
Unreleased Documentary Reveals Lindsey Graham’s Private Push for Iran War
Hundreds of hours of footage show the late senator urging Trump toward military action, at times exceeding Netanyahu’s appetite for escalation, and reveal his fixation on toppling Tehran.
Unreleased documentary footage reviewed by The Wall Street Journal reveals that the late US Senator Lindsey Graham conducted a years-long private campaign to draw the United States into direct military confrontation with Iran, at times advocating measures more aggressive than those Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was prepared to support. The recordings, captured by British filmmaker Alex Holder for a forthcoming documentary whose working title, “Lindsey’s Game,” reflects Graham’s own characterisation of foreign policy as a game, show the senator repeatedly pressing President Donald Trump to authorise strikes and join Israeli operations. They include a plan in early March to fly to Florida and persuade Trump to bomb Hezbollah targets in Lebanon.
Viewed from Washington, Graham emerges as a central architect of the push for military action, celebrating the February strikes on Iran with visible emotion and telling his crew that Trump was “excited” about the operation. According to the footage, Graham believed the Iranian regime would collapse within three to four weeks and worked to rally Saudi Arabia and other regional actors behind the campaign. From Jerusalem, however, the recordings capture a more cautious calculus. In a 4 March telephone call, Netanyahu dissuaded Graham from seeking direct US involvement in Lebanon, arguing that opening a second front while the Iran campaign was underway would be strategically premature and risk triggering an unrestrained Hezbollah response. Graham accepted the prime minister’s advice, calling it “good counsel,” and refocused on the primary objective of toppling the government in Tehran.
The documentary, filmed with extraordinary access from 2023 until Graham’s death this month, also documents his diplomatic shuttling—including meetings with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman to promote the war project and sessions with Mossad officials—and his growing frustration with Trump’s subsequent diplomacy. When the US president signed a preliminary agreement with Iran in June, Graham privately expressed anger that Trump was “wavering,” and in his final weeks he appeared exhausted yet fixated on closing what he called the “Iran file” before dying. His predictions of a swift Iranian collapse proved inaccurate, and the footage shows him lamenting that the administration was not adequately promoting the war’s achievements.
The Israeli government has not commented on the leaked recordings. The documentary is expected to be released in the coming months, offering what its director describes as an unvarnished look at the senator’s final years and his role in shaping US Middle East policy. The material is likely to fuel debate in Washington and allied capitals over the extent of legislative influence on executive war-making decisions and the gap between private advocacy and public positioning.
| Israeli press | −0.20 | neutral |
|---|---|---|
| Russian & CIS press | −0.50 | critical |
| Iranian & allied press | −0.90 | critical |
| Southeast Asian press | 0.00 | neutral |
Israel presents itself as a responsible actor that restrains American warmongering, showing caution where Graham wanted escalation.
By contrasting Graham's aggression with Netanyahu's prudence, the narrative legitimizes Israel's position as moderate and responsible.
It omits Netanyahu's own past aggressive stances toward Iran, which could contradict the image of restraint.
Russia denounces American warmongering plans, warning against direct US involvement in the Middle East.
By presenting Graham's plan as an escalation attempt, the Russian narrative legitimizes its own opposition to American interventionism.
It omits Netanyahu's role in supporting military actions, focusing solely on Graham as the sole aggressor.
Iran exposes the American warmongering obsession, denouncing Graham's cynicism in treating war as a game.
By using the 'game' metaphor and highlighting Graham's extremism, the Iranian narrative paints the US as an irrational and dangerous threat.
It omits Netanyahu's role as a restraint, which could have softened the narrative of a united front against Iran.
Southeast Asia reports the facts without taking sides, describing the episode as a normal diplomatic maneuver.
The narrative merely summarizes the WSJ information, without adding interpretations, creating an effect of objectivity.
It omits any analysis of regional implications or the broader context of US-Iran tensions, limiting itself to a bare chronicle.
Broaden your view
US replaces temporary tariffs with permanent forced-labour levies on 60 nations
6 languages · 18 outlets
From TechnologyNvidia leads open-source AI security push after rogue model hack
7 languages · 16 outlets
From Science & HealthScreen Overuse Reshapes Young Brains as Governments Move to Regulate
3 languages · 8 outlets