Sign in
Edition of 10:00 CETFriday, July 24, 2026
325 outlets · 17 languages721 briefings today
Geopolitics & PoliticsSunday, July 19, 2026

Israel’s $50 Million AI-Driven Campaign Aims to Reverse U.S. Public Opinion Slide

Faced with record unfavourable ratings, Israel has deployed AI chatbots, influencer deals, and conservative media contracts to sway Americans, as Democratic lawmakers increasingly break with AIPAC over Gaza.

Israel has funded a covert $50 million influence operation that flooded mobile phones across the United States with AI-generated text messages and planted pro-Israel content on websites designed to shape the outputs of large language models such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini. According to documents and interviews published in The Wall Street Journal, the campaign—run partly by a firm linked to former Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale—combines digital ad buys on conservative media networks with a network of influencers and chatbots posing as peace activists. Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar confirmed that Israel’s 2026 global image budget exceeds $700 million, more than four times the previous year’s allocation, as it confronts a Pew Research Center finding that 60% of U.S. adults now hold an unfavourable view of the country, a figure that climbs to 80% among Democrats and 75% among those aged 18–29.

Viewed from Tel Aviv, the effort is framed as a necessary counter to “misinformation” and rising anti-Semitism. Parscale told Israeli officials his companies were “the largest thing outside of Fox News to help fight misinformation and Jewish hatred.” In Washington, the White House acknowledged the existence of such foreign influence operations, with Vice President J.D. Vance asserting that some within the Israeli government sought to prolong the war with Iran to shape U.S. opinion, and President Donald Trump reportedly agreeing that Israel, alongside other nations, attempts to influence American views. Meanwhile, on Capitol Hill, a record 40 Senate Democrats voted in May against further military aid to Israel, and a symbolic House amendment to cut $3.3 billion in security assistance drew 103 Democratic votes, including former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who declared that “U.S. policy must change.” Democratic primary victories by candidates explicitly opposing AIPAC’s agenda—in New Jersey, Illinois, and New York—signal a deep shift in the party’s base away from unconditional support.

Operationally, the Parscale contract integrated “narrative messaging” into Salem Media Network properties, reaching conservative audiences, while his team separately produced 100 pieces of content monthly targeting Gen Z on TikTok, Instagram, and podcasts. A parallel tactic created websites such as Allyvia.org, designed to make AI chatbots cite them when users ask about the U.S.-Israel alliance. Researchers at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft note that Israel is on track to disclose more spending on U.S. influence activities this year than any other nation. Yet the campaign has drawn scepticism even from allies: former Trump strategist Steve Bannon dismissed it with the quip that “they’re trying to sell something that can’t be sold.” The scale of AI-driven engagement—millions of texts via personas named “Sarah” or “Emma” from the “Friends for Peace” group—triggered unease among recipients who found the automated conversations circular and mechanical.

Amid this push, the American political landscape continues to realign. While U.S. administrations have long employed soft-power tools and other nations—from Qatar to Syria’s former leadership—have retained U.S. firms for image polishing, Israel’s fusion of generative AI with traditional hasbara marks a new threshold. Analysts in European and Middle Eastern capitals observe that declining public support is tied directly to images of destruction in Gaza and the war’s civilian toll, and that no digital campaign can easily override that visual record. The Israeli parliament is expected to debate the 2026 public diplomacy budget later this year, while in Washington, the next congressional foreign aid cycle will test whether the Democratic fractures observed in recent months translate into binding legislative restrictions on security assistance to Israel.

Divergence — who tells it how
Axis: Legittimità di Israele
33%Medium
3 blocs · positions from −0.80 to 0.00
Condanna morale di IsraeleDifesa dell'alleanza con Israele
ISRATLIRN
Divergence between press blocs
Israeli press−0.40critical
Atlantic / Anglosphere press0.00neutral
Iranian & allied press−0.80critical
Israeli press−0.40
Voice

Israel acknowledges its image crisis but responds with a mix of self-criticism and diplomatic pragmatism.

Mechanismautocritica polarizzata

The opinion piece uses moral outrage to expose hypocrisy, while the factual report normalizes the spending as standard practice, creating a tension that legitimizes both perspectives.

