Sign in
Edition of 06:00 CETSunday, July 12, 2026
311 outlets · 17 languages315 briefings today
Defense & SecurityTuesday, July 7, 2026

Nato unveils $50bn in defence deals as Trump vents frustration at Ankara summit

Allies announce contracts for drones, radar systems and transport aircraft while the US president criticises European partners over Iran war support and threatens further troop withdrawals.

Nato leaders opened their annual summit in Ankara on Tuesday by disclosing defence procurement contracts worth at least $50bn, a move officials described as a direct response to US demands for higher European military spending. The announcement was immediately overshadowed by President Donald Trump, who told his Turkish counterpart Recep Tayyip Erdoğan that he was “very disappointed with Nato” and might have boycotted the gathering had it not been held in Turkey. Trump singled out Britain, France, Germany and Italy for refusing to assist the United States in its war against Iran, stating that allies “weren’t treated well” despite decades of American investment in the alliance.

According to a Nato diplomat, the contracts include $12bn for next-generation drones, surveillance aircraft and military planes, $5bn for Swedish Saab airborne radar systems to replace ageing Boeing platforms, $2.7bn for Northrop Grumman maritime surveillance drones, and $4.3bn for Airbus A400M transport aircraft. Secretary-General Mark Rutte separately announced that allies would invest more than $40bn over five years in counter-drone capabilities. Rutte presented a chart dubbed the “Trump Trillion” to illustrate that European and Canadian defence spending has risen by $1.2 trillion since 2017, with this year’s total projected at $634bn — an 11 per cent increase over 2024, though slower than the previous year’s 19 per cent jump. Four members — Poland and the three Baltic states — already exceed the alliance’s new 3.5 per cent of GDP military spending target, while several others, including Belgium, Spain and Slovenia, remain near or below the old 2 per cent benchmark.

Viewed from Washington, the spending pledges have not eased Trump’s core grievance that European allies are free-riding on American power. The president used his press appearance with Erdoğan to air a litany of complaints: he accused Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni of making “a mistake” by denying US access to bases for Iran strikes, suggested UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer had damaged his political future by not heeding wartime requests, and reiterated that the United States still intended to acquire Greenland from Denmark. Trump also lifted sanctions imposed on Turkey in 2020 over its purchase of Russian S-400 air defence systems and signalled willingness to sell Ankara F-35 fighter jets, a move European diplomats interpret as an effort to deepen bilateral ties at the expense of alliance cohesion.

European governments view the summit as a damage-limitation exercise. According to officials in Brussels, the primary objective is to buy time for a gradual rebalancing of the alliance, in which US conventional force levels in Europe could halve over several years while the American nuclear umbrella remains intact. Analysts in London and Paris note that even if the immediate goal is to placate Trump, the underlying trajectory points toward a more Europeanised Nato, one in which decision-making weight would shift as European members assume greater responsibility for continental defence. The summit is expected to conclude with a shortened final communiqué and a renewed pledge of support for Ukraine, but the unresolved tensions over Iran and the durability of the US security guarantee leave the alliance’s long-term cohesion in question.

Divergence — who tells it how
8%Low
3 blocs · positions from −0.30 to −0.10
CriticalFavorable
EURATLGLF
Divergence between press blocs
Continental European press−0.20neutral
Atlantic / Anglosphere press−0.10neutral
Arab Gulf press−0.30critical
Continental European press−0.20
Voice

Europe strives to meet American demands, but Trump remains dissatisfied, questioning Atlantic solidarity.

Mechanismtest di lealtà

The bloc presents European efforts as substantial but conditional on US approval, creating a narrative of perpetual inadequacy. The 'loyalty test' rhetoric suggests that Europe can never fully satisfy Washington's demands.

Omission

The bloc omits the Iran-related tensions that other blocs highlight as a major factor at the summit, focusing solely on the US-Europe spending dispute.

SkepticismPragmatism
Atlantic / Anglosphere press−0.10
Voice

The alliance takes concrete steps to meet US demands, but Trump's predictable dissatisfaction shows the limits of appeasement.

