
Israel Clears Path for Trump’s Board of Peace and Multinational Force into Gaza
The Israeli security cabinet approved a legal framework for a pilot humanitarian zone in Rafah under international and Palestinian technocratic administration, ahead of Prime Minister Netanyahu’s Washington visit.
The Israeli security cabinet on Sunday endorsed the entry of a multinational stabilisation force and the Board of Peace, the international body under U.S. President Donald Trump’s Gaza peace plan, into a restricted zone in southern Gaza. The decision, approved despite opposition from National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, provides a legal framework for the force to operate in coordination with the Israeli military and grants it immunity under Israeli law. It comes on the eve of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s departure for Washington, where he is to meet Trump on Tuesday, and is widely seen in Israeli political circles as a gesture of goodwill after weeks of stalling.
Under the pilot project, which Israeli officials say will begin in Rafah, up to 500 Moroccan soldiers are expected to deploy to a refugee camp that would be administered by a Palestinian technocratic committee (the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza – NCAG). Palestinian police, recruited by the NCAG and trained in Egypt, would be responsible for internal security but would carry only batons and tasers. The enclave would sit between territory fully controlled by Israel and areas still under Hamas authority, and Israel has made clear it will not withdraw from the so-called “yellow line” for its establishment. Any new contingent entering Gaza requires specific approval by the prime minister, defence minister and foreign minister, a condition that Israeli analysts say guarantees strict control over the force’s composition and deployment.
Viewed from Washington, the decision marks the most concrete step towards implementing Trump’s 20-point plan, which envisages the Board of Peace overseeing demilitarisation, a surge in humanitarian aid and an eventual transition to Palestinian self-administration. U.S. officials, including the Board’s envoy Nickolay Mladenov, welcomed the move as a “critical part of the agreed framework.” Yet the plan has been delayed for months, with Israeli officials linking progress to the disarmament of Hamas — a step the Islamist movement has so far refused. Morocco formally committed to joining the force in July 2026, and sources in Rabat say its contingent will include senior officers, gendarmes and police, along with a military field hospital. Other contributors mentioned include Uganda, though their numbers remain small.
Palestinian perspectives on the pilot are fraught. The NCAG, a body of technocrats formed under the Trump framework, has struggled to recruit and train police because Israel has not permitted thousands of prospective officers to leave Gaza for instruction in Egypt or Jordan. Hamas, for its part, has rejected any disarmament and continues to control the coastal strip’s remaining population centres. Regional analysts in Amman and Cairo note that earlier attempts to establish humanitarian zones in Gaza — including a U.S.-Israeli initiative that led to hundreds of casualties — have bred deep scepticism about the viability of such projects without a comprehensive political settlement.
The Rafah pilot now becomes a test of Netanyahu’s ability to demonstrate diplomatic momentum while managing an Israeli political right that views any international presence in Gaza as a security risk. With Israel controlling an estimated 64 per cent of the territory and vowing to expand that to 70 per cent, and with most of Gaza’s two million inhabitants living in shattered conditions under Hamas rule, the force’s actual deployment will depend on further separate approvals and the outcome of the Netanyahu-Trump meeting. Officials in Jerusalem indicate that the meeting’s success will be measured by what Netanyahu can deliver to Trump, whose support he needs ahead of future elections, making the Gaza concession a calculated opening move.
| Israeli press | 0.00 | neutral |
|---|---|---|
| Iranian & allied press | −0.80 | critical |
| Arab Levant-Maghreb press | −0.50 | critical |
| Atlantic / Anglosphere press | 0.00 | neutral |
Israel authorizes the entry of multinational forces under strict conditions, ensuring full coordination with the IDF and maintaining control over security.
By highlighting the precise operational framework and the involvement of a limited number of foreign troops, the narrative normalizes the decision as a measured, technical step rather than a concession.
Omitted are the broader humanitarian context and Palestinian perspectives on the plan, as well as the conditionality that each force element requires separate approval.
The Zionist regime uses Trump's plan as a cover for permanent occupation, demanding disarmament as a precondition for any change.
By framing the Israeli condition (disarmament) as the central requirement and emphasizing the lack of Palestinian sovereignty, the narrative exposes the plan as a continuation of existing policies rather than a peace initiative.
Omitted are the internal Israeli opposition, the limited scope of the pilot project, and any mention of humanitarian aid components.
The Arab world views this plan as a mechanism to bypass Palestinian sovereignty and entrench Israeli control under the guise of peace.
By highlighting the exclusion of Hamas and the role of a technocratic committee operating under Israeli coordination, the narrative frames the plan as a tool to marginalize legitimate Palestinian representation.
Omitted are the requirement for separate approvals from top Israeli officials each time a force element enters, and the fact that the force is limited to a small area in Rafah.
Israel takes a step toward implementing the US peace plan, preparing for high-level talks.
By reporting only the official confirmation and the trip schedule, the narrative treats the decision as a straightforward development in diplomatic relations, avoiding any controversial context.
Omitted are the internal Israeli opposition, the conditional nature of the force entry, any Palestinian reactions, and the detailed operational plan.
Broaden your view
Brazil files WTO challenge against twin US tariff actions
5 languages · 9 outlets
From TechnologyAI-driven memory costs threaten to kill the sub-$100 smartphone
4 languages · 7 outlets
From Science & HealthVaccination Gaps and Silent Infections Undermine Global Hepatitis Elimination Drive
7 languages · 14 outlets