
Trump Threatens to Bomb Iranian Bridges and Power Plants for Each Ship Attack in Hormuz
The US president’s warning marks a sharp escalation in the five-month conflict, as Washington and Tehran exchange strikes and global oil prices climb.
President Donald Trump declared on Wednesday that the United States would destroy one Iranian bridge or power plant, including those in or near Tehran, for every future attack on a vessel in the Strait of Hormuz. The statement, posted on his Truth Social platform, specified that the retaliation would apply regardless of whether Iran used missiles, rockets, drones or other weapons. The threat came as the US military conducted an eleventh consecutive night of air strikes against what it described as Iranian military command centres, maritime assets and drone infrastructure, aimed at degrading Tehran’s ability to threaten commercial shipping.
Viewed from Washington, the move is presented as a calibrated deterrent to force the reopening of the strategic waterway, through which one-fifth of globally traded oil and gas passed in peacetime before the conflict. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, speaking at a Southeast Asian ministers’ meeting in Manila, said the US remained open to a negotiated settlement but accused Iran of failing to honour commitments made under a preliminary ceasefire that collapsed in June. The Pentagon has put the cost of the war at $37.5 billion, with 18 American service members killed, and the White House faces domestic pressure ahead of midterm elections as gasoline prices rise.
Iranian state media reported that air defences were activated over Tehran and explosions were heard in several provinces, including near the Bushehr nuclear power plant. The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps claimed responsibility for drone and missile attacks on US bases in Jordan, Kuwait and Bahrain, and the foreign ministry in Tehran insisted that diplomatic exchanges with Washington through mediators were continuing. Iranian officials have separately rejected as a “fabricated pretext” US allegations of an undeclared nuclear enrichment site at Kolang mountain, near Natanz, which Trump identified as a potential target. International legal experts, cited by multiple outlets, have warned that strikes on civilian infrastructure could constitute war crimes under international humanitarian law.
The conflict, which began in late February with US and Israeli strikes that regional media say killed Iran’s supreme leader, has increasingly centred on control of the Strait of Hormuz. Iran has fired on commercial vessels it says failed to coordinate with its authorities, while the US has reimposed a naval blockade on Iranian ports. The Iran-aligned Houthi movement in Yemen has separately threatened Saudi shipping in the Red Sea, placing a second major trade chokepoint at risk. Benchmark Brent crude rose to around $94 a barrel. Diplomatic efforts, including a recent Pakistani mediation initiative, have yet to yield a new ceasefire, and the US military command indicated that operations would continue.
| Iranian & allied press | −0.80 | critical |
|---|---|---|
| Atlantic / Anglosphere press | 0.00 | neutral |
| Russian & CIS press | −0.50 | critical |
| Arab Gulf press | −0.70 | critical |
Iran dismisses American threats as propaganda and demonstrates its own resilience.
By framing the threat as a sign of US weakness, the narrative inverts the power dynamic, making the US appear desperate and Iran in control.
Omits the context of Iranian attacks on ships that provoked the threat.
The United States maintains a firm stance but remains open to dialogue.
By balancing the threat with mentions of diplomatic openings and war costs, the narrative presents the US as both strong and reasonable, avoiding a purely aggressive image.
Omits the legal concerns about targeting civilian infrastructure, which could be considered a war crime.
Russia denounces American aggression and warns of consequences.
By framing the US threat as aggression and highlighting the danger to civilians, the narrative moralizes the conflict and positions Russia as a responsible global actor.
Omits the US perspective of self-defense and the fact that Iran initiated the attacks on ships.
Gulf states warn against the illegality of American threats and call for restraint.
By invoking international law and the concept of war crimes, the narrative delegitimizes the US threat and positions the Gulf states as upholders of legal norms.
Omits the context of Iranian attacks on ships and the US perspective of deterrence.
Broaden your view
New York Mayor Concedes City Cannot Arrest Netanyahu, Urges Federal Action
8 languages · 25 outlets
From Economy & MarketsBrent crude tops $90 for first time since June as US-Iran strikes intensify
8 languages · 21 outlets
From TechnologyOpenAI Models Breach Sandbox, Autonomously Hack Hugging Face
9 languages · 57 outlets