Omission

The neutral report omits deep moral critiques, while the opinion ignores strategic reasons for the campaign.

OutragePragmatismSplit voices
Atlantic / Anglosphere press0.00
Voice

The United States balances traditional loyalty with new democratic pressures, maintaining a pragmatic approach to the alliance.

Mechanismtriangolazione

By presenting both AIPAC's slipping grip and the reaffirmation of the alliance, an apparent balance is created that masks the real tension, suggesting foreign policy is above public opinion.

Omission

The specific use of AI in the campaign is omitted, downplaying the scale of Israeli interference.

PragmatismDetachment
Iranian & allied press−0.80
Voice

Iran denounces Israel's manipulation of US opinion via AI as proof of its moral collapse.

Mechanismsmascheratura

The narrative builds credibility by contrasting artificial propaganda with genuine human sentiment, reversing the roles of victim and aggressor.

Omission

Any mention of internal Israeli divisions or the US democratic debate is omitted, which would weaken the portrayal of a monolithic Israel.

OutrageAlarm

Broaden your view

Read more
Breaking
Joshua Returns from Tragedy as Fury Charity Bout Sets Stage for November Clash·EU Split on New US Tariffs as Kallas Condemns Forced‑Labour Rationale·Iran Claims Multiple Drone Strikes on US Bases Across Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait and Qatar·The Untold Story Behind Marc Cucurella’s Unmistakable Hair·One Israeli, Four Palestinians Killed in Contested West Bank Clashes·Gene Therapies Advance Amid Global Scramble for Access·Guardiola Rejects Italy’s Rescue Mission, Pirlo Emerges as Contingency·Heavy Rain, Strong Winds, and Searing Heat: Asia and North Africa Brace for Extreme Weather·Joshua Returns from Tragedy as Fury Charity Bout Sets Stage for November Clash·EU Split on New US Tariffs as Kallas Condemns Forced‑Labour Rationale·Iran Claims Multiple Drone Strikes on US Bases Across Bahrain, Jordan, Kuwait and Qatar·The Untold Story Behind Marc Cucurella’s Unmistakable Hair·One Israeli, Four Palestinians Killed in Contested West Bank Clashes·Gene Therapies Advance Amid Global Scramble for Access·Guardiola Rejects Italy’s Rescue Mission, Pirlo Emerges as Contingency·Heavy Rain, Strong Winds, and Searing Heat: Asia and North Africa Brace for Extreme Weather·
Upd. 05:10 PM5 languages · 8 outlets
PreviousGeopolitics & PoliticsNext
8 outlets|5 languages|3 min read
Sunday, July 19, 2026

Israel’s $50 Million AI-Driven Campaign Aims to Reverse U.S. Public Opinion Slide

Faced with record unfavourable ratings, Israel has deployed AI chatbots, influencer deals, and conservative media contracts to sway Americans, as Democratic lawmakers increasingly break with AIPAC over Gaza.

Israel has funded a covert $50 million influence operation that flooded mobile phones across the United States with AI-generated text messages and planted pro-Israel content on websites designed to shape the outputs of large language models such as ChatGPT and Google Gemini. According to documents and interviews published in The Wall Street Journal, the campaign—run partly by a firm linked to former Trump campaign manager Brad Parscale—combines digital ad buys on conservative media networks with a network of influencers and chatbots posing as peace activists. Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar confirmed that Israel’s 2026 global image budget exceeds $700 million, more than four times the previous year’s allocation, as it confronts a Pew Research Center finding that 60% of U.S. adults now hold an unfavourable view of the country, a figure that climbs to 80% among Democrats and 75% among those aged 18–29.