Mechanismprofezia di insoddisfazione

The bloc uses a 'predictability' frame to normalize Trump's criticism, implying that no amount of spending will satisfy him. The 'prophecy of dissatisfaction' rhetoric suggests that tension is inevitable.

Omission

The bloc omits the Iran-related tensions and the internal European difficulties in meeting spending targets, focusing instead on the US-Europe dynamic.

PragmatismSkepticism
Arab Gulf press−0.30
Voice

The summit's arms deals are overshadowed by the Iran conflict, and Trump's anger at European allies for not backing the US on Iran threatens alliance unity.

Mechanismriproiezione

The bloc introduces the Iran dimension as the central tension, reframing the summit from a spending dispute to a geopolitical rift over Iran. The 'projection' shifts focus to Gulf regional interests.

Omission

The bloc omits the European internal difficulties in meeting spending targets and the 'predictability' frame of Trump's reaction, focusing instead on the Iran conflict as the main story.

AlarmSkepticism

Broaden your view

Read more
Breaking
Choosing Solitude: Women Turn Away from Perfection’s Demands·Weekend Road Crashes in Argentina, Brazil, Nigeria Kill at Least Fifteen·Sensor Data Vindicates England as Cable Controversy Mars Norway Defeat·Tuchel fumes, Bellingham scoffs as England scrape into World Cup semi-finals·Tour de France Cuts Stage in Historic First Due to Intense Heatwave·Early Menopause Raises Cardiovascular Risk by 30%, Global Study Finds — Exercise Gains Preventive Role·Lebanon Confirms Rome Talks as US Advances Pilot Zone Plan·Iran Shuts Strait of Hormuz Indefinitely, US Responds with Third Round of Strikes·Choosing Solitude: Women Turn Away from Perfection’s Demands·Weekend Road Crashes in Argentina, Brazil, Nigeria Kill at Least Fifteen·Sensor Data Vindicates England as Cable Controversy Mars Norway Defeat·Tuchel fumes, Bellingham scoffs as England scrape into World Cup semi-finals·Tour de France Cuts Stage in Historic First Due to Intense Heatwave·Early Menopause Raises Cardiovascular Risk by 30%, Global Study Finds — Exercise Gains Preventive Role·Lebanon Confirms Rome Talks as US Advances Pilot Zone Plan·Iran Shuts Strait of Hormuz Indefinitely, US Responds with Third Round of Strikes·
Upd. 03:11 AM5 languages · 11 outlets
PreviousDefense & SecurityNext
11 outlets|5 languages|3 min read
Tuesday, July 7, 2026

Nato unveils $50bn in defence deals as Trump vents frustration at Ankara summit

Allies announce contracts for drones, radar systems and transport aircraft while the US president criticises European partners over Iran war support and threatens further troop withdrawals.

Nato leaders opened their annual summit in Ankara on Tuesday by disclosing defence procurement contracts worth at least $50bn, a move officials described as a direct response to US demands for higher European military spending. The announcement was immediately overshadowed by President Donald Trump, who told his Turkish counterpart Recep Tayyip Erdoğan that he was “very disappointed with Nato” and might have boycotted the gathering had it not been held in Turkey. Trump singled out Britain, France, Germany and Italy for refusing to assist the United States in its war against Iran, stating that allies “weren’t treated well” despite decades of American investment in the alliance.

According to a Nato diplomat, the contracts include $12bn for next-generation drones, surveillance aircraft and military planes, $5bn for Swedish Saab airborne radar systems to replace ageing Boeing platforms, $2.7bn for Northrop Grumman maritime surveillance drones, and $4.3bn for Airbus A400M transport aircraft. Secretary-General Mark Rutte separately announced that allies would invest more than $40bn over five years in counter-drone capabilities. Rutte presented a chart dubbed the “Trump Trillion” to illustrate that European and Canadian defence spending has risen by $1.2 trillion since 2017, with this year’s total projected at $634bn — an 11 per cent increase over 2024, though slower than the previous year’s 19 per cent jump. Four members — Poland and the three Baltic states — already exceed the alliance’s new 3.5 per cent of GDP military spending target, while several others, including Belgium, Spain and Slovenia, remain near or below the old 2 per cent benchmark.

