
DeepSeek Develops Own AI Chip to Sidestep US Export Controls
The Chinese startup's move into semiconductor design marks a strategic shift as it seeks to reduce reliance on Nvidia and Huawei amid tightening US restrictions.
DeepSeek, the Hangzhou-based AI startup, is developing its own chip for inference workloads, three people familiar with the plan told Reuters. The news sent Nvidia shares down 1.6 per cent in premarket trading, though London-based analyst Richard Windsor of Radio Free Mobile noted the US chipmaker “is at zero in China and staying there,” limiting the direct commercial impact. The chip is designed for the stage of AI computing where a trained model generates responses, rather than for training new models, and would give DeepSeek greater control over its hardware stack.
Viewed from Washington, the effort carries a clear strategic dimension. US export controls bar Chinese firms from buying Nvidia’s most advanced processors, and Beijing has been pressing its technology champions to build domestic alternatives. DeepSeek founder Liang Wenfeng acknowledged in a rare 2024 interview that chip restrictions posed a challenge. The company previously trained its R1 reasoning model—whose low-cost performance triggered a rout in US tech stocks in January 2025—on Nvidia’s H800, a chip designed for the Chinese market that Washington banned in late 2023. Since then, DeepSeek has leaned increasingly on Huawei’s Ascend chips, with its V4 model optimised for that hardware.
DeepSeek’s move mirrors a broader industry trend. OpenAI last month unveiled its first custom inference chip, developed with Broadcom, while Anthropic is weighing a similar step. In China, Alibaba and Baidu are also developing proprietary AI chips, eroding Huawei’s near-50 per cent share of the domestic AI chip market. For DeepSeek, the in-house chip would reduce dependence on both Nvidia and Huawei, though the project remains at an early stage. The company has been quietly hiring chip-design engineers and has held discussions with external design, foundry and memory partners over the past year.
Significant hurdles remain. Designing a competitive AI chip typically takes years and substantial capital. Manufacturing is constrained by US bans on Chinese access to advanced overseas foundries and high-bandwidth memory, a critical component for inference chips. Meanwhile, US congressional committees are examining ways to limit the use of Chinese AI models by American businesses, citing cybersecurity concerns, according to CNBC. Some US government agencies have already banned DeepSeek, even as tech executives openly promote Chinese models to cut costs. The next factual milestone will be any public confirmation from DeepSeek of a tape-out or manufacturing partnership, though the company has not responded to requests for comment.
| Atlantic / Anglosphere press | 0.00 | neutral |
|---|---|---|
| Indian & South Asian press | +0.40 | aligned |
| Russian & CIS press | 0.00 | neutral |
| Chinese press | 0.00 | neutral |
The West observes DeepSeek's move as a strategic bid for technological sovereignty, framing it as a challenge to US dominance.
By emphasizing the goal of 'ending US reliance,' the narrative creates a zero-sum competition between US and Chinese tech, making DeepSeek's chip development a direct threat to American leadership.
The Atlantic frame omits that DeepSeek also aims to reduce reliance on Huawei, and that the chip is only for inference, not training, which limits its immediate impact on Nvidia's core business.
India frames DeepSeek's chip as a direct blow to Nvidia, celebrating China's potential to bypass US technology and signaling a shift in the global chip landscape.
The use of 'bad news for Nvidia' and 'China may not need your chips' personifies the rivalry, turning a corporate development into a nationalistic confrontation.
The Indian frame omits that the chip is for inference only, so Nvidia's training chip market remains largely unaffected, and that DeepSeek also seeks independence from Huawei.
Russia reframes the story as a US-led crackdown on Chinese AI, portraying Washington as the aggressor and DeepSeek as a victim of geopolitical restrictions.
By focusing on US restrictions rather than DeepSeek's innovation, the narrative shifts attention to American overreach, making the chip development a secondary detail.
The Russian frame omits the specifics of DeepSeek's chip development, including its purpose and timeline, and does not mention the competitive dynamics with Nvidia and Huawei.
China presents DeepSeek's chip as a pragmatic, long-term strategy to achieve self-reliance, with a clear-eyed assessment of the challenges from US export controls and the impact on domestic rival Huawei.
The detailed, technical reporting normalizes the move as a rational business decision, while the mention of Huawei's potential market loss introduces internal competition, deflecting from a purely anti-US narrative.
The Chinese frame omits any criticism of US export controls as unfair, instead treating them as a given challenge, and does not highlight the early stage of development or the risk of failure.
Broaden your view
Platner’s Senate Campaign Collapses After Rape Allegation, Leaving Democrats’ Majority Hopes in Limbo
7 languages · 28 outlets
From Economy & MarketsTax Revenues Surge Across Emerging Markets as Data Reforms Strengthen Fiscal Positions
4 languages · 10 outlets
From Science & HealthCarney’s Saudi Visit and Iran Overture Signal Canada’s Trade-First Pivot
2 languages · 5 outlets