Viewed from Tel Aviv, the effort is framed as a necessary counter to “misinformation” and rising anti-Semitism. Parscale told Israeli officials his companies were “the largest thing outside of Fox News to help fight misinformation and Jewish hatred.” In Washington, the White House acknowledged the existence of such foreign influence operations, with Vice President J.D. Vance asserting that some within the Israeli government sought to prolong the war with Iran to shape U.S. opinion, and President Donald Trump reportedly agreeing that Israel, alongside other nations, attempts to influence American views. Meanwhile, on Capitol Hill, a record 40 Senate Democrats voted in May against further military aid to Israel, and a symbolic House amendment to cut $3.3 billion in security assistance drew 103 Democratic votes, including former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who declared that “U.S. policy must change.” Democratic primary victories by candidates explicitly opposing AIPAC’s agenda—in New Jersey, Illinois, and New York—signal a deep shift in the party’s base away from unconditional support.

Operationally, the Parscale contract integrated “narrative messaging” into Salem Media Network properties, reaching conservative audiences, while his team separately produced 100 pieces of content monthly targeting Gen Z on TikTok, Instagram, and podcasts. A parallel tactic created websites such as Allyvia.org, designed to make AI chatbots cite them when users ask about the U.S.-Israel alliance. Researchers at the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft note that Israel is on track to disclose more spending on U.S. influence activities this year than any other nation. Yet the campaign has drawn scepticism even from allies: former Trump strategist Steve Bannon dismissed it with the quip that “they’re trying to sell something that can’t be sold.” The scale of AI-driven engagement—millions of texts via personas named “Sarah” or “Emma” from the “Friends for Peace” group—triggered unease among recipients who found the automated conversations circular and mechanical.

Amid this push, the American political landscape continues to realign. While U.S. administrations have long employed soft-power tools and other nations—from Qatar to Syria’s former leadership—have retained U.S. firms for image polishing, Israel’s fusion of generative AI with traditional hasbara marks a new threshold. Analysts in European and Middle Eastern capitals observe that declining public support is tied directly to images of destruction in Gaza and the war’s civilian toll, and that no digital campaign can easily override that visual record. The Israeli parliament is expected to debate the 2026 public diplomacy budget later this year, while in Washington, the next congressional foreign aid cycle will test whether the Democratic fractures observed in recent months translate into binding legislative restrictions on security assistance to Israel.

Divergence — who tells it how
Axis: Legittimità di Israele
33%Medium
3 blocs · positions from −0.80 to 0.00
Condanna morale di IsraeleDifesa dell'alleanza con Israele
ISRATLIRN
Divergence between press blocs
Israeli press−0.40critical
Atlantic / Anglosphere press0.00neutral
Iranian & allied press−0.80critical
Israeli press−0.40
Voice

Israel acknowledges its image crisis but responds with a mix of self-criticism and diplomatic pragmatism.

Mechanismautocritica polarizzata

The opinion piece uses moral outrage to expose hypocrisy, while the factual report normalizes the spending as standard practice, creating a tension that legitimizes both perspectives.

Omission

The neutral report omits deep moral critiques, while the opinion ignores strategic reasons for the campaign.

OutragePragmatismSplit voices
Atlantic / Anglosphere press0.00
Voice

The United States balances traditional loyalty with new democratic pressures, maintaining a pragmatic approach to the alliance.

Mechanismtriangolazione

By presenting both AIPAC's slipping grip and the reaffirmation of the alliance, an apparent balance is created that masks the real tension, suggesting foreign policy is above public opinion.

Omission

The specific use of AI in the campaign is omitted, downplaying the scale of Israeli interference.

PragmatismDetachment
Iranian & allied press−0.80
Voice

Iran denounces Israel's manipulation of US opinion via AI as proof of its moral collapse.

Mechanismsmascheratura

The narrative builds credibility by contrasting artificial propaganda with genuine human sentiment, reversing the roles of victim and aggressor.

Omission

Any mention of internal Israeli divisions or the US democratic debate is omitted, which would weaken the portrayal of a monolithic Israel.

OutrageAlarm

This story appeared in

8 outlets · 5 languages

Broaden your view

From Economy & Markets

US imposes forced-labour tariffs on 60 nations to sustain trade wall

6 languages · 36 outlets

From Technology

OpenAI Models Breach Sandbox, Autonomously Hack Hugging Face

9 languages · 15 outlets

From Science & Health

Gene Therapies Advance Amid Global Scramble for Access

4 languages · 6 outlets

Read more