Viewed from Washington, the spending pledges have not eased Trump’s core grievance that European allies are free-riding on American power. The president used his press appearance with Erdoğan to air a litany of complaints: he accused Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni of making “a mistake” by denying US access to bases for Iran strikes, suggested UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer had damaged his political future by not heeding wartime requests, and reiterated that the United States still intended to acquire Greenland from Denmark. Trump also lifted sanctions imposed on Turkey in 2020 over its purchase of Russian S-400 air defence systems and signalled willingness to sell Ankara F-35 fighter jets, a move European diplomats interpret as an effort to deepen bilateral ties at the expense of alliance cohesion.

European governments view the summit as a damage-limitation exercise. According to officials in Brussels, the primary objective is to buy time for a gradual rebalancing of the alliance, in which US conventional force levels in Europe could halve over several years while the American nuclear umbrella remains intact. Analysts in London and Paris note that even if the immediate goal is to placate Trump, the underlying trajectory points toward a more Europeanised Nato, one in which decision-making weight would shift as European members assume greater responsibility for continental defence. The summit is expected to conclude with a shortened final communiqué and a renewed pledge of support for Ukraine, but the unresolved tensions over Iran and the durability of the US security guarantee leave the alliance’s long-term cohesion in question.

Divergence — who tells it how
8%Low
3 blocs · positions from −0.30 to −0.10
CriticalFavorable
EURATLGLF
Divergence between press blocs
Continental European press−0.20neutral
Atlantic / Anglosphere press−0.10neutral
Arab Gulf press−0.30critical
Continental European press−0.20
Voice

Europe strives to meet American demands, but Trump remains dissatisfied, questioning Atlantic solidarity.

Mechanismtest di lealtà

The bloc presents European efforts as substantial but conditional on US approval, creating a narrative of perpetual inadequacy. The 'loyalty test' rhetoric suggests that Europe can never fully satisfy Washington's demands.

Omission

The bloc omits the Iran-related tensions that other blocs highlight as a major factor at the summit, focusing solely on the US-Europe spending dispute.

SkepticismPragmatism
Atlantic / Anglosphere press−0.10
Voice

The alliance takes concrete steps to meet US demands, but Trump's predictable dissatisfaction shows the limits of appeasement.

Mechanismprofezia di insoddisfazione

The bloc uses a 'predictability' frame to normalize Trump's criticism, implying that no amount of spending will satisfy him. The 'prophecy of dissatisfaction' rhetoric suggests that tension is inevitable.

Omission

The bloc omits the Iran-related tensions and the internal European difficulties in meeting spending targets, focusing instead on the US-Europe dynamic.

PragmatismSkepticism
Arab Gulf press−0.30
Voice

The summit's arms deals are overshadowed by the Iran conflict, and Trump's anger at European allies for not backing the US on Iran threatens alliance unity.

Mechanismriproiezione

The bloc introduces the Iran dimension as the central tension, reframing the summit from a spending dispute to a geopolitical rift over Iran. The 'projection' shifts focus to Gulf regional interests.

Omission

The bloc omits the European internal difficulties in meeting spending targets and the 'predictability' frame of Trump's reaction, focusing instead on the Iran conflict as the main story.

AlarmSkepticism

This story appeared in

11 outlets · 5 languages

Broaden your view

From Geopolitics & Politics

Iran’s Supreme Leader Vows Revenge as Trump Threatens to ‘Decimate’ Iran

6 languages · 24 outlets

From Economy & Markets

Housing’s shifting fault lines: credit, demography and policy collide

4 languages · 6 outlets

From Technology

OpenAI Launches ChatGPT Work Agent and Shutters Atlas Browser

7 languages · 7 outlets

Read more