Sign in
Edition of 10:00 CETTuesday, June 23, 2026
307 outlets · 17 languages736 briefings today
Justice & LawMonday, June 22, 2026

Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration Subpoenas Targeting Minnesota Governor and Mayors

Ruling finds Justice Department used grand jury process to coerce and retaliate against officials who opposed immigration enforcement operation.

A federal judge in Minnesota has quashed six grand jury subpoenas that the US Justice Department issued to state and local officials, including Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, ruling that the demands were issued to harass and coerce them over their refusal to assist federal immigration enforcement. The decision, unsealed on Monday, blocks the department’s attempt to compel testimony and records from the offices of the governor, the state attorney general, two mayors, and two county boards.

In his ruling, US District Judge Patrick Schiltz, an appointee of President George W. Bush, wrote that the “dominant purpose” of the subpoenas was to pressure Minnesota officials into enforcing civil immigration laws and to retaliate against them for failing to do so. He found that the Justice Department “has struggled — without success — to identify a single plausible investigatory justification” and that the evidence of improper motive was “overwhelming.” The judge noted that the federal government cannot compel state authorities to carry out federal immigration duties, and that the subpoenas sought material related to constitutionally protected conduct.

Minnesota officials welcomed the ruling as a defence of democratic norms. Governor Walz, the Democratic vice-presidential nominee in 2024, called it “a victory for the rule of law and our democracy,” while Attorney General Keith Ellison said the investigation should “disturb every American.” Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey stated that the subpoenas were “never about justice, law, and order, but the absence of it.” A Justice Department spokesperson told Forbes that the department “takes the unlawful obstruction of federal law enforcement operations extremely seriously and will continue to act in full compliance with the law to investigate these matters.” The department did not immediately indicate whether it would appeal.

The subpoenas originated from a criminal investigation opened after Minnesota officials sued to halt Operation Metro Surge, a Trump-era immigration enforcement surge in the Twin Cities that prompted protests and the fatal shooting of two US citizens by federal agents. Viewed from Washington, the case forms part of a wider pattern: the Justice Department under President Donald Trump has launched investigations into several Democratic elected officials, including New York Attorney General Letitia James and California Governor Gavin Newsom. Legal observers note that the ruling, while subject to appeal, reinforces constitutional limits on the use of grand jury powers to pursue political adversaries. The judge’s order does not affect a separate criminal referral made by Vice President JD Vance concerning alleged fraud schemes in Minnesota, the status of which remains unclear.

How the same story is told elsewhere.

2 editorial groups · 2 languages

37%
ToneTemperatureFocusPositioningHorizon
Atlantic / Anglosphere pressLatin American press
Atlantic / Anglosphere press/ Progressive
OutrageAlarmSkepticism

A federal judge quashed the Justice Department's subpoenas against Minnesota's governor and other Democrats, calling them an attempt to harass and retaliate politically. Separately, another court halted a voter-screening database that unlawfully collected private data on millions of Americans, pointing to a pattern of administrative overreach.

Latin American press/ Bolivarian / progressive
TriumphOutrage

Governor Tim Walz secured a victory over the Trump administration after a judge threw out the unlawful subpoenas. The ruling marks a triumph in the immigration battle and exposes the unconstitutional attempt to coerce Minnesota officials into aiding the federal crackdown.

Related articles

Read more
Breaking
Hong Kong Intensifies Financial Diplomacy as Bangladesh Pivots to Southeast Asia·Trump Says Iran Agreed to Permanent Nuclear Inspections and Open Strait, Tehran Pushes Back·Ex-SNP Chief Executive Peter Murrell Jailed for Embezzling £400,000 in Party Funds·Brazil and Scotland Face Miami Storm Threat as Group Stage Reaches Climax·Lithuanian Government Resigns to Clear Path for New Coalition After Social Democrats Break with Nemuno Ausra·Kenya Suspends US Ebola Quarantine Facility as Court Pardons Minister·Priced Out of the Party: How Soaring Costs Drove World Cup Fans to the Streets·Seoul’s Kospi plunges 10% as AI-fuelled rally unravels, rattling global markets·Hong Kong Intensifies Financial Diplomacy as Bangladesh Pivots to Southeast Asia·Trump Says Iran Agreed to Permanent Nuclear Inspections and Open Strait, Tehran Pushes Back·Ex-SNP Chief Executive Peter Murrell Jailed for Embezzling £400,000 in Party Funds·Brazil and Scotland Face Miami Storm Threat as Group Stage Reaches Climax·Lithuanian Government Resigns to Clear Path for New Coalition After Social Democrats Break with Nemuno Ausra·Kenya Suspends US Ebola Quarantine Facility as Court Pardons Minister·Priced Out of the Party: How Soaring Costs Drove World Cup Fans to the Streets·Seoul’s Kospi plunges 10% as AI-fuelled rally unravels, rattling global markets·
Upd. 07:47 PM2 languages · 2 outlets
2 outlets|2 languages|3 min read
Monday, June 22, 2026

Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration Subpoenas Targeting Minnesota Governor and Mayors

Ruling finds Justice Department used grand jury process to coerce and retaliate against officials who opposed immigration enforcement operation.

A federal judge in Minnesota has quashed six grand jury subpoenas that the US Justice Department issued to state and local officials, including Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, ruling that the demands were issued to harass and coerce them over their refusal to assist federal immigration enforcement. The decision, unsealed on Monday, blocks the department’s attempt to compel testimony and records from the offices of the governor, the state attorney general, two mayors, and two county boards.

In his ruling, US District Judge Patrick Schiltz, an appointee of President George W. Bush, wrote that the “dominant purpose” of the subpoenas was to pressure Minnesota officials into enforcing civil immigration laws and to retaliate against them for failing to do so. He found that the Justice Department “has struggled — without success — to identify a single plausible investigatory justification” and that the evidence of improper motive was “overwhelming.” The judge noted that the federal government cannot compel state authorities to carry out federal immigration duties, and that the subpoenas sought material related to constitutionally protected conduct.

Minnesota officials welcomed the ruling as a defence of democratic norms. Governor Walz, the Democratic vice-presidential nominee in 2024, called it “a victory for the rule of law and our democracy,” while Attorney General Keith Ellison said the investigation should “disturb every American.” Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey stated that the subpoenas were “never about justice, law, and order, but the absence of it.” A Justice Department spokesperson told Forbes that the department “takes the unlawful obstruction of federal law enforcement operations extremely seriously and will continue to act in full compliance with the law to investigate these matters.” The department did not immediately indicate whether it would appeal.

The subpoenas originated from a criminal investigation opened after Minnesota officials sued to halt Operation Metro Surge, a Trump-era immigration enforcement surge in the Twin Cities that prompted protests and the fatal shooting of two US citizens by federal agents. Viewed from Washington, the case forms part of a wider pattern: the Justice Department under President Donald Trump has launched investigations into several Democratic elected officials, including New York Attorney General Letitia James and California Governor Gavin Newsom. Legal observers note that the ruling, while subject to appeal, reinforces constitutional limits on the use of grand jury powers to pursue political adversaries. The judge’s order does not affect a separate criminal referral made by Vice President JD Vance concerning alleged fraud schemes in Minnesota, the status of which remains unclear.

Source divergence

Justice & Law · 2 outlets · 2 languages

37%Medium

How sources tell the same facts differently.

How They Split

Favorable11%
Neutral11%
Critical78%

How the same story is told elsewhere.

2 editorial groups · 2 languages

ToneTemperatureFocusPositioningHorizon
Atlantic / Anglosphere pressLatin American press
Atlantic / Anglosphere press/ Progressive
OutrageAlarmSkepticism

A federal judge quashed the Justice Department's subpoenas against Minnesota's governor and other Democrats, calling them an attempt to harass and retaliate politically. Separately, another court halted a voter-screening database that unlawfully collected private data on millions of Americans, pointing to a pattern of administrative overreach.

Latin American press/ Bolivarian / progressive
TriumphOutrage

Governor Tim Walz secured a victory over the Trump administration after a judge threw out the unlawful subpoenas. The ruling marks a triumph in the immigration battle and exposes the unconstitutional attempt to coerce Minnesota officials into aiding the federal crackdown.

This story appeared in

2 outlets · 2 languages

Related articles

Sport

Algeria fight back to beat Jordan 2-1, eliminate debutants and set up Austria decider

7 languages · 37 outlets

Geopolitics & Politics

UN Inquiry Accuses Israel of Deliberately Targeting Gaza Children as Part of Genocide

10 languages · 19 outlets

Sport

Giannis Antetokounmpo Traded to Miami Heat in Blockbuster Deal on Eve of NBA Draft

9 languages · 14 outlets

Read more