
FIFA to examine 64-team World Cup for 2030 after Infantino hails 48-side format
The FIFA president confirmed the proposal will be debated by committees after the 2026 tournament, citing the expanded field’s success in boosting global competitiveness.
Gianni Infantino has confirmed that FIFA will formally examine a proposal to enlarge the men’s World Cup to 64 teams for the 2030 edition, a move that would double the size of the tournament within two cycles. Speaking to the Swiss outlet Bluewin, the FIFA president said the matter “will be examined and discussed in the relevant committees after this World Cup,” framing the expansion as a logical next step after the 48-team format introduced in 2026. Infantino described the current tournament as “a huge success,” noting that teams from every continent scored and earned points, and that nine of ten African sides reached the knockout stage — up from five in 2022. “If you don’t give smaller countries a chance to participate in the World Cup, they’ll lack the incentive to keep improving,” he said.
The idea of a 64-nation finals was first floated in March 2025 by Ignacio Alonso, president of the Uruguayan Football Association, during a FIFA Council meeting. It gained momentum later that year when Alejandro Domínguez, the CONMEBOL president and a FIFA vice-president, publicly endorsed it as a “dream” that would “unite the world, just once.” South American officials view the expansion as a way to give Uruguay, Argentina and Paraguay — who are each scheduled to host only a single opening match in the six-nation 2030 tournament — a more substantial role, potentially a full group stage each. The proposal has since been backed by the African and Asian confederations, whose 101 votes would be decisive in Infantino’s expected re-election bid in 2027.
Opposition has been sharpest in Europe. UEFA president Aleksander Čeferin has labelled the plan a “bad idea,” warning it would damage both the tournament’s quality and the European qualifying process. CONCACAF president Victor Montagliani said it “doesn’t seem right” and would harm “the whole football ecosystem.” Asian football chief Sheikh Salman bin Ibrahim Al Khalifa has also expressed reservations, saying further expansion would bring “chaos.” The 2030 co-hosts — Spain, Portugal and Morocco — are firmly against any late change, as their planning is already advanced for a 48-team event.
Infantino’s intervention comes as the 2026 World Cup enters its final week, with semi-finals featuring three European sides and Argentina. The FIFA president used the interview to defend other controversial aspects of the tournament, including hydration breaks — which he acknowledged had sparked “a lot of debate” — and high ticket prices, pointing to 99.7% stadium occupancy and a resale market where tickets fetch four to five times face value. He projected total revenue of 13 to 14 billion Swiss francs from the 39-day event.
The FIFA Council will take the final decision on the 64-team format, but no timeline has been set. The debate is expected to begin in earnest after the 2026 final, with the outcome likely to reshape the qualifying pathways for all confederations and test the logistical capacity of the six host nations already committed to a tournament spread across three continents.
| Arab Levant-Maghreb press | −0.70 | critical |
|---|---|---|
| Arab Gulf press | 0.00 | neutral |
| Iranian & allied press | +0.20 | neutral |
The Arab world accuses Infantino of using the expansion to cover up refereeing scandals.
By linking the proposal to the 2026 refereeing controversies, it insinuates that FIFA has a hidden agenda, thereby delegitimizing the initiative.
It does not mention that the expansion might be temporary nor the technical details on the new group format.
Gulf countries consider the expansion a purely technical matter, avoiding any political or emotional evaluation.
By reducing the proposal to a problem of mathematical calculation and format, any potential criticism is neutralized and the decision is presented as inevitable.
It does not mention the refereeing controversies nor the emotional reactions of the Arab world, nor the temporary nature of the expansion.
Iran exposes the proposal as a political favor to the 2030 host countries, highlighting the temporary nature of the expansion.
By framing the expansion as a temporary exception and linking it to the interests of host countries, it insinuates that FIFA acts for political calculations rather than sporting merits.
It does not mention the 2026 refereeing controversies nor the emotional reactions of the Arab world, focusing exclusively on the geopolitical aspect.
Broaden your view
US Senator Lindsey Graham Dies Suddenly, Shaking Republican Senate Dynamics
6 languages · 20 outlets
From Economy & MarketsAI’s Cost War Exposes a Global Enforcement Deficit
6 languages · 16 outlets
From TechnologyAgentic AI Moves Beyond Assistance, Forcing a Reckoning on Trust and Human Purpose
3 languages · 6 outlets