
German coalition targets sick leave and transparency in bid to revive economy
Reforms requiring in-person doctor visits and limiting freedom of information requests draw criticism from health experts, media groups, and opposition parties.
Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s coalition has announced that from January workers will no longer be able to obtain a sick note by telephone and must consult a doctor in person from the first day of illness, ending a pandemic-era flexibility. The measure is part of a broader package of health and social-security cuts designed to address what Merz calls a “competitive disadvantage” from rising absenteeism. Official data show German employees now average 19.5 sick days per year, up from 13 in 2018, though researchers attribute much of the increase to the 2023 introduction of an electronic sick-note system that improved recording rather than to a genuine surge in illness.
Health economists at the Nuremberg-based Institute for Employment Research point out that available studies indicate telephone certification did not cause absenteeism to rise, while it did relieve pressure on doctors’ surgeries, patients and insurers. The new requirement, they warn, will generate unnecessary administrative burdens for medical practices and employees alike. The reform is scheduled for a final Bundestag vote on Friday morning, but the opposition Greens are blocking swift passage, arguing that 278 pages of last-minute amendments received overnight on 5 July cannot be scrutinised properly. The procedural standoff echoes the 2023 heating-law dispute, when the then-opposition CDU successfully petitioned the constitutional court to delay a vote.
In a parallel legislative push, the government plans to restrict the 2006 Freedom of Information Act so that only German or EU citizens who demonstrate a “legitimate interest” may access official documents. An open letter signed by 110 media advocacy groups and NGOs warns that the change would deny journalists and civil-society organisations a key tool against corruption and abuse of power, weakening public oversight and trust in politics. The government argues the reform is needed to cut bureaucracy and protect sensitive information on critical infrastructure. Viewed from Berlin, the two initiatives reinforce a perception of an executive that is closing ranks: the chancellor recently told critics to “step aside”, and senior politicians have increasingly used criminal complaints to pursue citizens for online insults.
Should the health reform clear the Bundestag before the summer recess, attention will shift to its implementation and to the parliamentary timetable for the freedom-of-information bill. The immediate milestone is Friday’s scheduled vote, where the Greens’ procedural challenge may yet force a delay that pushes the debate into the autumn.
| Latin American press | −0.10 | neutral |
|---|---|---|
| Atlantic / Anglosphere press | −0.30 | critical |
| Sub-Saharan African press | −0.80 | critical |
| Continental European press | −0.50 | critical |
The German government justifies the crackdown on sick leave as an economic efficiency measure, pointing the finger at workers who abuse the system.
The narrative relies on statistical data (19.5 days of absence) to create a sense of urgency and legitimize the reform as a response to an objective problem.
It does not mention possible causes of the rise in absences, such as work stress or health conditions, nor the criticism of the freedom of information restriction.
The Merz government launches an offensive against shirkers, imposing a sick note from day one to expose abuses.
It uses warlike language ('war on workers') to dramatize the reform and present it as a necessary battle against dishonesty.
It does not report the criticism from transparency organizations nor the context of the freedom of information reform.
Civil society organizations denounce the German government's attempt to limit access to information, calling it an attack on democracy.
The petition with 110 signatures and the language of 'anger' create a moral mobilization against the reform.
It does not discuss the sick leave reform nor the economic justifications put forward by the government.
The Merz government shows a 'strange distrust' towards citizens, restricting rights and blaming workers for the crisis.
The criticism appeals to democratic values and the social contract, contrasting the government's attitude with an ideal of transparency and trust.
It does not delve into the details of the health reform nor the underlying economic reasons, focusing on political criticism.
Broaden your view
Meloni’s Electoral Reform Suffers One-Vote Defeat as Coalition Fractures in Secret Ballot
4 languages · 21 outlets
From TechnologyNASA astronaut Anil Menon begins eight-month ISS mission aboard Russian Soyuz
3 languages · 9 outlets
From Science & HealthBlood test predicts Alzheimer’s risk years before symptoms appear
6 languages · 12 outlets