
Israel Rejects Trump’s Withdrawal Forecast, Vows to Stay in Lebanon Until Hezbollah Disarmed
Defence Minister Katz says no permission needed to remain in security zone, as new US-mediated talks loom and Lebanese president invited to Washington.
Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz on Thursday publicly dismissed President Donald Trump’s prediction that Israel would soon withdraw from southern Lebanon, declaring that Israeli forces would remain in a self-declared security zone until Hezbollah is fully disarmed. “We did not ask anyone’s permission to enter Lebanon, and we do not need permission to stay,” Katz said in a statement, directly contradicting Trump’s remarks a day earlier at the NATO summit in Ankara.
Trump had told reporters that he discussed a withdrawal with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and believed Israel “wants to” pull out, citing a US-mediated deal with Lebanon. Israeli officials, however, have consistently conditioned any pullback on the complete removal of Hezbollah’s military capabilities. Katz and Netanyahu have both stated that the Israel Defense Forces will not retreat “a millimetre” until that condition is met, and Katz added that the security zone—stretching from the Mediterranean to Mount Hermon—is “clean of residents and terror infrastructure.” In Beirut, Hezbollah has rejected the framework agreement signed in late June, with its secretary-general Naim Qassem calling it “in Israel’s interest” and vowing that none of its clauses would be implemented.
The public divergence between Washington and Tel Aviv comes as a new round of US-mediated negotiations is set for 14–15 July in Rome, and the White House has invited Lebanese President Joseph Aoun to Washington on 21 July. According to Israeli and Lebanese officials, the talks will involve technical teams and follow five previous rounds that produced a framework agreement under which Israel would hand over two areas to the Lebanese army as a pilot. The US has also proposed vetting Lebanese army units to ensure they are free of Hezbollah loyalists, a step Israeli Ambassador Yechiel Leiter described as still under discussion.
Israeli forces continue to operate inside Lebanese territory despite a ceasefire, with Lebanese media reporting overnight demolitions in the town of Khiam and artillery fire near Deir Siriane. Hezbollah-aligned sources told Haaretz that the group’s near-total restraint is a deliberate test to expose what they call Israel’s intention to entrench a permanent military presence rather than complete its withdrawal. The Rome talks and the Aoun-Trump meeting are now the next concrete steps in a dossier where the gap between Israeli security demands and the Lebanese government’s insistence on full sovereignty remains wide.
| Israeli press | +0.30 | aligned |
|---|---|---|
| Arab Levant-Maghreb press | −0.50 | critical |
| Iranian & allied press | −0.60 | critical |
| Atlantic / Anglosphere press | 0.00 | neutral |
Israel asserts its sovereign right to remain in Lebanon to protect its citizens, rejecting any external interference.
It presents Hezbollah as an existential and ineradicable threat, thereby justifying the military presence as a necessary and non-negotiable self-defense measure.
Omits the Israeli ambassador's statements to the UN suggesting a long-term withdrawal.
The Israeli government systematically violates Lebanese sovereignty and international agreements, refusing any compromise.
It frames the Israeli presence as a violation of international law and ongoing negotiations, delegitimizing Israel's position through the language of 'violations' and 'infiltrations'.
Does not report Trump's statement that he believes Israel will withdraw.
The Zionist regime shows its true aggressive and provocative nature, rejecting any external authority.
It portrays Israel as an irrational and belligerent actor that defies even its main ally, reinforcing the narrative of a permanent threat to the region.
Does not mention Trump's statements indicating a possible Israeli withdrawal.
Israel sends mixed signals: on one hand Katz's hard line, on the other the ambassador's caution at the UN.
It juxtaposes two divergent official Israeli statements to suggest that the final position is still evolving and that Katz's words may not be definitive.
Broaden your view
AI’s Cost War Exposes a Global Enforcement Deficit
6 languages · 16 outlets
From TechnologyEconomists and Tech Insiders Unite in Urgent Call for AI Governance
4 languages · 12 outlets
From Science & HealthFirst true sugar detected in interstellar space, as deep-time studies reshape origins debate
4 languages · 15 outlets