Sign in
Edition of 20:00 CETSunday, July 26, 2026
325 outlets · 17 languages825 briefings today
Geopolitics & PoliticsThursday, July 23, 2026

Gulf States and Jordan Unite to Condemn Iranian Attacks, Demand UN Action

A joint statement denounces missile and drone strikes on Bahrain, Kuwait and Jordan as flagrant aggression, invoking the right to self-defence and calling for an urgent Security Council resolution.

On 23 July 2026, the six members of the Gulf Cooperation Council and Jordan issued a joint statement condemning Iranian missile and drone attacks on their territories, singling out Bahrain, Kuwait and Jordan as the most recent targets. The statement, published by the GCC secretariat, described the strikes as “flagrant acts of aggression” that violate the UN Charter, international humanitarian law and Security Council Resolution 2817. It also accused Tehran of breaching explicit commitments made under a memorandum of understanding with the United States. The seven nations called on the Security Council to adopt an urgent resolution demanding an immediate halt to the attacks and recognising the right of affected states to individual and collective self-defence under Article 51 of the UN Charter.

Viewed from Gulf capitals, the attacks represent an unacceptable assault on sovereignty and a direct threat to civilian infrastructure, including energy facilities, desalination plants, ports and airports. The joint statement expressed full solidarity with Saudi Arabia and welcomed a decision by Iraq’s prime minister to confine arms to the state, a move seen in the region as curbing Iran-aligned militias. From Tehran, state-linked media framed the démarche as hypocritical, arguing that the signatory countries had provided their territory and airspace for US military operations against Iran while remaining silent on American and Israeli strikes. Iranian military commands had earlier warned that any further US attacks on infrastructure would trigger Iranian targeting of regional oil, gas and electricity facilities and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

The diplomatic move coincided with a sharp military escalation. On the same day, Jordan’s armed forces engaged four Iranian missiles and six drones, Kuwait’s army responded to hostile drones, and air-raid sirens sounded in Bahrain. The US military has conducted strikes on Iran for twelve consecutive nights since a June ceasefire collapsed, and President Trump threatened on 22 July to destroy an Iranian bridge or power plant for every attack on shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. Iran’s Revolutionary Guards subsequently reported an explosion in what they called a mined route south of the strait, declaring the waterway “completely closed” and warning that no tanker would be allowed to transit without Iranian coordination. The joint statement’s emphasis on freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb directly addresses this threat to global energy trade.

The escalation follows the breakdown of a 14-point US-Iran deal signed on 12 June 2026, which had raised hopes for de-escalation. Instead, hostilities have widened, with US strikes extending from southern to western and central Iran, and Iran launching drones and missiles at what it describes as US targets in the region. The seven-nation bloc’s call for a Security Council resolution sets the stage for a diplomatic confrontation in New York, where Western powers are expected to push for a binding text. The statement also signals a readiness to pursue collective defence arrangements, potentially reshaping regional security alignments. The Security Council is expected to convene in the coming days, though the prospect of a resolution that satisfies all parties remains uncertain given deep divisions among permanent members.

Divergence — who tells it how
Axis: Responsabilità vs. Vittimismo
57%High
3 blocs · positions from −1.00 to +0.30
Condanna dell'IranGiustificazione dell'Iran
GLFATLIRN
Divergence between press blocs
Arab Gulf press−1.00critical
Atlantic / Anglosphere press−0.80critical
Iranian & allied press+0.30aligned
Arab Gulf press−1.00
Voice

The Gulf states and Jordan condemn the Iranian attacks and demand a UN resolution.

Mechanismgiudizializzazione

They use the language of international law and sovereignty to legitimize their position and mobilize the Security Council.

Omission

They omit the context of US and Israeli provocations against Iran in the preceding months.

AlarmOutrage
Atlantic / Anglosphere press−0.80
Voice

The West and its allies denounce the Iranian regime's attacks as a threat to regional stability.

Mechanismescalation simmetrica

They emphasize the continuity of attacks since March 2026 to create a sense of urgency and the need for action.

Omission

They omit the reasons behind the Iranian attacks, presenting them as unilateral aggression.

AlarmOutrage
Iranian & allied press+0.30
Voice

Iran and its supporters accuse the Gulf states of complicity with US aggression and hypocrisy in condemning Iran's defensive responses.

Mechanisminversione di colpa

They reverse blame, attributing responsibility for the attacks to US and Israeli provocations, and portray Iran as a victim.

Omission

They omit that the Iranian attacks hit civilian targets in Bahrain, Kuwait, and Jordan without direct provocation from those countries.

OutrageVictimhood

Broaden your view

Read more
Breaking
Dani Olmo Rejects Apology from Argentine Coach After World Cup Final Clash·Netanyahu Accuses New York Mayor of Fomenting Hate, Vows UN Visit Despite Arrest Calls·Indonesia, Iran, and UAE Issue Weather Alerts as Contrasting Extremes Loom·Indonesia Leads World Mangrove Day with One Million Seedling Planting Blitz·Kazuyoshi Miura, 59, scores first goal in four years as Fukushima United advance in Emperor's Cup·ICC Prosecutor’s Dismissal After Sexual Misconduct Allegations Divides Global Opinion·After Trump pardon, ex-president Hernández returns to Honduras for fraud trial·Mega-Sena and Powerball Jackpots Surge After Weekend Draws Yield No Top Winners·Dani Olmo Rejects Apology from Argentine Coach After World Cup Final Clash·Netanyahu Accuses New York Mayor of Fomenting Hate, Vows UN Visit Despite Arrest Calls·Indonesia, Iran, and UAE Issue Weather Alerts as Contrasting Extremes Loom·Indonesia Leads World Mangrove Day with One Million Seedling Planting Blitz·Kazuyoshi Miura, 59, scores first goal in four years as Fukushima United advance in Emperor's Cup·ICC Prosecutor’s Dismissal After Sexual Misconduct Allegations Divides Global Opinion·After Trump pardon, ex-president Hernández returns to Honduras for fraud trial·Mega-Sena and Powerball Jackpots Surge After Weekend Draws Yield No Top Winners·
Upd. 09:45 PM3 languages · 8 outlets
PreviousGeopolitics & PoliticsNext
8 outlets|3 languages|3 min read
Thursday, July 23, 2026

