
AI adoption surges but 44% of systems show gender bias, UN study finds
Rapid integration of artificial intelligence across sectors is colliding with evidence of embedded stereotypes, governance gaps and a rising consumer backlash.
A new UN Women analysis of 133 artificial intelligence systems has found that 44 per cent display gender bias, while more than one in four exhibit both gender and racial bias. The finding lands as separate McKinsey data shows 78 per cent of global organisations now use some form of AI, a figure still climbing with the spread of generative models. Viewed together, the numbers capture a defining tension: the technology is being woven into economic and institutional life at speed, yet the data it is trained on continues to encode decades of unequal representation, routinely associating women with home and caregiving and men with leadership and careers.
That pattern-matching logic, which lacks any human understanding of values or ethics, is the same mechanism enabling a surge of low-quality AI-generated content across social platforms. YouTube, TikTok, Substack and Pinterest have all moved in recent months to label synthetic media or give users controls to limit it, while cybersecurity specialists in Latin America report that generative AI is lowering the barrier to entry for cybercrime, allowing attackers to automate phishing, produce convincing deepfakes and coordinate ransomware campaigns with minimal technical skill.
Regional responses are now hardening. The European Union has enacted its AI Act, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations is building a regional AI safety network ahead of a Digital Economy Agreement scheduled for signature at the November ASEAN summit. In Brazil, where IDC projects AI-related investment will reach US$3.4 billion this year, logistics platforms are using machine learning to cut delivery costs and marketing firms report that 70 per cent of professionals already deploy AI for content and campaign personalisation. Yet the International Labour Organization estimates that one in four workers globally is in a role highly exposed to generative AI, with administrative, customer-service and translation jobs facing the most immediate transformation. Universities in Ghana are confronting a parallel challenge as students turn to AI for assignments, prompting calls to redesign assessments around critical thinking rather than recall.
Auditors in Australia have been warned that the nature of assurance is changing and that public trust in government AI will depend on competent oversight of automated decision-making. Meanwhile, a consumer counter-movement is gaining visibility: the newsletter platform Substack has integrated an AI-detection tool, and some brands are beginning to treat “made by humans” as a marketable attribute. The next factual milestone to watch is the ASEAN summit in November, where the digital economy pact is expected to establish binding regional principles on transparency, accountability and data governance for artificial intelligence.
| Southeast Asian press | −0.20 | neutral |
|---|---|---|
| Latin American press | 0.00 | neutral |
| Atlantic / Anglosphere press | −0.30 | critical |
We emphasize that AI does not understand ethics and can give wrong answers, so critical decisions require human review. Do not see AI merely as a cost-saving tool.
The argument gains credibility by citing a senior PwC director, an authoritative figure in AI and data transformation, and by framing the issue as a fundamental ethical limitation rather than a technical glitch.
The bloc omits the positive economic impacts of AI adoption, such as efficiency gains in e-commerce and marketing, and the specific cyber threat trends that are accelerating. Including these would challenge the purely cautionary stance.
We see AI as a double-edged sword: it brings efficiency and innovation, but also cybercrime and job losses. Companies must urgently build compliance and risk management to harness the benefits while mitigating the dangers.
The bloc uses concrete data (425,000 job losses, $3.4 billion investment) to lend credibility, and juxtaposes positive adoption stories with alarming cybercrime trends to create a sense of urgency without being one-sided.
The bloc omits the specific focus on government trust and assurance mechanisms that the Atlantic bloc emphasizes. Including that perspective would shift the responsibility from companies to public institutions.
We warn that without competent oversight, government use of AI will erode public trust. Assurance mechanisms must evolve to match the new reality of agentic AI and automated decision-making.
The argument gains authority by being delivered by a senior government official (DTA deputy chief) in a speech to the oversight community, framing the issue as a matter of institutional integrity and public confidence rather than technical failure.
The bloc omits the specific data on job losses and cybercrime trends present in the Latin American bloc, and the ethical limitations of AI highlighted by the Southeast Asian bloc. Including these would broaden the responsibility beyond government to include private sector and technical limitations.
Broaden your view
Trump guarantees Netanyahu will not be arrested on US soil, countering New York mayor’s ICC enforcement talk
13 languages · 33 outlets
From Economy & MarketsBrent crude tops $90 for first time since June as US-Iran strikes intensify
8 languages · 21 outlets
From Science & HealthLegume-Rich Diets Linked to 30% Lower Hypertension Risk, Global Review Finds
7 languages · 9 outlets