
Pakistan urges US and Iran to revive June accord as Hormuz clashes imperil global trade
Islamabad calls for maximum restraint and a return to technical talks under the MoU it mediated, while Washington and Tehran exchange strikes and the Strait of Hormuz becomes a flashpoint.
Pakistan’s foreign ministry on Thursday called on the United States and Iran to halt military operations and resume technical-level negotiations under the Islamabad-mediated memorandum of understanding signed in June. Spokesman Tahir Andrabi told reporters that despite “challenges” in implementing the accord, Pakistan would continue to encourage all sides to end violence and return to the negotiating table. The statement, carried by state and regional media, framed the MoU as an “enduring framework for promoting peace, mutual respect and shared prosperity” and expressed hope for an early normalisation of the situation in the Strait of Hormuz.
According to the terms of the MoU, which was signed on 17 June by the Pakistani prime minister alongside the Iranian and US presidents, the two adversaries were to hold 60 days of technical talks aimed at a final agreement on Iran’s nuclear programme and an end to the war. That window, by US media calculations, expires on 17 August. Pakistani officials note that the military chief of staff, Marshal Asim Munir, was directly involved in the diplomatic effort that produced the deal, and Islamabad says it remains “actively engaged with key parties to support de-escalation efforts and dialogue.”
Viewed from Washington, the resumption of airstrikes this week — which President Donald Trump has described as the end of the truce — has not halted expert-level discussions on the nuclear file, according to the US permanent representative to the UN. From Tehran’s perspective, however, Washington is not honouring the agreement and is conducting what Iranian state-linked outlets characterise as “aggressive attacks,” to which Iran has responded with strikes on US interests in the Gulf. The six-day cycle of strikes and retaliation has centred on the Strait of Hormuz, the conduit for roughly a fifth of global oil consumption, which Iran insists it controls and has officially closed in response to what it terms violations of its sovereignty.
The military escalation has sent global oil prices sharply higher and triggered inflation concerns in economies far from the conflict zone. Pakistan’s foreign ministry explicitly recognised the “urgent need to address the impact of the current situation on global energy supplies and other economic commodities including trade and food security.” Regional mediators, including Qatar and Oman, are also involved in efforts to prevent a wider conflagration, with Iranian diplomatic sources confirming that back-channel contacts continue.
With the 60-day technical track formally still alive but under severe strain, the dossier now hinges on whether the parties can de-escalate sufficiently to return to the table before the August deadline. Pakistan’s intervention signals that the MoU, however battered, remains the only internationally recognised framework for a negotiated exit, even as military logic continues to dictate events on the ground.
| Arab Gulf press | 0.00 | neutral |
|---|---|---|
| Southeast Asian press | 0.00 | neutral |
| Arab Levant-Maghreb press | 0.00 | neutral |
| Iranian & allied press | −0.60 | critical |
Pakistan acts as a neutral mediator, encouraging both sides to resume talks and end violence.
The report presents the news as a straightforward fact, using direct quotes from Pakistan's spokesman without additional analysis, thereby creating an aura of impartiality.
Pakistan's foreign office speaks with measured diplomacy, urging an end to violence and emphasizing the importance of safe navigation.
The report uses direct quotes from the spokesman to convey Pakistan's position, framing the crisis as a technical issue of maritime security rather than a geopolitical confrontation.
Pakistan issues an urgent and firm call for restraint, positioning itself as a responsible mediator that upholds the MOU as the only viable framework.
The report amplifies Pakistan's moral authority by repeatedly invoking the MOU and the principle that all conflicts must be resolved through dialogue, thereby universalizing Pakistan's mediation as the legitimate path.
Iran speaks as the aggrieved party, condemning US aggression and calling for an end to attacks, while portraying itself as a victim seeking justice.
The report uses emotionally charged language such as 'terrorist army' to delegitimize the US, and omits Iranian retaliatory actions to present a one-sided narrative of victimhood.
The bloc omits any mention of Iranian retaliatory attacks on US interests, which are present in other blocs' reports, thereby presenting a one-sided picture of US aggression.
Broaden your view
Argentine household credit stress deepens as emerging markets navigate divergent financial pressures
5 languages · 8 outlets
From TechnologyAustralia Adopts Mandatory AI Framework as Chinese Models Reshape Race
3 languages · 8 outlets
From Science & HealthColombia Court Mandates Holistic Review for Reconstructive Surgery Denials
3 languages · 6 outlets