Gulf States and Jordan Unite to Condemn Iranian Attacks, Demand UN Action

A joint statement denounces missile and drone strikes on Bahrain, Kuwait and Jordan as flagrant aggression, invoking the right to self-defence and calling for an urgent Security Council resolution.

On 23 July 2026, the six members of the Gulf Cooperation Council and Jordan issued a joint statement condemning Iranian missile and drone attacks on their territories, singling out Bahrain, Kuwait and Jordan as the most recent targets. The statement, published by the GCC secretariat, described the strikes as “flagrant acts of aggression” that violate the UN Charter, international humanitarian law and Security Council Resolution 2817. It also accused Tehran of breaching explicit commitments made under a memorandum of understanding with the United States. The seven nations called on the Security Council to adopt an urgent resolution demanding an immediate halt to the attacks and recognising the right of affected states to individual and collective self-defence under Article 51 of the UN Charter.

Viewed from Gulf capitals, the attacks represent an unacceptable assault on sovereignty and a direct threat to civilian infrastructure, including energy facilities, desalination plants, ports and airports. The joint statement expressed full solidarity with Saudi Arabia and welcomed a decision by Iraq’s prime minister to confine arms to the state, a move seen in the region as curbing Iran-aligned militias. From Tehran, state-linked media framed the démarche as hypocritical, arguing that the signatory countries had provided their territory and airspace for US military operations against Iran while remaining silent on American and Israeli strikes. Iranian military commands had earlier warned that any further US attacks on infrastructure would trigger Iranian targeting of regional oil, gas and electricity facilities and the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

The diplomatic move coincided with a sharp military escalation. On the same day, Jordan’s armed forces engaged four Iranian missiles and six drones, Kuwait’s army responded to hostile drones, and air-raid sirens sounded in Bahrain. The US military has conducted strikes on Iran for twelve consecutive nights since a June ceasefire collapsed, and President Trump threatened on 22 July to destroy an Iranian bridge or power plant for every attack on shipping in the Strait of Hormuz. Iran’s Revolutionary Guards subsequently reported an explosion in what they called a mined route south of the strait, declaring the waterway “completely closed” and warning that no tanker would be allowed to transit without Iranian coordination. The joint statement’s emphasis on freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb directly addresses this threat to global energy trade.

The escalation follows the breakdown of a 14-point US-Iran deal signed on 12 June 2026, which had raised hopes for de-escalation. Instead, hostilities have widened, with US strikes extending from southern to western and central Iran, and Iran launching drones and missiles at what it describes as US targets in the region. The seven-nation bloc’s call for a Security Council resolution sets the stage for a diplomatic confrontation in New York, where Western powers are expected to push for a binding text. The statement also signals a readiness to pursue collective defence arrangements, potentially reshaping regional security alignments. The Security Council is expected to convene in the coming days, though the prospect of a resolution that satisfies all parties remains uncertain given deep divisions among permanent members.

Divergence — who tells it how
Axis: Responsabilità vs. Vittimismo
57%High
3 blocs · positions from −1.00 to +0.30
Condanna dell'IranGiustificazione dell'Iran
GLFATLIRN
Divergence between press blocs
Arab Gulf press−1.00critical
Atlantic / Anglosphere press−0.80critical
Iranian & allied press+0.30aligned
Arab Gulf press−1.00
Voice

The Gulf states and Jordan condemn the Iranian attacks and demand a UN resolution.

Mechanismgiudizializzazione

They use the language of international law and sovereignty to legitimize their position and mobilize the Security Council.

Omission

They omit the context of US and Israeli provocations against Iran in the preceding months.

AlarmOutrage
Atlantic / Anglosphere press−0.80
Voice

The West and its allies denounce the Iranian regime's attacks as a threat to regional stability.

Mechanismescalation simmetrica

They emphasize the continuity of attacks since March 2026 to create a sense of urgency and the need for action.

Omission

They omit the reasons behind the Iranian attacks, presenting them as unilateral aggression.

AlarmOutrage
Iranian & allied press+0.30
Voice

Iran and its supporters accuse the Gulf states of complicity with US aggression and hypocrisy in condemning Iran's defensive responses.

Mechanisminversione di colpa

They reverse blame, attributing responsibility for the attacks to US and Israeli provocations, and portray Iran as a victim.

Omission

They omit that the Iranian attacks hit civilian targets in Bahrain, Kuwait, and Jordan without direct provocation from those countries.

OutrageVictimhood

This story appeared in

8 outlets · 3 languages

Broaden your view

From Economy & Markets

Argentine delinquency soars past pandemic peaks as Brazil and India face credit strains

3 languages · 7 outlets

From Technology

Musk Admits Political Overreach in Efficiency Drive, Insists Cuts Caused 'Zero' Deaths

3 languages · 5 outlets

From Science & Health

Artificial sweeteners linked to faster cognitive decline in large Brazilian study

10 languages · 34 outlets

Read more