
伊朗与阿曼就霍尔木兹海峡航行安全启动谈判,阿曼提出南北双走廊管理方案
阿曼提议建立分别由两国管辖的南北两条航道,伊朗将该方案带回国内审议;美国则要求所有航道无条件开放,各方外交博弈持续。
伊朗与阿曼于周六在马斯喀特举行高级别会谈,聚焦霍尔木兹海峡海上交通的行政管理和安全通行。据海湾地区外交圈消息人士向媒体透露,阿曼在此期间提出一项方案,建议将海峡航道一分为二:南部走廊穿越阿曼领海,维持战前自由通航状态;北部走廊位于伊朗水域,通行须获得伊朗预先批准,且不收取任何费用。美国有线电视新闻网(CNN)和阿克西奥斯(Axios)等媒体援引知情人士称,该草案尚未最终敲定,伊朗代表未当场同意,而是将其带回德黑兰以供内部评估。
伊朗外交部发言人巴加埃在会谈后强调,未来海峡交通的安排须由两个沿岸国协商确定,并充分考量近几个月的地区安全演变,特别是美国与以色列对伊朗发动的“侵略战争”及其对航运安全的冲击。伊朗方面依据《伊斯兰堡谅解备忘录》第五款,主张应基于自身设定的框架重新开放海峡。一位接近决策层的伊朗消息人士还向当地媒体表示,霍尔木兹海峡完全处于伊阿两国的主权和领海范围内,任何相关决定只能由这两个沿岸国做出,并否认了外界关于“中间国际航道”的传闻。
与此同时,美国政府官员通过多家美媒释放强硬信号,要求伊朗公开宣布所有航运通道均已开放,并停止针对船只的袭击,否则将面临严重军事后果。据悉,华盛顿期盼通过谈判让霍尔木兹海峡恢复到战前状态,但双方在瑞士和卡塔尔的先前两轮会谈并未取得突破。近期美国撤销了伊朗原油销售许可,伊朗指责美方违反停火协议,导致紧张关系再度升级。
霍尔木兹海峡是全球最重要的能源运输咽喉,每天有约两千万桶石油和大量液化天然气通过,对亚洲尤其是中国、日本、韩国的供应安全至关重要。此次外交动向正值地区冲突余波未平、油价震荡风险加剧之时。分析人士指出,任何通行管理机制的改变都可能牵动全球能源市场。目前,各方同意继续在技术及政治层面展开对话,卡塔尔也以中间人身份参与了部分磋商。伊朗国内正在审议阿曼的提案,后续是否正式宣布开放所有航道,以及能否与美国达成新的谅解,将是影响地区稳定的关键节点。
| 伊朗及相关媒体 | +0.30 | aligned |
|---|---|---|
| 阿拉伯海湾媒体 | +0.10 | neutral |
| 阿拉伯黎凡特—马格里布媒体 | 0.00 | neutral |
| 大西洋/英语圈媒体 | −0.20 | neutral |
Iran reaffirms its sovereignty and international law, describing the talks as fruitful and ongoing, without accepting unilateral restrictions.
The bloc employs a sovereignty assertion narrative, normalizing Iran's position as a legitimate and responsible actor, while obscuring US demands and the specific dual-corridor proposal as already acceptable.
Details of the dual-corridor proposal and US pressure are omitted, replaced by vague references to international law and continued talks.
Oman proposes a pragmatic dual-corridor solution, balancing Iran's and the international community's interests.
The bloc uses a rhetoric of constructive mediation, presenting the proposal as feasible and already under discussion, downplaying tensions and Iranian objections.
Iran's principled objections and US pressure are omitted, focusing instead on the mechanics of the plan.
The Arab region observes cautiously, reporting facts without taking sides, yet highlighting the role of international legality.
The bloc adopts a tone of equidistance, using official sources from both sides to create a narrative of diplomatic normalcy, diffusing urgency.
Critical assessments of Iran's stance and strategic implications for the Gulf are omitted.
The Western perspective, via Axios, underscores uncertainty and the need for pressure on Tehran.
The bloc employs a symmetric escalation technique, pitting US demands against Iranian reluctance, creating a sense of urgency and deadlock.
Positive details of the Omani proposal and Iran's willingness to continue talks are omitted, emphasizing the lack of agreement instead.