
Trump’s Pledge to Sell F-35s to Turkey Alters Middle East Military Calculus
Trump’s reversal of sanctions and offer of F-35s to Ankara draws sharp Israeli opposition and faces congressional hurdles, as Turkey’s drone capabilities already project power regionally.
At the NATO summit in Ankara, US President Donald Trump announced the lifting of sanctions imposed on Turkey over its 2019 purchase of Russian S-400 air defence systems and signalled a willingness to sell Ankara F-35 stealth fighter jets. The move, which Trump described as a response to Turkey’s loyalty, reverses a policy that saw Washington expel Turkey from the F-35 programme in 2019 and impose CAATSA sanctions in 2020. The announcement was embedded in a display of personal rapport between Trump and President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, with Trump stating he attended the summit only because Erdogan was the host.
Viewed from Washington, the administration frames the shift as a step to repair ties with a NATO ally on the alliance’s southeastern flank. Turkish officials, for their part, regard the pledge as a diplomatic breakthrough that could restore access to advanced US technology and bolster Erdogan’s domestic standing amid a crackdown on the political opposition. In Jerusalem, however, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has mounted a public campaign against the sale, warning it would “destroy the balance of power in the Middle East” and describing Turkey as a regime influenced by the Muslim Brotherhood that threatens the Jewish state. Israeli defence planners, according to analysts cited in regional media, view the F-35 as a cornerstone of their qualitative military edge, and fear that Turkish acquisition would erode Israel’s air superiority and freedom of action.
Beyond the immediate triangle, the potential transfer carries wider regional implications. Turkish defence analysts note that Ankara has already demonstrated power-projection capabilities through its drone deployments in Libya, where Bayraktar TB2s and electronic warfare systems turned the tide of battle in 2019–2020 and established a permanent military footprint. An F-35 acquisition would not create a new capability from scratch but would validate and extend an existing one, potentially altering balances in the Eastern Mediterranean, Syria, and the Black Sea. In New Delhi, strategic observers point to Turkey’s deepening defence cooperation with Pakistan as a factor that could indirectly affect India’s security calculus.
The legal path to a sale, however, remains blocked by US legislation. Congress banned F-35 transfers to Turkey unless it divests the S-400 systems, and lawmakers from both parties have signalled they will oppose any executive waiver. Congressional sources indicate that a joint resolution of disapproval could be introduced, while Moscow’s end-user obligations on the S-400 deal further complicate any removal. The dossier now moves to a legislative test in Washington, where the administration’s ability to deliver on Trump’s pledge will be measured against entrenched congressional scepticism and Israel’s lobbying efforts.
| Israeli press | −0.80 | critical |
|---|---|---|
| Atlantic / Anglosphere press | −0.20 | neutral |
| Indian & South Asian press | −0.30 | critical |
| Arab Levant-Maghreb press | −0.20 | neutral |
Israel firmly rejects the sale of F-35s to Turkey, viewing it as an existential threat to its national security. Netanyahu personally opposes it, citing the Islamist nature of the Turkish regime.
The bloc builds credibility by evoking Israel's technological and military superiority as a pillar of regional order, and presenting Turkey as a hostile and ideologically incompatible actor.
Omits the context of Turkey's NATO membership and the US desire to mend ties with a key ally, as well as the fact that Turkey was previously part of the F-35 program before sanctions.
The Atlantic West cautiously observes the rapprochement between Trump and Erdogan. On one hand, it recognizes the strategic value of keeping Turkey in NATO; on the other, it warns against yielding to an ally that purchased Russian systems.
The bloc legitimizes its position by balancing geopolitical realism (the need to mend ties with Turkey) with the defense of institutional norms (sanctions, congressional opposition), creating a narrative of tension between executive and legislature.
Omits the Israeli perspective of existential threat and the reaction of Arab states, focusing solely on US domestic dynamics and NATO cohesion.
India watches with concern the sale of F-35s to Turkey, as it could strengthen Pakistan, a historical rival. The analysis focuses on implications for the regional power balance.
The bloc builds credibility by linking the F-35 sale to Turkey with the indirect threat posed by Pakistan, using an argument of chain of alliances and technology transfer.
Omits the Israeli perspective of direct threat and Turkey's role in NATO, focusing solely on the Turkey-Pakistan axis and its implications for India.
The Arab world sees the Israeli position as an attempt to maintain air hegemony, while Turkey has the right to strengthen its defensive capabilities.
The bloc makes its criticism plausible by describing Israeli opposition as driven by selfish interests, not real security concerns, using language that dismantles Israeli claims of superiority.
Omits the context of Turkey's violation of sanctions (S-400 purchase) and Israel's genuine security concerns, presenting Israeli opposition as mere selfishness.
Broaden your view
Tax Revenues Surge Across Emerging Markets as Data Reforms Strengthen Fiscal Positions
4 languages · 10 outlets
From TechnologyAI Skills Command Wage Premiums Up to 92% as Cognitive Offloading Concerns Grow
3 languages · 4 outlets
From Science & HealthCarney’s Saudi Visit and Iran Overture Signal Canada’s Trade-First Pivot
2 languages · 5 outlets