
Iran Warns of Immediate Retaliation After Israeli Minister Threatens Supreme Leader
Tehran invokes a US commitment under the Islamabad MoU to restrain Israel, as the Doha technical talks proceed and funeral rites for the late leader approach.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi warned on Wednesday that any threat against the country’s people or leadership would be met with an “immediate and powerful response,” a statement issued hours after Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz declared Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei “marked for death.” Araghchi’s post on X directly referenced the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding, a framework brokered by Pakistan, asserting that it obliges Washington to “muzzle its pets in Tel Aviv” and that Iran would “school them” if Israel ignored its patron. The exchange marks a sharp escalation in rhetoric while US and Iranian technical teams were meeting in Doha to discuss shipping security in the Strait of Hormuz and a durable ceasefire, according to a source with direct knowledge of the talks and an Iranian official.
Viewed from Tehran, the Iranian position frames the Islamabad MoU as a binding commitment by President Donald Trump to contain Israeli military action. Araghchi’s statement, carried by state-linked media, described the terms as “crystal clear and public for all to use.” Iranian officials have not disclosed the full text of the memorandum, but they present it as the basis for a long-term accord that would halt hostilities across all fronts. The Iranian leadership has also signalled that the US bears responsibility for any Israeli breach, a stance that places the Doha negotiations in a precarious position.
From Tel Aviv, Defence Minister Katz told Israeli military correspondents on Monday that Mojtaba Khamenei, who succeeded his father after the late leader was killed in an Israeli raid in late February, is a legitimate target. Katz described Iranian negotiators as “good merchants” seeking to extract concessions and insisted that Israel would act independently to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, though he added that achieving this through an agreement would be preferable. Israeli officials maintain that they are not signatories to the Islamabad MoU and are not bound by its provisions. Reports in the US press indicate that President Trump considered a full-scale military option against Iran but ultimately decided to prioritise diplomatic channels.
The threats land amid an opaque leadership transition in Iran. Mojtaba Khamenei has not appeared publicly since his inauguration in early March, communicating only through statements read on state television. Reports suggest he was injured in the same explosion that killed his father. Iranian authorities have scheduled funeral ceremonies for Ali Khamenei from 4 to 9 July across several Iranian and Iraqi cities, an event that analysts in the region note could serve as the new supreme leader’s first public appearance and a potential flashpoint.
The Doha technical talks continue, but the public exchange of threats complicates the diplomatic track. The state of the dossier remains fragile: the US and Iran are seeking to stabilise the Strait of Hormuz and secure a lasting ceasefire, while Israel insists on its operational freedom. The funeral period is expected to test the restraint of all parties, with no formal mechanism in place to adjudicate alleged violations of the Islamabad MoU.
| Arab Levant-Maghreb press | +0.60 | aligned |
|---|---|---|
| Arab Gulf press | −0.50 | critical |
| Russian & CIS press | +0.40 | aligned |
Iran speaks with authority: the Strait of Hormuz is under our command, not CENTCOM's. We reject any attempt to undermine our sovereignty.
Sovereignty projection: Iran presents itself as the sole legitimate guarantor of Hormuz security, turning a military issue into an assertion of international law.
Iranian statements are a threat to regional stability. Tehran uses aggressive rhetoric to distract from its internal failures. The international community must contain Iran.
Threat universalization: Iranian rhetoric is framed as a threat not only to the Gulf but to global stability, calling for international intervention.
The Gulf bloc omits the US obligation to deter Israel, which Iran cites as the basis for its warning, and instead frames Iran's statement as unprovoked aggression.
Iran has every right to defend itself from threats. The United States must fulfill its obligations to contain Israel. Russia supports a diplomatic solution based on respect for sovereignty.
Symmetrical escalation: Russia equates US and Israeli actions to provocations that justify the Iranian response, creating a symmetry of threats.
The Russian bloc omits the perception of Iran's warning as provocative by Gulf states and the potential for regional escalation, focusing solely on the legitimacy of Iran's response.
Broaden your view
Brent crude tops $90 for first time since June as US-Iran strikes intensify
8 languages · 21 outlets
From TechnologyChina’s Kimi K3 model jolts markets, then hits compute ceiling
5 languages · 9 outlets
From Science & HealthFirst true sugar detected in interstellar cloud near galactic centre
2 languages · 7 outlets