits the positive aspects of al-Sharaa's rehabilitation efforts and the international community's support for the move, which are present in the atlantica bloc.
Broaden your view
SK Hynix’s $26.5bn US listing sets record as AI chip demand defies geopolitical jitters
4 languages · 8 outlets
From TechnologyMeta Halts AI Image Tool After Global Backlash as EU Cites Addictive Design
8 languages · 16 outlets
From Science & HealthCarney’s Saudi Visit and Iran Overture Signal Canada’s Trade-First Pivot
2 languages · 5 outlets