
Egypt Coach Says Messi Wept, Denies Racism Gesture in World Cup Clash
Hossam Hassan claims his crossed-arms signal was a protest against the referee, not an anti-racism protocol, as Argentina’s comeback win fuels officiating debate.
Argentina fought back from two goals down to eliminate Egypt 3–2 after extra time in the World Cup round of 16, a match that turned on a disallowed Egyptian goal and a touchline confrontation between Lionel Messi and the Egypt bench. The result, secured deep in added time, sent the defending champions into the quarter-finals and left the Pharaohs accusing the officials of bias.
Late in the first half, with Egypt leading 1–0, forward Mostafa Ziko had a second goal ruled out after referee François Letexier judged he had stamped on Lisandro Martínez in the build-up. As Egyptian players and staff swarmed the official, head coach Hossam Hassan crossed his arms over his chest in front of television cameras. The gesture was widely interpreted as the FIFA anti-racism protocol signal, but Hassan later insisted it was aimed at Letexier. ‘The gesture was not about racism. I was telling him “you are not being fair”,’ he said in Cairo. Letexier booked Hassan for the protests. Moments later, Messi approached the Egypt bench, repeatedly asking ‘why? why? why?’. Hassan claimed the Argentina captain ‘ended up crying because he was going through a difficult time emotionally’ and that he chose not to reply out of respect for Messi’s career. Egypt’s team director Ibrahim Hassan accused Messi of trying to ‘heat up the situation and provoke us’.
From Cairo, the narrative was one of grievance. Hassan suggested the tournament might be tilted in favour of the world champions, telling beIN Sports that ‘maybe they wanted to keep the world champion in the competition? Maybe they wanted to keep Messi in the picture?’ Ziko went further, telling TSN that ‘the World Cup is directed in favour of Argentina’. The Egyptian federation lodged a formal complaint with FIFA, and the squad received a hero’s welcome on their return home despite the defeat.
The controversy fed into a wider tournament debate over officiating and VAR. Viewed from Zurich, FIFA’s head of referees Pierluigi Collina moved to defend Letexier and other officials, warning that ‘unfounded accusations have no place in our sport’ and could provoke threats against referees and their families. The episode followed a string of contentious VAR interventions across the knockout stage, reviving questions about the consistency of decision-making even as technology expands.
Argentina advanced to the semi-finals, where they will face England. Egypt’s campaign ended in the last 16, but their performance against the title-holders ensured the match would be remembered as much for the fury on the touchline as for the comeback on the pitch.
| Latin American press | −0.10 | neutral |
|---|---|---|
| Atlantic / Anglosphere press | −0.30 | critical |
| Israeli press | −0.40 | critical |
| Indian & South Asian press | −0.20 | neutral |
We report Hassan's version but balance it with Mourinho's criticism to maintain fairness.
By presenting the Egyptian defense and immediately following with Mourinho's criticism, it creates a counterweight effect that weakens Hassan's credibility without openly stating it.
It does not mention systemic VAR criticisms or referee conspiracy theories, focusing only on the personal aspect.
We technology experts dismantle the personal narrative: the real problem is VAR, not Hassan's gesture.
By turning a specific episode into an exemplary case of systemic failure, it shifts attention from individual conduct to technological shortcomings.
It omits Hassan's personal explanation and the emotional context, reducing the incident to a mere statistical data point of VAR malfunction.
We Israelis warn against the conspiracy drift: attacks on referees are a danger to football.
By framing the episode in a long history of referee scandals, it normalizes criticism but brands the current escalation as dangerous.
It does not report Hassan's version or his specific complaints, focusing only on the social reaction.
We Bengalis give voice to Egyptian anger: the referee stole the match.
By repeating accusations of referee bias without counterbalance, it builds a narrative of suffered injustice.
It omits criticism of Hassan and the context of the gesture, as well as technical VAR explanations.
Broaden your view
Sonam Wangchuk Ends Fast as Modi Vows Anti-Cheating Courts, but Protesters Refuse to Back Down
11 languages · 28 outlets
From Economy & MarketsUniCredit Lifts Profit Targets and Assumes Commerzbank Takeover as European Earnings Season Unfolds
3 languages · 6 outlets
From TechnologyMusk Admits Political Overreach in Efficiency Drive, Insists Cuts Caused 'Zero' Deaths
3 languages · 5 outlets