
Meta Explores $10 Billion Compute Deal with Anthropic as AI Infrastructure Race Intensifies
Preliminary talks could see the social media giant lease data centre capacity to the AI startup, mirroring a larger agreement between Anthropic and Elon Musk’s xAI.
Meta Platforms has entered preliminary discussions to lease computing capacity from its data centres to Anthropic, the developer of the Claude chatbot, in a deal that could reach $10 billion over two years, according to a report by The New York Times. Shares of Meta, which had been down nearly 6 percent in New York trading on Friday, trimmed losses to around 2.7 percent after the news emerged, reflecting investor interest in the potential diversification of revenue beyond digital advertising.
Anthropic approached Meta with the proposal in June, and the talks remain at an early stage with no terms finalised. Under the framework discussed, Anthropic would make monthly payments over the contract period, and either party could terminate the agreement early. The negotiations are complicated by the fact that Meta does not yet have a formalised business unit for selling external access to its computing infrastructure, though Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg told shareholders in May that the company receives such requests “almost every week” and that entering the cloud computing market was “definitely a possibility.”
The potential Meta agreement follows a pattern of aggressive spending by Anthropic to secure the vast processing power required to train and run advanced AI models. In May, the company signed a deal to pay xAI, Elon Musk’s artificial intelligence venture, nearly $45 billion over three years for capacity across multiple data centres, including the Colossus 1 facility in Memphis, Tennessee. Anthropic also separately contracted with cloud provider Akamai Technologies for $1.8 billion. Viewed from Silicon Valley, these moves signal that the AI startup, which is preparing for an initial public offering, is prioritising guaranteed access to compute over building its own infrastructure, even as it competes with Meta in AI development.
For Meta, the talks represent a strategic step toward monetising the tens of billions of dollars it is pouring into AI infrastructure. The company has forecast capital expenditures of $125 billion to $145 billion in 2026, largely driven by data centre construction. Leasing excess capacity would position Meta as a competitor to specialised “neocloud” providers such as CoreWeave and Nebius, which have built businesses renting GPU access to AI developers. Industry observers in New York note that the move would also help Meta offset the cost of its own AI ambitions while keeping its infrastructure fully utilised.
Both Meta and Anthropic declined to comment. The discussions may not result in a binding agreement, and the structure of any deal could change. The next factual milestone to watch is whether Meta formally establishes a cloud services division, a step that would signal a concrete shift in strategy and could accelerate similar negotiations with other AI firms.
| Russian & CIS press | +0.20 | neutral |
|---|---|---|
| Latin American press | +0.30 | aligned |
| Atlantic / Anglosphere press | +0.10 | neutral |
| Chinese press | +0.10 | neutral |
Meta is wisely leveraging its data center investments to create a new revenue stream by leasing capacity to Anthropic for $10 billion.
By highlighting the $10 billion figure and the potential for Meta to build a new AI business, the bloc frames the deal as a rational financial decision, downplaying any risks or competitive implications.
The bloc omits the context of Anthropic's larger deal with SpaceX and the stock market's reaction, which would introduce competitive dynamics and financial risk.
Meta is smartly diversifying its revenue by leasing data center capacity to Anthropic, reducing reliance on advertising.
By focusing on Meta's need to diversify from advertising and Anthropic's need for computing power, the bloc presents the deal as a mutually beneficial strategic move, ignoring potential antitrust or competitive concerns.
The bloc omits the comparison with Anthropic's deal with SpaceX and the market's response, which would highlight competitive pressures and financial volatility.
The deal reveals the desperate shortage of AI computing power, and Meta's infrastructure spending positions it to become a key cloud provider.
By emphasizing the scarcity of computing power and Meta's massive infrastructure investment, the bloc creates a narrative of strategic necessity, making the deal seem inevitable and rational.
The bloc omits the comparison with Anthropic's deal with SpaceX and the market's response, which would highlight competitive pressures and financial volatility.
The deal is a fraction of Anthropic's commitment to SpaceX, and Meta's stock dip shows market skepticism, but it still represents a strategic diversification.
By juxtaposing the Meta deal with the larger SpaceX deal and noting the stock market reaction, the bloc introduces a comparative framework that highlights competitive dynamics and market sentiment, tempering the optimism.
The bloc omits the specific scale of Meta's infrastructure investment ($145 billion) and the narrative of acute scarcity, which would reinforce the strategic necessity angle.
Broaden your view
New York Mayor Reviews Legal Basis to Arrest Netanyahu During UN Visit
10 languages · 35 outlets
From Economy & MarketsArgentine household credit stress deepens as emerging markets navigate divergent financial pressures
5 languages · 8 outlets
From Science & HealthBlood test forecasts Alzheimer’s a decade ahead as AI tools and device failures reshape trust in early diagnosis
2 languages · 6 outlets